以辅助为中心:医院免税之争的一种选择。

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
American Journal of Law & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1017/amj.2025.20
Ellen E Farwell
{"title":"以辅助为中心:医院免税之争的一种选择。","authors":"Ellen E Farwell","doi":"10.1017/amj.2025.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a seemingly intractable disagreement about whether nonprofit hospitals can be meaningfully differentiated from their for-profit counterparts and are therefore still deserving of exemption from federal income tax. Nonprofit, tax-exempt hospitals are intended to be organized and operated for charitable purposes. What this means and requires has evolved from providing relief for the sick and poor to promoting community health and more. At the same time, these institutions have evolved into complex, highly regulated business organizations, some of which struggle to differentiate themselves from their for-profit competitors. The history of American hospitals from almshouses to today's complex health care systems includes, and is better understood in the context of, the stories of how women's hospital auxiliary organizations built, supported, and evolved with hospitals.While acknowledging the enduring debate regarding exemption, this article attempts to address the question of how to fill the charitable gap if exempt hospitals were to lose or voluntarily relinquish their preferred tax status. The article recommends preserving the ability to address community and individual health needs through charitable hospital auxiliaries. Auxiliaries are uniquely situated in an increasingly commercial healthcare market, due both to their history and community connections, to hold and direct the use of charitable assets, to accept tax-deductible charitable contributions, and to address unmet community needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7680,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","volume":"51 1","pages":"125-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centering the Auxiliary: An Alternative in the Hospital Tax-Exemption Debate.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen E Farwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/amj.2025.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a seemingly intractable disagreement about whether nonprofit hospitals can be meaningfully differentiated from their for-profit counterparts and are therefore still deserving of exemption from federal income tax. Nonprofit, tax-exempt hospitals are intended to be organized and operated for charitable purposes. What this means and requires has evolved from providing relief for the sick and poor to promoting community health and more. At the same time, these institutions have evolved into complex, highly regulated business organizations, some of which struggle to differentiate themselves from their for-profit competitors. The history of American hospitals from almshouses to today's complex health care systems includes, and is better understood in the context of, the stories of how women's hospital auxiliary organizations built, supported, and evolved with hospitals.While acknowledging the enduring debate regarding exemption, this article attempts to address the question of how to fill the charitable gap if exempt hospitals were to lose or voluntarily relinquish their preferred tax status. The article recommends preserving the ability to address community and individual health needs through charitable hospital auxiliaries. Auxiliaries are uniquely situated in an increasingly commercial healthcare market, due both to their history and community connections, to hold and direct the use of charitable assets, to accept tax-deductible charitable contributions, and to address unmet community needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Law & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"125-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Law & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2025.20\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2025.20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于非营利性医院是否能与营利性医院有意义的区别,是否仍应免征联邦所得税,似乎存在着难以解决的分歧。非营利性、免税医院旨在为慈善目的而组织和运营。这意味着什么,需要什么,已经从为病人和穷人提供救济发展到促进社区卫生等等。与此同时,这些机构已经演变成复杂的、受到高度监管的商业组织,其中一些机构努力将自己与营利性竞争对手区分开来。从济贫院到今天复杂的医疗保健系统,美国医院的历史包括妇女医院辅助组织如何与医院一起建立、支持和发展的故事,并且在此背景下更好地理解。在承认关于豁免的持久争论的同时,本文试图解决如果豁免医院失去或自愿放弃其优惠税收地位,如何填补慈善缺口的问题。文章建议保留通过慈善医院附属机构解决社区和个人健康需求的能力。由于其历史和社区联系,辅助机构在日益商业化的医疗保健市场中处于独特地位,可以持有和指导慈善资产的使用,接受免税的慈善捐款,并解决未满足的社区需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Centering the Auxiliary: An Alternative in the Hospital Tax-Exemption Debate.

There is a seemingly intractable disagreement about whether nonprofit hospitals can be meaningfully differentiated from their for-profit counterparts and are therefore still deserving of exemption from federal income tax. Nonprofit, tax-exempt hospitals are intended to be organized and operated for charitable purposes. What this means and requires has evolved from providing relief for the sick and poor to promoting community health and more. At the same time, these institutions have evolved into complex, highly regulated business organizations, some of which struggle to differentiate themselves from their for-profit competitors. The history of American hospitals from almshouses to today's complex health care systems includes, and is better understood in the context of, the stories of how women's hospital auxiliary organizations built, supported, and evolved with hospitals.While acknowledging the enduring debate regarding exemption, this article attempts to address the question of how to fill the charitable gap if exempt hospitals were to lose or voluntarily relinquish their preferred tax status. The article recommends preserving the ability to address community and individual health needs through charitable hospital auxiliaries. Auxiliaries are uniquely situated in an increasingly commercial healthcare market, due both to their history and community connections, to hold and direct the use of charitable assets, to accept tax-deductible charitable contributions, and to address unmet community needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: desde Enero 2004 Último Numero: Octubre 2008 AJLM will solicit blind comments from expert peer reviewers, including faculty members of our editorial board, as well as from other preeminent health law and public policy academics and professionals from across the country and around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信