基于深度学习模型的非增强CT图像肾血管分割。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hai Zhong, Yuan Zhao, Yumeng Zhang
{"title":"基于深度学习模型的非增强CT图像肾血管分割。","authors":"Hai Zhong, Yuan Zhao, Yumeng Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04984-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the possibility of performing renal vessel reconstruction on non-enhanced CT images using deep learning models.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>177 patients' CT scans in the non-enhanced phase, arterial phase and venous phase were chosen. These data were randomly divided into the training set (n = 120), validation set (n = 20) and test set (n = 37). In training set and validation set, a radiologist marked out the right renal arteries and veins on non-enhanced CT phase images using contrast phases as references. Trained deep learning models were tested and evaluated on the test set. A radiologist performed renal vessel reconstruction on the test set without the contrast phase reference, and the results were used for comparison. Reconstruction using the arterial phase and venous phase was used as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without the contrast phase reference, both radiologist and model could accurately identify artery and vein main trunk. The accuracy was 91.9% vs. 97.3% (model vs. radiologist) in artery and 91.9% vs. 100% in vein, the difference was insignificant. The model had difficulty identify accessory arteries, the accuracy was significantly lower than radiologist (44.4% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.044). The model also had lower accuracy in accessory veins, but the difference was insignificant (64.3% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.094).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning models could accurately recognize the right renal artery and vein main trunk, and accuracy was comparable to that of radiologists. Although the current model still had difficulty recognizing small accessory vessels, further training and model optimization would solve these problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Segmentation of renal vessels on non-enhanced CT images using deep learning models.\",\"authors\":\"Hai Zhong, Yuan Zhao, Yumeng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04984-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the possibility of performing renal vessel reconstruction on non-enhanced CT images using deep learning models.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>177 patients' CT scans in the non-enhanced phase, arterial phase and venous phase were chosen. These data were randomly divided into the training set (n = 120), validation set (n = 20) and test set (n = 37). In training set and validation set, a radiologist marked out the right renal arteries and veins on non-enhanced CT phase images using contrast phases as references. Trained deep learning models were tested and evaluated on the test set. A radiologist performed renal vessel reconstruction on the test set without the contrast phase reference, and the results were used for comparison. Reconstruction using the arterial phase and venous phase was used as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without the contrast phase reference, both radiologist and model could accurately identify artery and vein main trunk. The accuracy was 91.9% vs. 97.3% (model vs. radiologist) in artery and 91.9% vs. 100% in vein, the difference was insignificant. The model had difficulty identify accessory arteries, the accuracy was significantly lower than radiologist (44.4% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.044). The model also had lower accuracy in accessory veins, but the difference was insignificant (64.3% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.094).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning models could accurately recognize the right renal artery and vein main trunk, and accuracy was comparable to that of radiologists. Although the current model still had difficulty recognizing small accessory vessels, further training and model optimization would solve these problems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04984-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04984-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨利用深度学习模型对非增强CT图像进行肾血管重建的可能性。材料与方法:选取177例患者非增强期、动脉期和静脉期的CT扫描。这些数据被随机分为训练集(n = 120)、验证集(n = 20)和测试集(n = 37)。在训练集和验证集中,放射科医生以对比期为参考,在非增强CT期图像上标记出右侧肾动静脉。在测试集上对训练好的深度学习模型进行测试和评估。放射科医生在没有对比期参考的情况下对测试集进行肾血管重建,并将结果用于比较。以动脉期和静脉期重建为金标准。结果:在没有对比期参考的情况下,放射科医师和模型均能准确识别动脉和静脉主干。动脉的准确率为91.9% vs. 97.3%(模型vs.放射科医师),静脉的准确率为91.9% vs. 100%,差异不显著。模型识别副动脉有困难,准确率明显低于放射科医师(44.4%比77.8%,p = 0.044)。该模型对副静脉的准确率也较低,但差异不显著(64.3% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.094)。结论:深度学习模型能够准确识别右侧肾动静脉主干,准确率与放射科医师相当。虽然目前的模型在识别小附属血管方面仍然存在困难,但进一步的训练和模型优化将会解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Segmentation of renal vessels on non-enhanced CT images using deep learning models.

Objective: To evaluate the possibility of performing renal vessel reconstruction on non-enhanced CT images using deep learning models.

Materials and methods: 177 patients' CT scans in the non-enhanced phase, arterial phase and venous phase were chosen. These data were randomly divided into the training set (n = 120), validation set (n = 20) and test set (n = 37). In training set and validation set, a radiologist marked out the right renal arteries and veins on non-enhanced CT phase images using contrast phases as references. Trained deep learning models were tested and evaluated on the test set. A radiologist performed renal vessel reconstruction on the test set without the contrast phase reference, and the results were used for comparison. Reconstruction using the arterial phase and venous phase was used as the gold standard.

Results: Without the contrast phase reference, both radiologist and model could accurately identify artery and vein main trunk. The accuracy was 91.9% vs. 97.3% (model vs. radiologist) in artery and 91.9% vs. 100% in vein, the difference was insignificant. The model had difficulty identify accessory arteries, the accuracy was significantly lower than radiologist (44.4% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.044). The model also had lower accuracy in accessory veins, but the difference was insignificant (64.3% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.094).

Conclusion: Deep learning models could accurately recognize the right renal artery and vein main trunk, and accuracy was comparable to that of radiologists. Although the current model still had difficulty recognizing small accessory vessels, further training and model optimization would solve these problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信