单眼斜盘综合征儿童近视与周边相对屈光的关系。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jiawei Wang, Shangzhu Zhang, Huijun Jiang, Jialiang Duan, Ruijie Xi, Shaoyi Wang, Jiangnan Wang, Song Chai
{"title":"单眼斜盘综合征儿童近视与周边相对屈光的关系。","authors":"Jiawei Wang, Shangzhu Zhang, Huijun Jiang, Jialiang Duan, Ruijie Xi, Shaoyi Wang, Jiangnan Wang, Song Chai","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04108-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between myopia and relative peripheral refraction in children with monocular Tilted disc syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Jiawei Wang, Shangzhu Zhang, Huijun Jiang, Jialiang Duan, Ruijie Xi, Shaoyi Wang, Jiangnan Wang, Song Chai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12886-025-04108-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04108-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04108-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨儿童单眼斜盘综合征患者的屈光不正和相对外周屈光。方法:本研究是一项单中心、前瞻性、横断面、观察性研究,纳入河北医科大学第二医院儿童眼科5-17岁单眼斜盘综合征患者49例。视盘倾斜眼为研究组,对侧视盘正常眼为对照组,平均球等效度分别为- 3.24 D和- 0.47 D。比较两组最佳矫正视力、球面等效、眼轴长度、倾斜比(定义为最大与最小视盘直径之比)和评估近视相关离焦的相对外周屈光度。Pearson相关分析评估了视盘倾斜与球面等效、轴向长度和总折射差值之间的关系。结果:视盘倾斜与高度近视相关(斜视组为- 3.24±1.83 D,非斜视组为- 0.47±0.72 D)。结论:儿童单眼视盘倾斜综合征患者具有较长的视轴长度、较高的近视球等距和较高的相对外周屈光度。倾斜比越大,相对外周屈光度和眼轴长度越大,近视越严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between myopia and relative peripheral refraction in children with monocular Tilted disc syndrome.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the refractive error and relative peripheral refraction in pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome.

Methods: This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 49 patients from the Pediatric Ophthalmology Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University aged 5-17 years with monocular tilted disc syndrome. Eyes with tilted optic discs formed the study group, and contralateral eyes with normal discs served as controls, with mean spherical equivalents of - 3.24 D and - 0.47 D, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial length, tilt ratio, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum disc diameters, and relative peripheral refraction, assessing myopia-related defocus were compared between groups. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed associations between optic disc tilt and spherical equivalent, axial length, and the total refraction difference value.

Results: Tilted optic discs were associated with significantly greater myopia (- 3.24 ± 1.83 D in tilted eyes and - 0.47 ± 0.72 D in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), longer axial length (24.59 ± 1.04 mm in tilted eyes and 23.45 ± 0.78 mm in non-tilted eyes, P <.001), and a higher tilt ratio (1.43 ± 0.05 in tilted eyes and 1.14 ± 0.04 in non-tilted eyes, P <.001). Discrepancies between tilted and non-tilted eyes were observed in the superior, inferior, and nasal quadrants, and the total refraction difference value (P <.001). In eyes with tilted disc syndrome, a negative correlation was found between the total refraction difference value and the spherical equivalent (P <.001). The tilt ratio of optic disc eyes was significantly greater than that of contralateral eyes and was negatively correlated with the spherical equivalent. There was a positive correlation between the tilt ratio and axial length (P <.001).

Conclusions: Pediatric patients with monocular tilted disc syndrome exhibited longer axial lengths, more myopic spherical equivalent, and more positive relative peripheral refraction. A greater tilt ratio is associated with larger relative peripheral refraction and axial length, corresponding to more severe myopia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信