Anish Kirpalani, Théo Viel, Zixuan Hu, Hui Ming Lin, Sebastiaan Hermans, David Gomez, Robert Moreland, Shobhit Mathur, Aaditeya Jhaveri, Matthew Wu, Paraskevi A Vlachou, Monica Tafur, Ervin Sejdić, Errol Colak
{"title":"RSNA 2023腹部创伤AI挑战高性能机器学习模型在脾损伤CT检测和分级中的外部验证","authors":"Anish Kirpalani, Théo Viel, Zixuan Hu, Hui Ming Lin, Sebastiaan Hermans, David Gomez, Robert Moreland, Shobhit Mathur, Aaditeya Jhaveri, Matthew Wu, Paraskevi A Vlachou, Monica Tafur, Ervin Sejdić, Errol Colak","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04910-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to validate the performance of an award-winning machine learning (ML) model from the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge in detecting splenic injuries on CT scans using a large, geographically and temporally distinct external dataset.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-center retrospective study was conducted using an external dataset comprising 1216 CT scans (608 positive and 608 negative for splenic injuries). The ML model, trained on the RSNA Abdominal Traumatic Injury CT (RATIC) dataset, employs a multi-component pipeline including 2D MaxVit, 2.5D CoatNet with LSTM for study-level predictions. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, F1 score, and AUC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ML model achieved an AUC of 0.931 (95% CI: 0.917, 0.945) for binary classification of splenic injuries, with an accuracy of 0.849 (95% CI: 0.827, 0.868), sensitivity of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.711, 0.780), and specificity of 0.951 (95% CI: 0.930, 0.965). For high-grade splenic injuries, the model achieved an AUC of 0.950 (95% CI: 0.932, 0.968), accuracy of 0.928 (95% CI: 0.912, 0.941), sensitivity of 0.719 (95% CI: 0.643, 0.784), and specificity of 0.958 (95% CI: 0.944, 0.968).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ML model shows strong, reliable performance and generalizability in detecting and grading splenic injuries on CT scans. This supports its potential clinical application, particularly for quick and accurate diagnosis in splenic trauma patients, and highlights the value of RSNA AI challenges in advancing clinical research and applications in medical imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of an RSNA 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge high performing machine learning model in the detection and grading of splenic injuries on CT.\",\"authors\":\"Anish Kirpalani, Théo Viel, Zixuan Hu, Hui Ming Lin, Sebastiaan Hermans, David Gomez, Robert Moreland, Shobhit Mathur, Aaditeya Jhaveri, Matthew Wu, Paraskevi A Vlachou, Monica Tafur, Ervin Sejdić, Errol Colak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04910-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to validate the performance of an award-winning machine learning (ML) model from the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge in detecting splenic injuries on CT scans using a large, geographically and temporally distinct external dataset.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-center retrospective study was conducted using an external dataset comprising 1216 CT scans (608 positive and 608 negative for splenic injuries). The ML model, trained on the RSNA Abdominal Traumatic Injury CT (RATIC) dataset, employs a multi-component pipeline including 2D MaxVit, 2.5D CoatNet with LSTM for study-level predictions. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, F1 score, and AUC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ML model achieved an AUC of 0.931 (95% CI: 0.917, 0.945) for binary classification of splenic injuries, with an accuracy of 0.849 (95% CI: 0.827, 0.868), sensitivity of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.711, 0.780), and specificity of 0.951 (95% CI: 0.930, 0.965). For high-grade splenic injuries, the model achieved an AUC of 0.950 (95% CI: 0.932, 0.968), accuracy of 0.928 (95% CI: 0.912, 0.941), sensitivity of 0.719 (95% CI: 0.643, 0.784), and specificity of 0.958 (95% CI: 0.944, 0.968).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ML model shows strong, reliable performance and generalizability in detecting and grading splenic injuries on CT scans. This supports its potential clinical application, particularly for quick and accurate diagnosis in splenic trauma patients, and highlights the value of RSNA AI challenges in advancing clinical research and applications in medical imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04910-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04910-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
External validation of an RSNA 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge high performing machine learning model in the detection and grading of splenic injuries on CT.
Purpose: This study aims to validate the performance of an award-winning machine learning (ML) model from the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge in detecting splenic injuries on CT scans using a large, geographically and temporally distinct external dataset.
Method: A single-center retrospective study was conducted using an external dataset comprising 1216 CT scans (608 positive and 608 negative for splenic injuries). The ML model, trained on the RSNA Abdominal Traumatic Injury CT (RATIC) dataset, employs a multi-component pipeline including 2D MaxVit, 2.5D CoatNet with LSTM for study-level predictions. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, F1 score, and AUC.
Results: The ML model achieved an AUC of 0.931 (95% CI: 0.917, 0.945) for binary classification of splenic injuries, with an accuracy of 0.849 (95% CI: 0.827, 0.868), sensitivity of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.711, 0.780), and specificity of 0.951 (95% CI: 0.930, 0.965). For high-grade splenic injuries, the model achieved an AUC of 0.950 (95% CI: 0.932, 0.968), accuracy of 0.928 (95% CI: 0.912, 0.941), sensitivity of 0.719 (95% CI: 0.643, 0.784), and specificity of 0.958 (95% CI: 0.944, 0.968).
Conclusion: The ML model shows strong, reliable performance and generalizability in detecting and grading splenic injuries on CT scans. This supports its potential clinical application, particularly for quick and accurate diagnosis in splenic trauma patients, and highlights the value of RSNA AI challenges in advancing clinical research and applications in medical imaging.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits