Chuanqiang Dai, Youshu Zhang, Guifang Wu, Yao Zhang, Yao Dong
{"title":"髓核减压、同种异体腓骨固定和带蒂腓骨植骨是治疗股骨头坏死的有效方法。","authors":"Chuanqiang Dai, Youshu Zhang, Guifang Wu, Yao Zhang, Yao Dong","doi":"10.62347/SRDE9412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the application effects of core decompression, allograft fibula fixation, and pedicled fibula grafting in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients with ONFH admitted to Ziyang Central Hospital from March 2017 to March 2022 were included in this study. According to the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging criteria, 20 patients at stage I underwent core decompression, 8 patients at stage II underwent core decompression combined with allogenic fibula fixation, and 12 patients at stage III underwent core decompression combined with pedicled fibula grafting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1 year of follow-up, changes in hip joint function (Harris score) and pain level (visual analogue scale (VAS)) were compared before and after surgery. Imaging examination results were recorded, and efficacy and ARCO stage progression were compared with preoperative findings. All 40 patients received follow-up for 1 year. The results showed that the Harris score at 1 year post-operation was higher than pre-operation, while the VAS score was lower (P<0.05). Hip joint function evaluation in the 20 patients at stage I showed excellent, good, and fair results in 12 (60.00%), 5 (25.00%), and 3 (15.00%) cases, respectively, with X-ray examination indicating complete stability and no progression in ARCO staging. Among the 8 patients at stage II, hip joint function evaluation showed excellent, good, fair, and poor results in 4 (50.00%), 2 (25.00%), 1 (12.50%), and 1 (12.50%) cases, respectively. X-ray examination revealed stability in 7 cases, while 1 case progressed to ARCO stage IV and ultimately required artificial hip arthroplasty. Among the 12 patients at stage III, hip joint function evaluation revealed excellent, good, fair, and poor results in 5 (41.67%), 3 (25.00%), 2 (16.67%), and 2 (16.67%) cases, respectively. X-ray examination indicated stability in 10 cases, while 2 cases progressed to ARCO stage IV and ultimately required artificial hip arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with stage I, II, and III ONFH achieved good short-term therapeutic outcomes using core decompression, core decompression with allogenic fibula fixation, and core decompression with pedicled fibula grafting. These methods effectively improved hip joint function and alleviated pain symptoms. Hence, it is crucial to select appropriate surgical methods based on the specific conditions of patients in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 3","pages":"1768-1779"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Core decompression, allogenic fibula fixation, and pedicled fibula grafting are effective for osteonecrosis of femoral head.\",\"authors\":\"Chuanqiang Dai, Youshu Zhang, Guifang Wu, Yao Zhang, Yao Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/SRDE9412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the application effects of core decompression, allograft fibula fixation, and pedicled fibula grafting in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients with ONFH admitted to Ziyang Central Hospital from March 2017 to March 2022 were included in this study. According to the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging criteria, 20 patients at stage I underwent core decompression, 8 patients at stage II underwent core decompression combined with allogenic fibula fixation, and 12 patients at stage III underwent core decompression combined with pedicled fibula grafting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1 year of follow-up, changes in hip joint function (Harris score) and pain level (visual analogue scale (VAS)) were compared before and after surgery. Imaging examination results were recorded, and efficacy and ARCO stage progression were compared with preoperative findings. All 40 patients received follow-up for 1 year. The results showed that the Harris score at 1 year post-operation was higher than pre-operation, while the VAS score was lower (P<0.05). Hip joint function evaluation in the 20 patients at stage I showed excellent, good, and fair results in 12 (60.00%), 5 (25.00%), and 3 (15.00%) cases, respectively, with X-ray examination indicating complete stability