门静脉/肠系膜上静脉基台角度对胰腺癌预后的影响:一项单中心回顾性队列研究

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Hye Jeong Jeong, DanHui Heo, Soo Yeun Lim, Hyeong Seok Kim, Hochang Chae, So Jeong Yoon, Sang Hyun Shin, In Woong Han, Jin Seok Heo, Ji Hye Min, Hongbeom Kim
{"title":"门静脉/肠系膜上静脉基台角度对胰腺癌预后的影响:一项单中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Hye Jeong Jeong, DanHui Heo, Soo Yeun Lim, Hyeong Seok Kim, Hochang Chae, So Jeong Yoon, Sang Hyun Shin, In Woong Han, Jin Seok Heo, Ji Hye Min, Hongbeom Kim","doi":"10.4174/astr.2025.108.4.231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis; however, the implementation of neoadjuvant treatment enables borderline resectable cases to undergo curative resection and improves the overall survival rate. Attempts have been made to expand the eligibility criteria for neoadjuvant treatment, even in resectable cases. Some studies have suggested a correlation between vein abutment and poor prognosis or that the abutment angle may affect prognosis. This study investigated the anatomical factors affecting the vessel abutment angle and its prognostic value in pancreatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2017 were included in this study. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. Data from only the intent-to-treat pancreaticoduodenectomy group were included in the analysis. Clinicopathological characteristics; preoperative factors such as CA 19-9, preoperative biliary drainage, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, portal vein/superior mesenteric vein contact angle measured via CT scan; and intraoperative factors were collected for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 365 patients were included in this study, and the abutment group included 92 patients (25.2%). The abutment and no-contact groups did not show any significant differences in terms of the overall survival or disease-free survival rate. Among the abutment groups, patients with less than 90° and 90°-180° did not show any significant differences. In the multivariate analysis, the only preoperative factor that had a prognostic effect was CA 19-9, a biological factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When there is no vessel invasion in the abutment group, upfront surgery should be considered because the angle does not affect the overall prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":"108 4","pages":"231-239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of portal/superior mesenteric vein abutment angle on prognosis in pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Hye Jeong Jeong, DanHui Heo, Soo Yeun Lim, Hyeong Seok Kim, Hochang Chae, So Jeong Yoon, Sang Hyun Shin, In Woong Han, Jin Seok Heo, Ji Hye Min, Hongbeom Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/astr.2025.108.4.231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis; however, the implementation of neoadjuvant treatment enables borderline resectable cases to undergo curative resection and improves the overall survival rate. Attempts have been made to expand the eligibility criteria for neoadjuvant treatment, even in resectable cases. Some studies have suggested a correlation between vein abutment and poor prognosis or that the abutment angle may affect prognosis. This study investigated the anatomical factors affecting the vessel abutment angle and its prognostic value in pancreatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2017 were included in this study. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. Data from only the intent-to-treat pancreaticoduodenectomy group were included in the analysis. Clinicopathological characteristics; preoperative factors such as CA 19-9, preoperative biliary drainage, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, portal vein/superior mesenteric vein contact angle measured via CT scan; and intraoperative factors were collected for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 365 patients were included in this study, and the abutment group included 92 patients (25.2%). The abutment and no-contact groups did not show any significant differences in terms of the overall survival or disease-free survival rate. Among the abutment groups, patients with less than 90° and 90°-180° did not show any significant differences. In the multivariate analysis, the only preoperative factor that had a prognostic effect was CA 19-9, a biological factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When there is no vessel invasion in the abutment group, upfront surgery should be considered because the angle does not affect the overall prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"volume\":\"108 4\",\"pages\":\"231-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982446/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.108.4.231\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.108.4.231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胰腺癌预后较差;然而,新辅助治疗的实施使边缘可切除的病例能够进行根治性切除并提高总生存率。已经尝试扩大新辅助治疗的资格标准,甚至在可切除的病例中。一些研究认为静脉基牙与预后不良有关,或者基牙角度可能影响预后。本研究探讨影响胰腺癌血管基台角度的解剖学因素及其预后价值。方法:本研究纳入2012年至2017年期间接受手术治疗的胰腺导管腺癌患者。接受新辅助治疗的患者排除在外。只有意向治疗胰十二指肠切除术组的数据被纳入分析。临床病理的特点;术前因素如CA 19-9、术前胆道引流、美国麻醉学会身体状态分类、门静脉/肠系膜上静脉CT扫描接触角;并收集术中因素进行分析。结果:本研究共纳入365例患者,其中基牙组92例(25.2%)。基台组和非接触组在总生存率和无病生存率方面没有显着差异。在基台组中,小于90°和90°-180°患者无显著性差异。在多因素分析中,唯一影响预后的术前因素是CA 19-9,这是一个生物学因素。结论:当基台组无血管侵犯时,由于角度不影响整体预后,可考虑进行前期手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of portal/superior mesenteric vein abutment angle on prognosis in pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis; however, the implementation of neoadjuvant treatment enables borderline resectable cases to undergo curative resection and improves the overall survival rate. Attempts have been made to expand the eligibility criteria for neoadjuvant treatment, even in resectable cases. Some studies have suggested a correlation between vein abutment and poor prognosis or that the abutment angle may affect prognosis. This study investigated the anatomical factors affecting the vessel abutment angle and its prognostic value in pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2017 were included in this study. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. Data from only the intent-to-treat pancreaticoduodenectomy group were included in the analysis. Clinicopathological characteristics; preoperative factors such as CA 19-9, preoperative biliary drainage, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, portal vein/superior mesenteric vein contact angle measured via CT scan; and intraoperative factors were collected for analysis.

Results: A total of 365 patients were included in this study, and the abutment group included 92 patients (25.2%). The abutment and no-contact groups did not show any significant differences in terms of the overall survival or disease-free survival rate. Among the abutment groups, patients with less than 90° and 90°-180° did not show any significant differences. In the multivariate analysis, the only preoperative factor that had a prognostic effect was CA 19-9, a biological factor.

Conclusion: When there is no vessel invasion in the abutment group, upfront surgery should be considered because the angle does not affect the overall prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信