生态系统评估,通过地球化学和宏基因组学研究,支持密西西比州主要土地资源地区土壤可持续性的创新进展。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gbemisola Oyindamola Akinbi, Qi Lin, Tolulope Elizabeth Fiola, Rajesh Singh Rathore, Veera Lakshmi Devi Badisa, Benjamin Mwashote, Gang Chen, Victor Ibeanusi
{"title":"生态系统评估,通过地球化学和宏基因组学研究,支持密西西比州主要土地资源地区土壤可持续性的创新进展。","authors":"Gbemisola Oyindamola Akinbi, Qi Lin, Tolulope Elizabeth Fiola, Rajesh Singh Rathore, Veera Lakshmi Devi Badisa, Benjamin Mwashote, Gang Chen, Victor Ibeanusi","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36490-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present study, the ecosystem of Roebuck (RF) and Nesbit blueberry plantation (NBP) farms in Mississippi state, USA that differed by type of fertilizer treatment was assessed using soil samples through geophysical-chemical parameters and metagenomics studies. Soil geophysical-chemical parameters such as pH, moisture, organic content, nutrients, and toxic metal concentrations were measured. Metagenomic analysis was performed to identify the bacterial communities in the soil samples. The results revealed that the pH of the NBP farm (organic fertilizer) was lower than that of the RF farm (chemical fertilizer). The NBP soil samples exhibited higher moisture and organic contents than the RF soil samples. The tested heavy metal concentrations in both farm soil samples were within the limits recommended by the EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Different concentrations of nutrients were observed between these two farms soil samples. RF soil indicated greater species richness and a more balanced distribution of species abundances. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota were the most abundant phyla observed in RF soil, whereas Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, and Actinobacteriota were the most abundant phyla observed in NBP soil. This study clearly demonstrated the effects of fertilizer type on the soil through variations in geophysical-chemical parameters, which subsequently changed the microbial communities. This study suggests that organic fertilizer application could be an effective method for sustainable soil quality as the organic fertilized soils exhibited higher moisture and organic content that promotes plant growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem assessment to support innovative advancements in soil sustainability in the major land resource areas of Mississippi through geochemical and metagenomics studies.\",\"authors\":\"Gbemisola Oyindamola Akinbi, Qi Lin, Tolulope Elizabeth Fiola, Rajesh Singh Rathore, Veera Lakshmi Devi Badisa, Benjamin Mwashote, Gang Chen, Victor Ibeanusi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-025-36490-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the present study, the ecosystem of Roebuck (RF) and Nesbit blueberry plantation (NBP) farms in Mississippi state, USA that differed by type of fertilizer treatment was assessed using soil samples through geophysical-chemical parameters and metagenomics studies. Soil geophysical-chemical parameters such as pH, moisture, organic content, nutrients, and toxic metal concentrations were measured. Metagenomic analysis was performed to identify the bacterial communities in the soil samples. The results revealed that the pH of the NBP farm (organic fertilizer) was lower than that of the RF farm (chemical fertilizer). The NBP soil samples exhibited higher moisture and organic contents than the RF soil samples. The tested heavy metal concentrations in both farm soil samples were within the limits recommended by the EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Different concentrations of nutrients were observed between these two farms soil samples. RF soil indicated greater species richness and a more balanced distribution of species abundances. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota were the most abundant phyla observed in RF soil, whereas Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, and Actinobacteriota were the most abundant phyla observed in NBP soil. This study clearly demonstrated the effects of fertilizer type on the soil through variations in geophysical-chemical parameters, which subsequently changed the microbial communities. This study suggests that organic fertilizer application could be an effective method for sustainable soil quality as the organic fertilized soils exhibited higher moisture and organic content that promotes plant growth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36490-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36490-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以美国密西西比州Roebuck (RF)和Nesbit蓝莓种植园(NBP)为研究对象,利用土壤样品,通过地球物理化学参数和宏基因组学研究对不同施肥方式的蓝莓生态系统进行了评价。测量了土壤的物理化学参数,如pH值、水分、有机含量、养分和有毒金属浓度。通过宏基因组分析鉴定土壤样品中的细菌群落。结果表明,NBP(有机肥)农田的pH值低于RF(化肥)农田。NBP土壤样品的水分和有机含量高于RF土壤样品。两个农场土壤样本的重金属浓度均在美国环境保护署建议的限度之内。在这两个农场的土壤样品中观察到不同浓度的养分。RF土壤物种丰富度更高,物种丰富度分布更平衡。RF土壤中最丰富的门是变形菌门、拟杆菌门和放线菌门,NBP土壤中最丰富的门是变形菌门、酸性菌门和放线菌门。本研究通过地球物理化学参数的变化清楚地证明了肥料类型对土壤的影响,从而改变了微生物群落。研究结果表明,施用有机肥可以提高土壤的水分和有机含量,促进植物生长,是维持土壤质量的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecosystem assessment to support innovative advancements in soil sustainability in the major land resource areas of Mississippi through geochemical and metagenomics studies.

In the present study, the ecosystem of Roebuck (RF) and Nesbit blueberry plantation (NBP) farms in Mississippi state, USA that differed by type of fertilizer treatment was assessed using soil samples through geophysical-chemical parameters and metagenomics studies. Soil geophysical-chemical parameters such as pH, moisture, organic content, nutrients, and toxic metal concentrations were measured. Metagenomic analysis was performed to identify the bacterial communities in the soil samples. The results revealed that the pH of the NBP farm (organic fertilizer) was lower than that of the RF farm (chemical fertilizer). The NBP soil samples exhibited higher moisture and organic contents than the RF soil samples. The tested heavy metal concentrations in both farm soil samples were within the limits recommended by the EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Different concentrations of nutrients were observed between these two farms soil samples. RF soil indicated greater species richness and a more balanced distribution of species abundances. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota were the most abundant phyla observed in RF soil, whereas Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, and Actinobacteriota were the most abundant phyla observed in NBP soil. This study clearly demonstrated the effects of fertilizer type on the soil through variations in geophysical-chemical parameters, which subsequently changed the microbial communities. This study suggests that organic fertilizer application could be an effective method for sustainable soil quality as the organic fertilized soils exhibited higher moisture and organic content that promotes plant growth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信