评估疫苗免疫原性测定的线性:应用和与临床终点的联系。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Bioanalysis Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1080/17576180.2025.2501934
Capucine Lepers, Aurélie Bellanger, Oana Petrof, Martin Verniquet, Mikaël Le Bouter, Cédric Taverne
{"title":"评估疫苗免疫原性测定的线性:应用和与临床终点的联系。","authors":"Capucine Lepers, Aurélie Bellanger, Oana Petrof, Martin Verniquet, Mikaël Le Bouter, Cédric Taverne","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2025.2501934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing the performance of an immunogenicity assay before using it to support vaccine clinical trials is mandatory. Further validation of assay performance is even requested to support Phase III studies. While assay validation requires adherence to predefined acceptance criteria, there is no universal stringency level for earlier phases of assay development. Setting scientifically sound criteria for success is about finding the right balance between unavoidable assay limitations and ensuring the assay is fit-for-purpose. In this paper, we focus on the evaluation of linearity for immunogenicity assays and its use as surrogate for accuracy evaluation in the absence of reference material. We propose a simple method for evaluating assay linearity and understanding the impact of a linearity deviation on the evaluation of the response increase in clinical trial. Assessment is reliable in absence of known concentration samples, unlike methods in industry guidance, making the proposed method more versatile. Method is illustrated by two case studies, representative of the assays used in the vaccine field. Making the link between assay linearity and clinical endpoints provides a simple and clear framework to support the definition of assay validation criteria, applicable to a variety of immunogenicity assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"583-594"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing linearity of vaccine immunogenicity assays: application and link with clinical endpoints.\",\"authors\":\"Capucine Lepers, Aurélie Bellanger, Oana Petrof, Martin Verniquet, Mikaël Le Bouter, Cédric Taverne\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17576180.2025.2501934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing the performance of an immunogenicity assay before using it to support vaccine clinical trials is mandatory. Further validation of assay performance is even requested to support Phase III studies. While assay validation requires adherence to predefined acceptance criteria, there is no universal stringency level for earlier phases of assay development. Setting scientifically sound criteria for success is about finding the right balance between unavoidable assay limitations and ensuring the assay is fit-for-purpose. In this paper, we focus on the evaluation of linearity for immunogenicity assays and its use as surrogate for accuracy evaluation in the absence of reference material. We propose a simple method for evaluating assay linearity and understanding the impact of a linearity deviation on the evaluation of the response increase in clinical trial. Assessment is reliable in absence of known concentration samples, unlike methods in industry guidance, making the proposed method more versatile. Method is illustrated by two case studies, representative of the assays used in the vaccine field. Making the link between assay linearity and clinical endpoints provides a simple and clear framework to support the definition of assay validation criteria, applicable to a variety of immunogenicity assays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"583-594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2501934\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2501934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在使用免疫原性测定法支持疫苗临床试验之前,必须对其性能进行评估。甚至要求进一步验证分析性能以支持III期研究。虽然分析验证需要遵守预定义的接受标准,但在分析开发的早期阶段没有通用的严格程度。为成功设定科学合理的标准是在不可避免的分析限制和确保分析适合目的之间找到适当的平衡。在本文中,我们着重于评价免疫原性检测的线性度及其在缺乏标准物质的情况下作为准确性评价的替代方法。我们提出了一种简单的方法来评估检测线性和理解线性偏差对临床试验中反应增加评估的影响。与行业指南中的方法不同,在没有已知浓度样本的情况下,评估是可靠的,这使得所提出的方法更加通用。方法是由两个案例研究说明,具有代表性的分析,用于疫苗领域。在检测线性和临床终点之间建立联系提供了一个简单而清晰的框架来支持检测验证标准的定义,适用于各种免疫原性检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing linearity of vaccine immunogenicity assays: application and link with clinical endpoints.

Assessing the performance of an immunogenicity assay before using it to support vaccine clinical trials is mandatory. Further validation of assay performance is even requested to support Phase III studies. While assay validation requires adherence to predefined acceptance criteria, there is no universal stringency level for earlier phases of assay development. Setting scientifically sound criteria for success is about finding the right balance between unavoidable assay limitations and ensuring the assay is fit-for-purpose. In this paper, we focus on the evaluation of linearity for immunogenicity assays and its use as surrogate for accuracy evaluation in the absence of reference material. We propose a simple method for evaluating assay linearity and understanding the impact of a linearity deviation on the evaluation of the response increase in clinical trial. Assessment is reliable in absence of known concentration samples, unlike methods in industry guidance, making the proposed method more versatile. Method is illustrated by two case studies, representative of the assays used in the vaccine field. Making the link between assay linearity and clinical endpoints provides a simple and clear framework to support the definition of assay validation criteria, applicable to a variety of immunogenicity assays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioanalysis
Bioanalysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing. The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality. Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing. The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques. Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信