术中细胞抢救器械的质量控制与维护。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Jae Won Lee, Suk Won Seo, Yousun Chung, Hyungsuk Kim, Sang-Hyun Hwang, Heung-Beom Oh, Han Joo Kim, Dae-Hyun Ko
{"title":"术中细胞抢救器械的质量控制与维护。","authors":"Jae Won Lee, Suk Won Seo, Yousun Chung, Hyungsuk Kim, Sang-Hyun Hwang, Heung-Beom Oh, Han Joo Kim, Dae-Hyun Ko","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqaf027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is broadly used in high-risk surgical procedures to facilitate rapid autologous red blood cell transfusion, minimizing the need for allogeneic blood and its associated risks. However, standardized guidelines are lacking for the quality control of ICS devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed biannual quality control tests performed on 8 ICS devices at our institution between 2017 and 2023. The quality control assessments included visual inspection for hemolysis, albumin levels, potassium (K+) levels, and free hemoglobin levels, as well as microbial cultures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 90 quality control tests, albumin and K+ levels were consistently within acceptable ranges. However, visual inspections revealed 14 and 20 instances of unacceptable hemolysis and free hemoglobin levels, respectively. Two devices exhibited higher frequencies of these unacceptable outcomes. Most microbial cultures identified contaminants, with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the only notable pathogen. Follow-up simulations demonstrated acceptable performance, indicating equipment reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the need for standardized quality control protocols for ICS devices. Although current guidelines are limited, our biannual quality control standard is both practical and effective. We hope our findings provide a framework for other institutions aiming to optimize ICS device performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality control and maintenance of intraoperative cell salvage instruments.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Won Lee, Suk Won Seo, Yousun Chung, Hyungsuk Kim, Sang-Hyun Hwang, Heung-Beom Oh, Han Joo Kim, Dae-Hyun Ko\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajcp/aqaf027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is broadly used in high-risk surgical procedures to facilitate rapid autologous red blood cell transfusion, minimizing the need for allogeneic blood and its associated risks. However, standardized guidelines are lacking for the quality control of ICS devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed biannual quality control tests performed on 8 ICS devices at our institution between 2017 and 2023. The quality control assessments included visual inspection for hemolysis, albumin levels, potassium (K+) levels, and free hemoglobin levels, as well as microbial cultures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 90 quality control tests, albumin and K+ levels were consistently within acceptable ranges. However, visual inspections revealed 14 and 20 instances of unacceptable hemolysis and free hemoglobin levels, respectively. Two devices exhibited higher frequencies of these unacceptable outcomes. Most microbial cultures identified contaminants, with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the only notable pathogen. Follow-up simulations demonstrated acceptable performance, indicating equipment reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the need for standardized quality control protocols for ICS devices. Although current guidelines are limited, our biannual quality control standard is both practical and effective. We hope our findings provide a framework for other institutions aiming to optimize ICS device performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:术中细胞回收(ICS)广泛应用于高危外科手术,以促进快速自体红细胞输血,最大限度地减少对异体血液的需求及其相关风险。然而,ICS设备的质量控制缺乏标准化的指导方针。方法:我们回顾性评估了2017年至2023年在我们机构对8个ICS装置进行的一年两次的质量控制测试。质量控制评估包括目视检查溶血、白蛋白水平、钾(K+)水平和游离血红蛋白水平,以及微生物培养。结果:90项质控试验中,白蛋白和钾离子水平均在可接受范围内。然而,目视检查分别显示14例和20例溶血和游离血红蛋白水平不合格。有两种设备出现这些不可接受结果的频率更高。大多数微生物培养鉴定出污染物,肺炎克雷伯菌是唯一值得注意的病原体。后续模拟显示了可接受的性能,表明设备的可靠性。结论:我们的研究结果强调了ICS设备标准化质量控制协议的必要性。虽然目前的指导方针是有限的,但我们一年两次的质量控制标准是实用和有效的。我们希望我们的发现能为其他旨在优化ICS设备性能的机构提供一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality control and maintenance of intraoperative cell salvage instruments.

Objectives: Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is broadly used in high-risk surgical procedures to facilitate rapid autologous red blood cell transfusion, minimizing the need for allogeneic blood and its associated risks. However, standardized guidelines are lacking for the quality control of ICS devices.

Methods: We retrospectively assessed biannual quality control tests performed on 8 ICS devices at our institution between 2017 and 2023. The quality control assessments included visual inspection for hemolysis, albumin levels, potassium (K+) levels, and free hemoglobin levels, as well as microbial cultures.

Results: Among 90 quality control tests, albumin and K+ levels were consistently within acceptable ranges. However, visual inspections revealed 14 and 20 instances of unacceptable hemolysis and free hemoglobin levels, respectively. Two devices exhibited higher frequencies of these unacceptable outcomes. Most microbial cultures identified contaminants, with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the only notable pathogen. Follow-up simulations demonstrated acceptable performance, indicating equipment reliability.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need for standardized quality control protocols for ICS devices. Although current guidelines are limited, our biannual quality control standard is both practical and effective. We hope our findings provide a framework for other institutions aiming to optimize ICS device performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信