监测健康老龄化家庭和社区服务的利用模式:一项横断面研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Wusi Zhou, Xiangjing Zhang, Xiaoyang Lyu
{"title":"监测健康老龄化家庭和社区服务的利用模式:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Wusi Zhou, Xiangjing Zhang, Xiaoyang Lyu","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05918-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The home- and community-based care model has been developed to enable older people healthy ageing in place. However, few studies have investigated how well particular home- and community-based services (HCBS) have reached older people. This is crucial to address the issue of inequity in healthcare for seniors living independently. This study aims to examine the utilisation of the overall HCBS as well as its three main categories: life care services (LCS), medical health services (MHS) and spiritual comfort services (SCS). It will compare various predictors influencing the uptake of these services and highlight broader policy implications for building an integrated care system that promotes ageing within communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research adopted a cross-sectional research design with a comparative analysis approach. A questionnaire survey was carried out with 1246 older adults in Zhejiang province, yielding 1171 valid responses and an overall response rate of 93.98%. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses were applied to identify differences in service utilisation and key determinants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research findings showed that overall HCBS utilisation was relatively low, influenced by factors such as age, family support, self-assessed economic status, community type, type of social security benefits, awareness of regular HCBS, self-care capability and self-rated health. Substantial variations were observed in the utilisation rates of LCS, MHS and SCS. The young-old population was less likely to use LCS and MHS, whereas individuals with family support and chronic diseases were more inclined to utilise MHS and SCS. Economic condition and community type emerged as key determinants affecting the use of all three services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that HCBS have not been fully utilised and are influenced by various factors. Moving forward, it is crucial to address the care needs of different income groups, with particular attention to the unique challenges faced by rural older adults. Targeted policies and interventions are necessary to enhance accessibility for those with chronic illnesses and limited family support. Local governments should work in partnership with families to develop higher-quality, place-based integrated care services, ensuring that both medical care and spiritual well-being services are effectively delivered to meet the evovling needs of an ageing population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring utilisation patterns of home- and community-based services for healthy ageing: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Wusi Zhou, Xiangjing Zhang, Xiaoyang Lyu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-025-05918-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The home- and community-based care model has been developed to enable older people healthy ageing in place. However, few studies have investigated how well particular home- and community-based services (HCBS) have reached older people. This is crucial to address the issue of inequity in healthcare for seniors living independently. This study aims to examine the utilisation of the overall HCBS as well as its three main categories: life care services (LCS), medical health services (MHS) and spiritual comfort services (SCS). It will compare various predictors influencing the uptake of these services and highlight broader policy implications for building an integrated care system that promotes ageing within communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research adopted a cross-sectional research design with a comparative analysis approach. A questionnaire survey was carried out with 1246 older adults in Zhejiang province, yielding 1171 valid responses and an overall response rate of 93.98%. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses were applied to identify differences in service utilisation and key determinants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research findings showed that overall HCBS utilisation was relatively low, influenced by factors such as age, family support, self-assessed economic status, community type, type of social security benefits, awareness of regular HCBS, self-care capability and self-rated health. Substantial variations were observed in the utilisation rates of LCS, MHS and SCS. The young-old population was less likely to use LCS and MHS, whereas individuals with family support and chronic diseases were more inclined to utilise MHS and SCS. Economic condition and community type emerged as key determinants affecting the use of all three services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that HCBS have not been fully utilised and are influenced by various factors. Moving forward, it is crucial to address the care needs of different income groups, with particular attention to the unique challenges faced by rural older adults. Targeted policies and interventions are necessary to enhance accessibility for those with chronic illnesses and limited family support. Local governments should work in partnership with families to develop higher-quality, place-based integrated care services, ensuring that both medical care and spiritual well-being services are effectively delivered to meet the evovling needs of an ageing population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05918-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05918-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:发展了家庭和社区护理模式,使老年人能够健康地度过晚年。然而,很少有研究调查了特殊的家庭和社区服务(HCBS)对老年人的影响。这对于解决独立生活的老年人在医疗保健方面的不平等问题至关重要。本研究旨在探讨整体医疗保健服务的使用情况,以及它的三个主要类别:生命护理服务(LCS)、医疗保健服务(MHS)和精神安慰服务(SCS)。它将比较影响这些服务采用的各种预测因素,并强调建立一个促进社区内老龄化的综合护理系统的更广泛的政策影响。方法:采用横断面研究设计,采用比较分析法。对浙江省1246名老年人进行问卷调查,有效回复1171份,总回复率为93.98%。描述性统计和二元逻辑回归分析应用于确定服务利用率和关键决定因素的差异。结果:受年龄、家庭支持、自评经济状况、社区类型、社会保障福利类型、定期HCBS意识、自我保健能力和自评健康状况等因素影响,总体HCBS利用率较低。LCS、MHS和SCS的利用率存在显著差异。年轻老年人较少使用LCS和MHS,而有家庭支持和慢性病的个体更倾向于使用MHS和SCS。经济条件和社区类型成为影响所有三种服务使用的关键决定因素。结论:本研究强调HCBS尚未得到充分利用,并受到多种因素的影响。展望未来,解决不同收入群体的护理需求至关重要,尤其要关注农村老年人面临的独特挑战。有针对性的政策和干预措施是必要的,以提高慢性病患者和家庭支持有限的人的可及性。地方政府应与家庭合作,发展更高质量的就地综合护理服务,确保有效提供医疗保健和精神健康服务,以满足人口老龄化不断变化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring utilisation patterns of home- and community-based services for healthy ageing: a cross-sectional study.

Background: The home- and community-based care model has been developed to enable older people healthy ageing in place. However, few studies have investigated how well particular home- and community-based services (HCBS) have reached older people. This is crucial to address the issue of inequity in healthcare for seniors living independently. This study aims to examine the utilisation of the overall HCBS as well as its three main categories: life care services (LCS), medical health services (MHS) and spiritual comfort services (SCS). It will compare various predictors influencing the uptake of these services and highlight broader policy implications for building an integrated care system that promotes ageing within communities.

Methods: The research adopted a cross-sectional research design with a comparative analysis approach. A questionnaire survey was carried out with 1246 older adults in Zhejiang province, yielding 1171 valid responses and an overall response rate of 93.98%. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses were applied to identify differences in service utilisation and key determinants.

Results: The research findings showed that overall HCBS utilisation was relatively low, influenced by factors such as age, family support, self-assessed economic status, community type, type of social security benefits, awareness of regular HCBS, self-care capability and self-rated health. Substantial variations were observed in the utilisation rates of LCS, MHS and SCS. The young-old population was less likely to use LCS and MHS, whereas individuals with family support and chronic diseases were more inclined to utilise MHS and SCS. Economic condition and community type emerged as key determinants affecting the use of all three services.

Conclusions: This study highlights that HCBS have not been fully utilised and are influenced by various factors. Moving forward, it is crucial to address the care needs of different income groups, with particular attention to the unique challenges faced by rural older adults. Targeted policies and interventions are necessary to enhance accessibility for those with chronic illnesses and limited family support. Local governments should work in partnership with families to develop higher-quality, place-based integrated care services, ensuring that both medical care and spiritual well-being services are effectively delivered to meet the evovling needs of an ageing population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信