不对称听力损失患者中期人工耳蜗植入的评价。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Isabelle Mosnier, Remy Louvel, Yann Nguyen, Renato Torres, Evelyne Ferrary, Hannah Daoudi, Ghizlène Lahlou
{"title":"不对称听力损失患者中期人工耳蜗植入的评价。","authors":"Isabelle Mosnier, Remy Louvel, Yann Nguyen, Renato Torres, Evelyne Ferrary, Hannah Daoudi, Ghizlène Lahlou","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09366-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cochlear implant (CI) effectiveness in asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) is well established, but CI use over time and daily usage are rarely monitored by health care systems. Continued use of the CI after the first year could be considered an indirect indicator of subjective benefit. The objective of this study was to evaluate CI use with a follow-up period of 5 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-four patients were included in this retrospective study. AHL candidates included patients with an aided speech perception score (SPS) < 50% at 60 dB in the ear to be implanted. The better ear had to have a non-fluctuating HL, and an aided SPS ≥ 60% for disyllabic words in quiet, with an interaural SPS gap ≥ 40%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven percent of patients still used their CI all day at 1-year and 93% at 5-years post-implantation. Only four patients discontinued use. The mean duration of daily use at 5-years assessed using data-logging was 12 ± 3.2 h. Aided SPS for the implanted ear improved at 1-year post-implantation, for both mono- and disyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise (p < 0.0001), and remained stable at 5-years. Unaided and aided SPS of the acoustic ear decreased over time. However, SPS in bimodal conditions improved at 1-year for both mono- (p < 0.0001) and disyllabic words (p < 0.005) and sentences in noise (p < 0.0005) and the scores remained stable at 5-years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low percentage of non-users and the long duration of daily use at 5 years post-implantation are an additional strong argument to recommend cochlear implantation in patients with asymmetric hearing aid benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"4527-4536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of medium-term cochlear implant use in patients with asymmetric hearing loss.\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Mosnier, Remy Louvel, Yann Nguyen, Renato Torres, Evelyne Ferrary, Hannah Daoudi, Ghizlène Lahlou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-025-09366-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cochlear implant (CI) effectiveness in asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) is well established, but CI use over time and daily usage are rarely monitored by health care systems. Continued use of the CI after the first year could be considered an indirect indicator of subjective benefit. The objective of this study was to evaluate CI use with a follow-up period of 5 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-four patients were included in this retrospective study. AHL candidates included patients with an aided speech perception score (SPS) < 50% at 60 dB in the ear to be implanted. The better ear had to have a non-fluctuating HL, and an aided SPS ≥ 60% for disyllabic words in quiet, with an interaural SPS gap ≥ 40%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven percent of patients still used their CI all day at 1-year and 93% at 5-years post-implantation. Only four patients discontinued use. The mean duration of daily use at 5-years assessed using data-logging was 12 ± 3.2 h. Aided SPS for the implanted ear improved at 1-year post-implantation, for both mono- and disyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise (p < 0.0001), and remained stable at 5-years. Unaided and aided SPS of the acoustic ear decreased over time. However, SPS in bimodal conditions improved at 1-year for both mono- (p < 0.0001) and disyllabic words (p < 0.005) and sentences in noise (p < 0.0005) and the scores remained stable at 5-years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low percentage of non-users and the long duration of daily use at 5 years post-implantation are an additional strong argument to recommend cochlear implantation in patients with asymmetric hearing aid benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4527-4536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09366-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09366-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人工耳蜗(CI)在非对称听力损失(AHL)中的有效性已经得到了很好的证实,但是人工耳蜗的长期使用和日常使用很少被卫生保健系统监测。第一年后继续使用CI可被视为主观获益的间接指标。本研究的目的是通过5年的随访期来评估CI的使用。材料与方法:回顾性研究64例患者。AHL候选者包括有辅助语音感知评分(SPS)的患者。结果:97%的患者在植入后1年和5年仍然全天使用CI。只有4名患者停止使用。使用数据记录评估的5年平均每日使用时间为12±3.2小时。植入后1年,植入耳的辅助SPS得到改善,无论是安静的单音节词还是双音节词,以及嘈杂的句子(p)。结论:植入后5年非使用者比例低,每日使用时间长,是推荐非对称助听器获益患者植入人工耳蜗的另一个有力证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of medium-term cochlear implant use in patients with asymmetric hearing loss.

Purpose: Cochlear implant (CI) effectiveness in asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) is well established, but CI use over time and daily usage are rarely monitored by health care systems. Continued use of the CI after the first year could be considered an indirect indicator of subjective benefit. The objective of this study was to evaluate CI use with a follow-up period of 5 years.

Materials and methods: Sixty-four patients were included in this retrospective study. AHL candidates included patients with an aided speech perception score (SPS) < 50% at 60 dB in the ear to be implanted. The better ear had to have a non-fluctuating HL, and an aided SPS ≥ 60% for disyllabic words in quiet, with an interaural SPS gap ≥ 40%.

Results: Ninety-seven percent of patients still used their CI all day at 1-year and 93% at 5-years post-implantation. Only four patients discontinued use. The mean duration of daily use at 5-years assessed using data-logging was 12 ± 3.2 h. Aided SPS for the implanted ear improved at 1-year post-implantation, for both mono- and disyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise (p < 0.0001), and remained stable at 5-years. Unaided and aided SPS of the acoustic ear decreased over time. However, SPS in bimodal conditions improved at 1-year for both mono- (p < 0.0001) and disyllabic words (p < 0.005) and sentences in noise (p < 0.0005) and the scores remained stable at 5-years.

Conclusion: The low percentage of non-users and the long duration of daily use at 5 years post-implantation are an additional strong argument to recommend cochlear implantation in patients with asymmetric hearing aid benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信