初级保健中膝关节骨关节炎管理的新服务交付模式(PARTNER)疼痛和功能结局的调节因子和中介因子:一项随机对照试验的二次探索性分析。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Abdolhay Farivar, Jocelyn L Bowden, Kim L Bennell, Andrew M Briggs, Stephen J Bunker, Rana S Hinman, Thorlene Egerton, Simon D French, Marie Pirotta, Karen Schuck, Venkatesha Venkatesha, Nicholas A Zwar, David J Hunter
{"title":"初级保健中膝关节骨关节炎管理的新服务交付模式(PARTNER)疼痛和功能结局的调节因子和中介因子:一项随机对照试验的二次探索性分析。","authors":"Abdolhay Farivar, Jocelyn L Bowden, Kim L Bennell, Andrew M Briggs, Stephen J Bunker, Rana S Hinman, Thorlene Egerton, Simon D French, Marie Pirotta, Karen Schuck, Venkatesha Venkatesha, Nicholas A Zwar, David J Hunter","doi":"10.1002/acr.25564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore moderators and mediators influenced changes in pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) receiving a new model of primary care service delivery (PARTNER), at 12 months (ACTRN12617001595303).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analyses of a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing PARTNER to usual general practitioner-delivered care (n=217, 112 PARTNER, 105 usual care) on knee pain/function. Pain was measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (range 0-10, higher= worse) and the function measured using the function subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (range 0-100, higher= better). Baseline variables selected as potential moderators included age, sex, body mass index, pain duration, residential state, living arrangements, education, employment status, back pain and other joint issues. Mediation variables included physical activity, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, OA self-management, self-efficacy, sleep, fatigue, quality-of-life, depression, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For change in pain, no moderators influenced the intervention effect. However, age moderated change in function, with intervention participants <50 years demonstrating greater functional improvement than older counterparts, compared to the control group (50-69 years: coefficient -32.88 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): -45.02, -20.74], >=70 years: coefficient -24.28 [95%CI: -36.53, -12.02]). Mediation analysis revealed significant indirect effects of overall, treatment-related, and symptom-related satisfaction on mean change in pain (-0.10, -0.06, and -0.08, respectively) and function (0.09, 0.05, and 0.07, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger PARTNER participants showed greater functional improvement compared to older age groups (moderating effect). Additionally, indirect mediation effects suggest increased satisfaction across the three satisfaction domains led to reduced knee pain and enhanced function.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderators and mediators of pain and function outcomes in a new service delivery model for management of knee osteoarthritis in primary care (PARTNER): Secondary exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Abdolhay Farivar, Jocelyn L Bowden, Kim L Bennell, Andrew M Briggs, Stephen J Bunker, Rana S Hinman, Thorlene Egerton, Simon D French, Marie Pirotta, Karen Schuck, Venkatesha Venkatesha, Nicholas A Zwar, David J Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore moderators and mediators influenced changes in pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) receiving a new model of primary care service delivery (PARTNER), at 12 months (ACTRN12617001595303).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analyses of a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing PARTNER to usual general practitioner-delivered care (n=217, 112 PARTNER, 105 usual care) on knee pain/function. Pain was measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (range 0-10, higher= worse) and the function measured using the function subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (range 0-100, higher= better). Baseline variables selected as potential moderators included age, sex, body mass index, pain duration, residential state, living arrangements, education, employment status, back pain and other joint issues. Mediation variables included physical activity, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, OA self-management, self-efficacy, sleep, fatigue, quality-of-life, depression, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For change in pain, no moderators influenced the intervention effect. However, age moderated change in function, with intervention participants <50 years demonstrating greater functional improvement than older counterparts, compared to the control group (50-69 years: coefficient -32.88 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): -45.02, -20.74], >=70 years: coefficient -24.28 [95%CI: -36.53, -12.02]). Mediation analysis revealed significant indirect effects of overall, treatment-related, and symptom-related satisfaction on mean change in pain (-0.10, -0.06, and -0.08, respectively) and function (0.09, 0.05, and 0.07, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger PARTNER participants showed greater functional improvement compared to older age groups (moderating effect). Additionally, indirect mediation effects suggest increased satisfaction across the three satisfaction domains led to reduced knee pain and enhanced function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨在接受一种新的初级保健服务提供模式(PARTNER)治疗12个月时(ACTRN12617001595303),膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者疼痛和功能变化的调节因子和介质的影响。方法:对一项分组随机对照试验进行二次分析,比较PARTNER与普通全科医生提供的护理(n=217, 112 PARTNER, 105普通护理)对膝关节疼痛/功能的影响。采用数值评定量表(范围0-10,越高=越差)测量疼痛,采用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分的功能亚量表(范围0-100,越高=越好)测量功能。选择作为潜在调节因素的基线变量包括年龄、性别、体重指数、疼痛持续时间、居住状态、生活安排、教育程度、就业状况、背痛和其他关节问题。中介变量包括体力活动、运动恐惧、疼痛灾难、OA自我管理、自我效能、睡眠、疲劳、生活质量、抑郁和满意度。结果:对于疼痛的改变,没有调节因子影响干预效果。然而,年龄调节功能的变化,干预参与者=70岁:系数-24.28 [95%CI: -36.53, -12.02])。中介分析显示,总体满意度、治疗相关满意度和症状相关满意度对疼痛(分别为-0.10、-0.06和-0.08)和功能(分别为0.09、0.05和0.07)的平均变化有显著的间接影响。结论:与老年组相比,年轻的PARTNER参与者表现出更大的功能改善(调节效应)。此外,间接中介效应表明,三个满意度域的满意度增加导致膝关节疼痛减轻和功能增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moderators and mediators of pain and function outcomes in a new service delivery model for management of knee osteoarthritis in primary care (PARTNER): Secondary exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: Explore moderators and mediators influenced changes in pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) receiving a new model of primary care service delivery (PARTNER), at 12 months (ACTRN12617001595303).

Methods: Secondary analyses of a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing PARTNER to usual general practitioner-delivered care (n=217, 112 PARTNER, 105 usual care) on knee pain/function. Pain was measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (range 0-10, higher= worse) and the function measured using the function subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (range 0-100, higher= better). Baseline variables selected as potential moderators included age, sex, body mass index, pain duration, residential state, living arrangements, education, employment status, back pain and other joint issues. Mediation variables included physical activity, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, OA self-management, self-efficacy, sleep, fatigue, quality-of-life, depression, and satisfaction.

Results: For change in pain, no moderators influenced the intervention effect. However, age moderated change in function, with intervention participants <50 years demonstrating greater functional improvement than older counterparts, compared to the control group (50-69 years: coefficient -32.88 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): -45.02, -20.74], >=70 years: coefficient -24.28 [95%CI: -36.53, -12.02]). Mediation analysis revealed significant indirect effects of overall, treatment-related, and symptom-related satisfaction on mean change in pain (-0.10, -0.06, and -0.08, respectively) and function (0.09, 0.05, and 0.07, respectively).

Conclusion: Younger PARTNER participants showed greater functional improvement compared to older age groups (moderating effect). Additionally, indirect mediation effects suggest increased satisfaction across the three satisfaction domains led to reduced knee pain and enhanced function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信