Capucine Lepers, Aurélie Bellanger, Oana Petrof, Martin Verniquet, Mikaël Le Bouter, Cédric Taverne
{"title":"评估疫苗免疫原性测定的线性:应用和与临床终点的联系。","authors":"Capucine Lepers, Aurélie Bellanger, Oana Petrof, Martin Verniquet, Mikaël Le Bouter, Cédric Taverne","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2025.2501934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing the performance of an immunogenicity assay before using it to support vaccine clinical trials is mandatory. Further validation of assay performance is even requested to support Phase III studies. While assay validation requires adherence to predefined acceptance criteria, there is no universal stringency level for earlier phases of assay development. Setting scientifically sound criteria for success is about finding the right balance between unavoidable assay limitations and ensuring the assay is fit-for-purpose. In this paper, we focus on the evaluation of linearity for immunogenicity assays and its use as surrogate for accuracy evaluation in the absence of reference material. We propose a simple method for evaluating assay linearity and understanding the impact of a linearity deviation on the evaluation of the response increase in clinical trial. Assessment is reliable in absence of known concentration samples, unlike methods in industry guidance, making the proposed method more versatile. Method is illustrated by two case studies, representative of the assays used in the vaccine field. Making the link between assay linearity and clinical endpoints provides a simple and clear framework to support the definition of assay validation criteria, applicable to a variety of immunogenicity assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"583-594"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing linearity of vaccine immunogenicity assays: application and link with clinical endpoints.\",\"authors\":\"Capucine Lepers, Aurélie Bellanger, Oana Petrof, Martin Verniquet, Mikaël Le Bouter, Cédric Taverne\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17576180.2025.2501934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing the performance of an immunogenicity assay before using it to support vaccine clinical trials is mandatory. Further validation of assay performance is even requested to support Phase III studies. While assay validation requires adherence to predefined acceptance criteria, there is no universal stringency level for earlier phases of assay development. Setting scientifically sound criteria for success is about finding the right balance between unavoidable assay limitations and ensuring the assay is fit-for-purpose. In this paper, we focus on the evaluation of linearity for immunogenicity assays and its use as surrogate for accuracy evaluation in the absence of reference material. We propose a simple method for evaluating assay linearity and understanding the impact of a linearity deviation on the evaluation of the response increase in clinical trial. Assessment is reliable in absence of known concentration samples, unlike methods in industry guidance, making the proposed method more versatile. Method is illustrated by two case studies, representative of the assays used in the vaccine field. Making the link between assay linearity and clinical endpoints provides a simple and clear framework to support the definition of assay validation criteria, applicable to a variety of immunogenicity assays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"583-594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2501934\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2501934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing linearity of vaccine immunogenicity assays: application and link with clinical endpoints.
Assessing the performance of an immunogenicity assay before using it to support vaccine clinical trials is mandatory. Further validation of assay performance is even requested to support Phase III studies. While assay validation requires adherence to predefined acceptance criteria, there is no universal stringency level for earlier phases of assay development. Setting scientifically sound criteria for success is about finding the right balance between unavoidable assay limitations and ensuring the assay is fit-for-purpose. In this paper, we focus on the evaluation of linearity for immunogenicity assays and its use as surrogate for accuracy evaluation in the absence of reference material. We propose a simple method for evaluating assay linearity and understanding the impact of a linearity deviation on the evaluation of the response increase in clinical trial. Assessment is reliable in absence of known concentration samples, unlike methods in industry guidance, making the proposed method more versatile. Method is illustrated by two case studies, representative of the assays used in the vaccine field. Making the link between assay linearity and clinical endpoints provides a simple and clear framework to support the definition of assay validation criteria, applicable to a variety of immunogenicity assays.
BioanalysisBIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing.
The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality.
Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing.
The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques.
Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.