新型计算机辅助设计-计算机辅助制造铬钴合金(Sintron)与两种不同类型水泥的剪切强度评价:体外研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Dental Research Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/drj.drj_238_24
Mohammad Mahdi Khanmohammadi, Ezatollah Jalalian, Azita Mazaheri Tehrani, Nozhan Azimi, Arash Zarbakhsh
{"title":"新型计算机辅助设计-计算机辅助制造铬钴合金(Sintron)与两种不同类型水泥的剪切强度评价:体外研究。","authors":"Mohammad Mahdi Khanmohammadi, Ezatollah Jalalian, Azita Mazaheri Tehrani, Nozhan Azimi, Arash Zarbakhsh","doi":"10.4103/drj.drj_238_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Any deficiency or problem in the shear bond strength between restoration and tooth surface can lead to recurrent decay, gingival issues, and associated esthetic concerns. Cement acts as a material to bond restorations to the tooth surface, filling the void space between the tooth and the restoration to establish this bond. This study aims to investigate the bonding strength of two common types of cement - polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate - with Sintron alloy (chromium-cobalt) in dental restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This research is conducted <i>in vitro</i> on 24 Sintron alloy discs cemented with two types of polycarboxylate (Poly-F, Dentsply, US) and zinc phosphate cement (Harvard Cement, Germany) on 24 extracted maxillary central incisors. Teeth were sandblasted with 50-micrometer aluminum oxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) particles. Disc-shaped alloy specimens with specific dimensions were prepared. The specimens were then bonded to the teeth surface using each cement and were subjected to shear bond strength testing using a Universal Testing Machine (Instron, 3367, Canton, MA, USA). An independent sample <i>t</i>-test was performed with <i>P</i> value significance of lower than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The <i>t</i>-test with <i>P</i> = 0.150 showed no significant difference between the zinc phosphate and polycarboxylate cement groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found no statistically significant difference in the bond strength of Sintron alloy when using zinc phosphate and polycarboxylate cement. Therefore, it can be concluded that the bond strength is similar for both cements.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear bond strength evaluation of new computer-aided design - computer-aided manufacturing chromium-cobalt alloy (Sintron) with two different types of cement: An in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Mahdi Khanmohammadi, Ezatollah Jalalian, Azita Mazaheri Tehrani, Nozhan Azimi, Arash Zarbakhsh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/drj.drj_238_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Any deficiency or problem in the shear bond strength between restoration and tooth surface can lead to recurrent decay, gingival issues, and associated esthetic concerns. Cement acts as a material to bond restorations to the tooth surface, filling the void space between the tooth and the restoration to establish this bond. This study aims to investigate the bonding strength of two common types of cement - polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate - with Sintron alloy (chromium-cobalt) in dental restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This research is conducted <i>in vitro</i> on 24 Sintron alloy discs cemented with two types of polycarboxylate (Poly-F, Dentsply, US) and zinc phosphate cement (Harvard Cement, Germany) on 24 extracted maxillary central incisors. Teeth were sandblasted with 50-micrometer aluminum oxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) particles. Disc-shaped alloy specimens with specific dimensions were prepared. The specimens were then bonded to the teeth surface using each cement and were subjected to shear bond strength testing using a Universal Testing Machine (Instron, 3367, Canton, MA, USA). An independent sample <i>t</i>-test was performed with <i>P</i> value significance of lower than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The <i>t</i>-test with <i>P</i> = 0.150 showed no significant difference between the zinc phosphate and polycarboxylate cement groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found no statistically significant difference in the bond strength of Sintron alloy when using zinc phosphate and polycarboxylate cement. Therefore, it can be concluded that the bond strength is similar for both cements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063988/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_238_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_238_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:修复体与牙面之间的剪切结合强度的任何缺陷或问题都可能导致复发性蛀牙,牙龈问题和相关的美学问题。骨水泥作为一种材料,将修复体粘接在牙齿表面,填补牙齿和修复体之间的空隙,建立这种粘接。本研究旨在探讨两种常见的水泥-聚羧酸盐和磷酸锌-与辛特隆合金(铬钴)在牙科修复体中的结合强度。材料与方法:本研究采用两种聚羧酸盐(Poly-F, Dentsply,美国)和磷酸锌水泥(Harvard cement,德国)在24个拔除的上颌中门牙上进行24个Sintron合金盘的体外粘接。牙齿用50微米的氧化铝(Al2O3)颗粒喷砂。制备了具有特定尺寸的圆盘状合金试样。然后使用每种水泥将试件粘结在牙齿表面,并使用万能试验机(Instron, 3367, Canton, MA, USA)进行剪切粘结强度测试。进行独立样本t检验,P值显著性低于0.05。结果:经P = 0.150的t检验,磷酸锌和聚羧酸水泥组间无显著性差异。结论:本研究发现磷酸锌与聚羧酸盐水泥对Sintron合金粘结强度的影响无统计学差异。由此可见,两种胶结物的粘结强度相近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shear bond strength evaluation of new computer-aided design - computer-aided manufacturing chromium-cobalt alloy (Sintron) with two different types of cement: An in vitro study.

Background: Any deficiency or problem in the shear bond strength between restoration and tooth surface can lead to recurrent decay, gingival issues, and associated esthetic concerns. Cement acts as a material to bond restorations to the tooth surface, filling the void space between the tooth and the restoration to establish this bond. This study aims to investigate the bonding strength of two common types of cement - polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate - with Sintron alloy (chromium-cobalt) in dental restorations.

Materials and methods: This research is conducted in vitro on 24 Sintron alloy discs cemented with two types of polycarboxylate (Poly-F, Dentsply, US) and zinc phosphate cement (Harvard Cement, Germany) on 24 extracted maxillary central incisors. Teeth were sandblasted with 50-micrometer aluminum oxide (Al2O3) particles. Disc-shaped alloy specimens with specific dimensions were prepared. The specimens were then bonded to the teeth surface using each cement and were subjected to shear bond strength testing using a Universal Testing Machine (Instron, 3367, Canton, MA, USA). An independent sample t-test was performed with P value significance of lower than 0.05.

Results: The t-test with P = 0.150 showed no significant difference between the zinc phosphate and polycarboxylate cement groups.

Conclusion: The study found no statistically significant difference in the bond strength of Sintron alloy when using zinc phosphate and polycarboxylate cement. Therefore, it can be concluded that the bond strength is similar for both cements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信