{"title":"肾动脉栓塞治疗钝性外伤性肾出血的疗效和安全性:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Yongqi Li, Shibing Hu, Wei Ding, Zhongzhi Jia, Tongqing Xue, Liqiang Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04967-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of renal artery embolization (RAE) for the management of blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage treated with RAE across four hospitals from January 2018 to December 2024 were included in the study. Technical and clinical success rates, renal function preservation, side effects and complication were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 71 study patients, the technical success rate of RAE was 100%, and the clinical success rate was 93.0% (66/71). The mean RAE procedure time was 1.2 ± 0.5 h and which was increased with higher American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades, and significantly longer was required for higher AAST grade. The mean infarcted renal area was 38% (range, 15-80%). The average serum creatinine level pre- and 1, 3, 5 and 7 days post-RAE were 95.6 ± 47.1 µmol/L, 99.0 ± 44.3 µmol/L, 88.4 ± 31.7 µmol/L, 85.0 ± 27.5 µmol/L and 78.5 ± 41.1 µmol/L, respectively. Different embolic materials (coils vs. gelatin sponge particles) showed no significant differences in technical and clinical success rates but highlighted cost advantages for gelatin sponge particles (4003.4 ± 1381.9 vs. 1919.4 ± 345.7 CNY; P < 0.001). The most common side effect was fever (42.3%), while no RAE related major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAE is a highly effective and minimally invasive treatment for blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage, with significant success in hemostasis and renal function preservation. Gelatin sponge particles should be used as first line choice for RAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of renal artery embolization for blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage: a multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Yongqi Li, Shibing Hu, Wei Ding, Zhongzhi Jia, Tongqing Xue, Liqiang Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04967-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of renal artery embolization (RAE) for the management of blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage treated with RAE across four hospitals from January 2018 to December 2024 were included in the study. Technical and clinical success rates, renal function preservation, side effects and complication were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 71 study patients, the technical success rate of RAE was 100%, and the clinical success rate was 93.0% (66/71). The mean RAE procedure time was 1.2 ± 0.5 h and which was increased with higher American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades, and significantly longer was required for higher AAST grade. The mean infarcted renal area was 38% (range, 15-80%). The average serum creatinine level pre- and 1, 3, 5 and 7 days post-RAE were 95.6 ± 47.1 µmol/L, 99.0 ± 44.3 µmol/L, 88.4 ± 31.7 µmol/L, 85.0 ± 27.5 µmol/L and 78.5 ± 41.1 µmol/L, respectively. Different embolic materials (coils vs. gelatin sponge particles) showed no significant differences in technical and clinical success rates but highlighted cost advantages for gelatin sponge particles (4003.4 ± 1381.9 vs. 1919.4 ± 345.7 CNY; P < 0.001). The most common side effect was fever (42.3%), while no RAE related major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAE is a highly effective and minimally invasive treatment for blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage, with significant success in hemostasis and renal function preservation. Gelatin sponge particles should be used as first line choice for RAE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04967-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04967-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价肾动脉栓塞治疗外伤性钝性肾出血的疗效和安全性。方法:纳入2018年1月至2024年12月4家医院接受RAE治疗的钝性外伤性肾出血患者。分析技术及临床成功率、肾功能保存情况、不良反应及并发症。结果:71例研究患者中,RAE技术成功率100%,临床成功率93.0%(66/71)。平均RAE手术时间为1.2±0.5 h,随着美国创伤外科协会(AAST)等级的提高,RAE手术时间增加,AAST等级越高,RAE手术时间越长。平均肾梗死面积为38%(范围15-80%)。术后1、3、5、7 d的平均血清肌酐水平分别为95.6±47.1µmol/L、99.0±44.3µmol/L、88.4±31.7µmol/L、85.0±27.5µmol/L和78.5±41.1µmol/L。不同栓塞材料(线圈与明胶海绵颗粒)的技术和临床成功率无显著差异,但明胶海绵颗粒的成本优势突出(4003.4±1381.9 vs 1919.4±345.7元;结论:RAE治疗外伤性钝性肾出血是一种高效、微创的治疗方法,止血和肾功能保存效果显著。明胶海绵颗粒应作为RAE的首选。
Efficacy and safety of renal artery embolization for blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage: a multicenter study.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of renal artery embolization (RAE) for the management of blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage.
Methods: Patients with blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage treated with RAE across four hospitals from January 2018 to December 2024 were included in the study. Technical and clinical success rates, renal function preservation, side effects and complication were analyzed.
Results: In the 71 study patients, the technical success rate of RAE was 100%, and the clinical success rate was 93.0% (66/71). The mean RAE procedure time was 1.2 ± 0.5 h and which was increased with higher American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades, and significantly longer was required for higher AAST grade. The mean infarcted renal area was 38% (range, 15-80%). The average serum creatinine level pre- and 1, 3, 5 and 7 days post-RAE were 95.6 ± 47.1 µmol/L, 99.0 ± 44.3 µmol/L, 88.4 ± 31.7 µmol/L, 85.0 ± 27.5 µmol/L and 78.5 ± 41.1 µmol/L, respectively. Different embolic materials (coils vs. gelatin sponge particles) showed no significant differences in technical and clinical success rates but highlighted cost advantages for gelatin sponge particles (4003.4 ± 1381.9 vs. 1919.4 ± 345.7 CNY; P < 0.001). The most common side effect was fever (42.3%), while no RAE related major complications.
Conclusion: RAE is a highly effective and minimally invasive treatment for blunt traumatic renal hemorrhage, with significant success in hemostasis and renal function preservation. Gelatin sponge particles should be used as first line choice for RAE.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits