与对照组相比,干燥病的不良妊娠结局:母胎医学的跨学科方法。

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS
AJP Reports Pub Date : 2025-04-08 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2562-1643
Lauren Tesoriero, Jennifer Kidd, Julie Piccione, Peter Izmirly, Meredith Akerman, Steven Carsons, Patricia Rekawek, Julie Nusbaum
{"title":"与对照组相比,干燥病的不良妊娠结局:母胎医学的跨学科方法。","authors":"Lauren Tesoriero, Jennifer Kidd, Julie Piccione, Peter Izmirly, Meredith Akerman, Steven Carsons, Patricia Rekawek, Julie Nusbaum","doi":"10.1055/a-2562-1643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Outside of the association of SS-A antibody with congenital heart block, little is known about adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, in patients with Sjogren's disease (SjD). Our study involved collaboration with maternal-fetal medicine (MFM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients: SjD patients were matched 1:3 with non-SjD controls. SjD patients were included by meeting the 2016 ACR/EULAR Criteria or by a rheumatologist diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were concurrent autoimmune disease or related antibodies. A composite of grouped outcomes was utilized and verified by MFM specialists. The primary outcome was adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample <i>t</i> -test and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 patients were included: 12 SjD patients and 36 controls. APO was significantly increased in SjD with one preterm birth, one fetal growth restriction, and one limb anomaly; non-SjD had one cardiac anomaly. There were no cases of CHB. SjD patients were more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls. No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found. We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology and future studies should be performed.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls.No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found.We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology, prompting future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":"e47-e52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Sjogren's Disease Compared to Controls: An Interdisciplinary Approach with Maternal-Fetal Medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Tesoriero, Jennifer Kidd, Julie Piccione, Peter Izmirly, Meredith Akerman, Steven Carsons, Patricia Rekawek, Julie Nusbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2562-1643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Outside of the association of SS-A antibody with congenital heart block, little is known about adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, in patients with Sjogren's disease (SjD). Our study involved collaboration with maternal-fetal medicine (MFM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients: SjD patients were matched 1:3 with non-SjD controls. SjD patients were included by meeting the 2016 ACR/EULAR Criteria or by a rheumatologist diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were concurrent autoimmune disease or related antibodies. A composite of grouped outcomes was utilized and verified by MFM specialists. The primary outcome was adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample <i>t</i> -test and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 patients were included: 12 SjD patients and 36 controls. APO was significantly increased in SjD with one preterm birth, one fetal growth restriction, and one limb anomaly; non-SjD had one cardiac anomaly. There were no cases of CHB. SjD patients were more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls. No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found. We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology and future studies should be performed.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls.No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found.We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology, prompting future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJP Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"e47-e52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020534/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJP Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2562-1643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2562-1643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:除了SS-A抗体与先天性心脏传导阻滞的关联外,对于干燥病(SjD)患者的不良孕产妇和新生儿结局知之甚少。我们的研究涉及与母胎医学(MFM)合作。方法:对妊娠患者进行回顾性队列研究:SjD患者与非SjD对照组1:3配对。符合2016年ACR/EULAR标准或风湿病学家诊断的SjD患者被纳入。排除标准为并发自身免疫性疾病或相关抗体。MFM专家使用并验证了分组结果的组合。两组间的主要结局为不良妊娠结局(APO)。统计分析采用双样本t检验和Fisher确切检验。结果:纳入48例患者:SjD患者12例,对照组36例。APO在1例早产、1例胎儿生长受限和1例肢体异常的SjD中显著升高;非sjd有一个心脏异常。无慢性乙型肝炎病例。SjD患者更有可能通过剖宫产分娩。结论:与对照组相比,SjD患者发生APO的风险增加。两组新生儿结局无显著差异。我们推测胎盘病理可能在病理生理学中发挥作用,未来的研究有待开展。关键点:与对照组相比,SjD患者APO的风险增加。两组新生儿结局无显著差异。我们推测胎盘病理可能在病理生理学中发挥作用,提示未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Sjogren's Disease Compared to Controls: An Interdisciplinary Approach with Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

Objectives: Outside of the association of SS-A antibody with congenital heart block, little is known about adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, in patients with Sjogren's disease (SjD). Our study involved collaboration with maternal-fetal medicine (MFM).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients: SjD patients were matched 1:3 with non-SjD controls. SjD patients were included by meeting the 2016 ACR/EULAR Criteria or by a rheumatologist diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were concurrent autoimmune disease or related antibodies. A composite of grouped outcomes was utilized and verified by MFM specialists. The primary outcome was adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t -test and Fisher's exact test.

Results: 48 patients were included: 12 SjD patients and 36 controls. APO was significantly increased in SjD with one preterm birth, one fetal growth restriction, and one limb anomaly; non-SjD had one cardiac anomaly. There were no cases of CHB. SjD patients were more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery.

Conclusion: There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls. No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found. We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology and future studies should be performed.

Key points: There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls.No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found.We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology, prompting future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJP Reports
AJP Reports PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信