and no progression in ARCO staging. Among the 8 patients at stage II, hip joint function evaluation showed excellent, good, fair, and poor results in 4 (50.00%), 2 (25.00%), 1 (12.50%), and 1 (12.50%) cases, respectively. X-ray examination revealed stability in 7 cases, while 1 case progressed to ARCO stage IV and ultimately required artificial hip arthroplasty. Among the 12 patients at stage III, hip joint function evaluation revealed excellent, good, fair, and poor results in 5 (41.67%), 3 (25.00%), 2 (16.67%), and 2 (16.67%) cases, respectively. X-ray examination indicated stability in 10 cases, while 2 cases progressed to ARCO stage IV and ultimately required artificial hip arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with stage I, II, and III ONFH achieved good short-term therapeutic outcomes using core decompression, core decompression with allogenic fibula fixation, and core decompression with pedicled fibula grafting. These methods effectively improved hip joint function and alleviated pain symptoms. Hence, it is crucial to select appropriate surgical methods based on the specific conditions of patients in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"1768-1779\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982888/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/SRDE9412\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/SRDE9412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨髓核减压、同种异体腓骨固定及带蒂腓骨移植在股骨头坏死(ONFH)中的应用效果。方法:选取2017年3月至2022年3月在资阳市中心医院住院的40例ONFH患者为研究对象。根据Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO)分期标准,20例I期患者行核减压术,8例II期患者行核减压联合同种异体腓骨固定术,12例III期患者行核减压联合带蒂腓骨移植术。结果:随访1年,比较手术前后髋关节功能(Harris评分)和疼痛程度(视觉模拟评分)的变化。记录影像学检查结果,比较术前疗效和ARCO分期进展。40例患者均随访1年。结果显示,术后1年Harris评分高于术前,VAS评分较术前低(p)。结论:ⅰ、ⅱ、ⅲ期ONFH患者采用核减压、核减压联合同种异体腓骨固定、核减压联合带蒂腓骨植入术均获得较好的短期治疗效果。这些方法有效地改善了髋关节功能,减轻了疼痛症状。因此,在临床实践中,根据患者的具体情况选择合适的手术方法至关重要。
Core decompression, allogenic fibula fixation, and pedicled fibula grafting are effective for osteonecrosis of femoral head.
Objective: To explore the application effects of core decompression, allograft fibula fixation, and pedicled fibula grafting in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).
Methods: Forty patients with ONFH admitted to Ziyang Central Hospital from March 2017 to March 2022 were included in this study. According to the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging criteria, 20 patients at stage I underwent core decompression, 8 patients at stage II underwent core decompression combined with allogenic fibula fixation, and 12 patients at stage III underwent core decompression combined with pedicled fibula grafting.
Results: After 1 year of follow-up, changes in hip joint function (Harris score) and pain level (visual analogue scale (VAS)) were compared before and after surgery. Imaging examination results were recorded, and efficacy and ARCO stage progression were compared with preoperative findings. All 40 patients received follow-up for 1 year. The results showed that the Harris score at 1 year post-operation was higher than pre-operation, while the VAS score was lower (P<0.05). Hip joint function evaluation in the 20 patients at stage I showed excellent, good, and fair results in 12 (60.00%), 5 (25.00%), and 3 (15.00%) cases, respectively, with X-ray examination indicating complete stability and no progression in ARCO staging. Among the 8 patients at stage II, hip joint function evaluation showed excellent, good, fair, and poor results in 4 (50.00%), 2 (25.00%), 1 (12.50%), and 1 (12.50%) cases, respectively. X-ray examination revealed stability in 7 cases, while 1 case progressed to ARCO stage IV and ultimately required artificial hip arthroplasty. Among the 12 patients at stage III, hip joint function evaluation revealed excellent, good, fair, and poor results in 5 (41.67%), 3 (25.00%), 2 (16.67%), and 2 (16.67%) cases, respectively. X-ray examination indicated stability in 10 cases, while 2 cases progressed to ARCO stage IV and ultimately required artificial hip arthroplasty.
Conclusion: Patients with stage I, II, and III ONFH achieved good short-term therapeutic outcomes using core decompression, core decompression with allogenic fibula fixation, and core decompression with pedicled fibula grafting. These methods effectively improved hip joint function and alleviated pain symptoms. Hence, it is crucial to select appropriate surgical methods based on the specific conditions of patients in clinical practice.