他们通过你的监禁来判断你:一项关于在精神卫生保健中被监禁的人之间不信任的定性研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Shivani Nishar, Jessica Jaiswal, Shromona Mandal, Esteem Brumfield, Jon Soske
{"title":"他们通过你的监禁来判断你:一项关于在精神卫生保健中被监禁的人之间不信任的定性研究。","authors":"Shivani Nishar,&nbsp;Jessica Jaiswal,&nbsp;Shromona Mandal,&nbsp;Esteem Brumfield,&nbsp;Jon Soske","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01435-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this paper is to explore the experiences of formerly incarcerated people navigating mental health care post-release and understand how mistrust of mental health services and providers is manifested among this population. Interviews were conducted between 2021 and 2022 with 25 people released from incarceration within the past five years. We partnered with community organizations to recruit a diverse sample of participants, using voluntary response and purposive sampling. The interview transcripts were coded using a modified grounded theory approach and the analysis further guided by critical phenomenology in order to center silenced or marginalized perspectives. Mistrust of mental health care was a prominent theme across interviews. Overall, participants felt that they did not have autonomy over their treatment planning and management. Participants described experiencing stigmatizing treatment from providers, suspicion of mandated mental health treatment, and believing that profit over patients was prioritized in the industry–all of which contributed to growing mistrust of the larger mental health system. The participants’ experiences of losing control over their lives and treatment, compounded by a perceived complicity between mental health and carceral systems, shaped their mistrust toward mental health care. Nevertheless, many demonstrated remarkable persistence in seeking care and engaging with multiple providers, while also actively seeking to reclaim their autonomy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"52 3","pages":"561 - 569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"They Judge You By Your Incarceration: A Qualitative Study of Mistrust Among Formerly Incarcerated People Navigating Mental Health Care\",\"authors\":\"Shivani Nishar,&nbsp;Jessica Jaiswal,&nbsp;Shromona Mandal,&nbsp;Esteem Brumfield,&nbsp;Jon Soske\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10488-025-01435-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The goal of this paper is to explore the experiences of formerly incarcerated people navigating mental health care post-release and understand how mistrust of mental health services and providers is manifested among this population. Interviews were conducted between 2021 and 2022 with 25 people released from incarceration within the past five years. We partnered with community organizations to recruit a diverse sample of participants, using voluntary response and purposive sampling. The interview transcripts were coded using a modified grounded theory approach and the analysis further guided by critical phenomenology in order to center silenced or marginalized perspectives. Mistrust of mental health care was a prominent theme across interviews. Overall, participants felt that they did not have autonomy over their treatment planning and management. Participants described experiencing stigmatizing treatment from providers, suspicion of mandated mental health treatment, and believing that profit over patients was prioritized in the industry–all of which contributed to growing mistrust of the larger mental health system. The participants’ experiences of losing control over their lives and treatment, compounded by a perceived complicity between mental health and carceral systems, shaped their mistrust toward mental health care. Nevertheless, many demonstrated remarkable persistence in seeking care and engaging with multiple providers, while also actively seeking to reclaim their autonomy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"561 - 569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-025-01435-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-025-01435-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是探讨以前被监禁的人在释放后进行心理健康护理的经历,并了解对心理健康服务和提供者的不信任是如何在这一人群中表现出来的。在2021年至2022年期间,对25名在过去五年内获释的人进行了采访。我们与社区组织合作,采用自愿回答和有目的抽样的方式,招募不同类型的参与者。访谈记录采用一种改进的扎根理论方法进行编码,并在批判现象学的进一步指导下进行分析,以便将沉默或边缘化的观点集中起来。对精神卫生保健的不信任是访谈中的一个突出主题。总的来说,参与者觉得他们在治疗计划和管理上没有自主权。参与者描述了他们从医疗服务提供者那里获得的污名化治疗,对强制性精神卫生治疗的怀疑,以及认为利润高于病人是这个行业的优先考虑因素——所有这些都导致了人们对更大的精神卫生系统越来越不信任。参与者对自己的生活和治疗失去控制的经历,再加上他们认为精神卫生和医疗系统之间存在共谋,形成了他们对精神卫生保健的不信任。尽管如此,许多人在寻求治疗和与多个提供者接触方面表现出了非凡的毅力,同时也积极寻求恢复他们的自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
They Judge You By Your Incarceration: A Qualitative Study of Mistrust Among Formerly Incarcerated People Navigating Mental Health Care

The goal of this paper is to explore the experiences of formerly incarcerated people navigating mental health care post-release and understand how mistrust of mental health services and providers is manifested among this population. Interviews were conducted between 2021 and 2022 with 25 people released from incarceration within the past five years. We partnered with community organizations to recruit a diverse sample of participants, using voluntary response and purposive sampling. The interview transcripts were coded using a modified grounded theory approach and the analysis further guided by critical phenomenology in order to center silenced or marginalized perspectives. Mistrust of mental health care was a prominent theme across interviews. Overall, participants felt that they did not have autonomy over their treatment planning and management. Participants described experiencing stigmatizing treatment from providers, suspicion of mandated mental health treatment, and believing that profit over patients was prioritized in the industry–all of which contributed to growing mistrust of the larger mental health system. The participants’ experiences of losing control over their lives and treatment, compounded by a perceived complicity between mental health and carceral systems, shaped their mistrust toward mental health care. Nevertheless, many demonstrated remarkable persistence in seeking care and engaging with multiple providers, while also actively seeking to reclaim their autonomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信