系统性硬化症和炎性肌病肺间质性肺病超声诊断标准的验证。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Robert M Fairchild, Diane A Mar, Mariani D Deluna, Melody Chung, Srijana Davuluri, Yumeko Kawano, Henry Guo, Matthew C Baker, David Fiorentino, Lorinda Chung
{"title":"系统性硬化症和炎性肌病肺间质性肺病超声诊断标准的验证。","authors":"Robert M Fairchild, Diane A Mar, Mariani D Deluna, Melody Chung, Srijana Davuluri, Yumeko Kawano, Henry Guo, Matthew C Baker, David Fiorentino, Lorinda Chung","doi":"10.1002/acr.25567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has a high prevalence in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and inflammatory myopathy (IM) and early identification reduces associated morbidity and mortality. We previously developed LUS interpretation criteria for ILD detection in 2020 (LUS-ILD-20) showing excellent sensitivity and specificity in SSc-ILD; herein, we sought to validate revised LUS-ILD-24 in a large SSc and IM cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients meeting criteria for SSc and IM, with planned CT chest imaging underwent LUS imaging interpreted with LUS-ILD-24 by 3 blinded readers. The sensitivity and specificity for LUS-ILD detection as noted on CT was analyzed for SSc, IM, and possible incident ILD subgroups. Inter- and intra-rater agreement was calculated. Correlations between LUS-ILD-24 severity, CT imaging severity, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five patients were included in the analyses. Sensitivity and specificity for ILD detection ranged from 92.4% to 95.5% and 82.8% to 86.2% across readers with similar accuracy in all subgroups. Inter- and intra-reader reliability showed near perfect agreement (κ = 0.92 and κ = 0.90 to 1, respectively). LUS severity correlated with CT imaging severity and inversely correlated with diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (%DLCO) and forced vital capacity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We validated our revised LUS-ILD-24 in SSc and IM cohorts and found excellent sensitivity, specificity, and reliability for detection of ILD identified on CT. LUS severity correlated with CT and PFT markers of ILD severity. Validation of the revised LUS-ILD-24 supports the implementation of LUS in screening algorithms for ILD in SSc and IM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Lung Ultrasound Interpretation Criteria for Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis and Inflammatory Myopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Robert M Fairchild, Diane A Mar, Mariani D Deluna, Melody Chung, Srijana Davuluri, Yumeko Kawano, Henry Guo, Matthew C Baker, David Fiorentino, Lorinda Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has a high prevalence in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and inflammatory myopathy (IM) and early identification reduces associated morbidity and mortality. We previously developed LUS interpretation criteria for ILD detection in 2020 (LUS-ILD-20) showing excellent sensitivity and specificity in SSc-ILD; herein, we sought to validate revised LUS-ILD-24 in a large SSc and IM cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients meeting criteria for SSc and IM, with planned CT chest imaging underwent LUS imaging interpreted with LUS-ILD-24 by 3 blinded readers. The sensitivity and specificity for LUS-ILD detection as noted on CT was analyzed for SSc, IM, and possible incident ILD subgroups. Inter- and intra-rater agreement was calculated. Correlations between LUS-ILD-24 severity, CT imaging severity, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five patients were included in the analyses. Sensitivity and specificity for ILD detection ranged from 92.4% to 95.5% and 82.8% to 86.2% across readers with similar accuracy in all subgroups. Inter- and intra-reader reliability showed near perfect agreement (κ = 0.92 and κ = 0.90 to 1, respectively). LUS severity correlated with CT imaging severity and inversely correlated with diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (%DLCO) and forced vital capacity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We validated our revised LUS-ILD-24 in SSc and IM cohorts and found excellent sensitivity, specificity, and reliability for detection of ILD identified on CT. LUS severity correlated with CT and PFT markers of ILD severity. Validation of the revised LUS-ILD-24 supports the implementation of LUS in screening algorithms for ILD in SSc and IM patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25567\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:间质性肺疾病(ILD)在系统性硬化症(SSc)和炎症性肌病(IM)中发病率很高,早期发现可降低相关的发病率和死亡率。我们之前在2020年制定了ILD检测的LUS解释标准(LUS-ILD-20),显示出在SSc-ILD中具有出色的敏感性和特异性;在此,我们试图在大型SSc和IM队列中验证修订后的LUS-ILD-24。方法:符合SSc和IM标准的患者,计划进行CT胸部成像,采用LUS- ild -24进行LUS成像,由3名盲法读取器解读。我们分析了CT上LUS-ILD检测的敏感性和特异性,包括SSc、IM和可能发生的ILD亚组。计算了汇率之间和汇率内部的一致性。评估LUS-ILD-24严重程度、CT成像严重程度和肺功能测试(PFTs)之间的相关性。结果:95例患者纳入分析。在所有亚组中,对ILD检测的灵敏度和特异性分别为92.4% - 95.5%和82.8% - 86.2%。读卡器间和读卡器内的可靠性显示出接近完美的一致性(κ分别= 0.92和κ = 0.90 to 1)。LUS严重程度与CT影像严重程度相关,与一氧化碳弥散量(%DLCO)和强制肺活量呈负相关。结论:我们在SSc和IM队列中验证了修订后的ls -ILD-24,并发现在CT上检测ILD具有出色的敏感性、特异性和可靠性。LUS严重程度与ILD严重程度的CT和PFT指标相关。修订后的LUS-ILD-24的验证支持LUS在SSc和IM患者ILD筛查算法中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Lung Ultrasound Interpretation Criteria for Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis and Inflammatory Myopathy.

Objectives: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has a high prevalence in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and inflammatory myopathy (IM) and early identification reduces associated morbidity and mortality. We previously developed LUS interpretation criteria for ILD detection in 2020 (LUS-ILD-20) showing excellent sensitivity and specificity in SSc-ILD; herein, we sought to validate revised LUS-ILD-24 in a large SSc and IM cohort.

Methods: Patients meeting criteria for SSc and IM, with planned CT chest imaging underwent LUS imaging interpreted with LUS-ILD-24 by 3 blinded readers. The sensitivity and specificity for LUS-ILD detection as noted on CT was analyzed for SSc, IM, and possible incident ILD subgroups. Inter- and intra-rater agreement was calculated. Correlations between LUS-ILD-24 severity, CT imaging severity, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were assessed.

Results: Ninety-five patients were included in the analyses. Sensitivity and specificity for ILD detection ranged from 92.4% to 95.5% and 82.8% to 86.2% across readers with similar accuracy in all subgroups. Inter- and intra-reader reliability showed near perfect agreement (κ = 0.92 and κ = 0.90 to 1, respectively). LUS severity correlated with CT imaging severity and inversely correlated with diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (%DLCO) and forced vital capacity.

Conclusion: We validated our revised LUS-ILD-24 in SSc and IM cohorts and found excellent sensitivity, specificity, and reliability for detection of ILD identified on CT. LUS severity correlated with CT and PFT markers of ILD severity. Validation of the revised LUS-ILD-24 supports the implementation of LUS in screening algorithms for ILD in SSc and IM patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信