地下水质量监测中聚类和集成学习的结合:可持续水管理的数据驱动框架。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Harjot Kaur, Babankumar S Bansod, Parth Khungar, Chirag Dhawan
{"title":"地下水质量监测中聚类和集成学习的结合:可持续水管理的数据驱动框架。","authors":"Harjot Kaur, Babankumar S Bansod, Parth Khungar, Chirag Dhawan","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36477-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This groundwater quality assessment study for the state of Punjab, India, utilized six Water Quality Index (WQI) models, i.e., NSF-AM, NSF-GM, CCME, Horton, West Java, and GPI for potability assessment via machine learning (ML) classifiers. The results of the study manifested poor groundwater quality in many regions of the state that fall below potability standards (WHO and BIS). CCME WQI classified the state's groundwater as poor to marginal, rendering it unsuitable for human consumption. The disparities observed among WQI models highlighted differences in parameter selection, weight assignment, and aggregation techniques, emphasizing the need for a customized WQI framework for the Indian subcontinent for more accurate and robust groundwater quality assessment. K-means clustering, employed as a preprocessing step for improving classification accuracy, grouped data into two distinct clusters (validated by silhouette scores = 0.927 and Calinski-Harabasz index = 129.21), revealing contamination sources' patterns, feature refinement, and enhancement. Further, application and performance analysis of ML classifiers integrated with K-means clustering analysis identified Ensemble Hard Voting (EHV) and Ensemble Soft Voting (ESV) as top performers for groundwater quality classification. The GPI WQI combined with ESV achieved Accuracy = 99.13%, Precision = 100%, Recall = 99.03%, F1-score = 99.51%, Specificity = 100%, MCC = 0.95, Log Loss = 0.11, and AUC = 100% while maintaining moderate model and computational complexity (t<sub>predict</sub> = 0.0095 s), underscores the efficiency and suitability of GPI and ESV blend for real-time water quality monitoring systems. The presented data-driven holistic framework highlights the capability of ML-driven groundwater assessment as a decision-support tool for resource-constrained regions, facilitating policy interventions and promoting sustainable water management practices by leveraging its accurate classification and real-time assessment capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining clustering and ensemble learning for groundwater quality monitoring: a data-driven framework for sustainable water management.\",\"authors\":\"Harjot Kaur, Babankumar S Bansod, Parth Khungar, Chirag Dhawan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-025-36477-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This groundwater quality assessment study for the state of Punjab, India, utilized six Water Quality Index (WQI) models, i.e., NSF-AM, NSF-GM, CCME, Horton, West Java, and GPI for potability assessment via machine learning (ML) classifiers. The results of the study manifested poor groundwater quality in many regions of the state that fall below potability standards (WHO and BIS). CCME WQI classified the state's groundwater as poor to marginal, rendering it unsuitable for human consumption. The disparities observed among WQI models highlighted differences in parameter selection, weight assignment, and aggregation techniques, emphasizing the need for a customized WQI framework for the Indian subcontinent for more accurate and robust groundwater quality assessment. K-means clustering, employed as a preprocessing step for improving classification accuracy, grouped data into two distinct clusters (validated by silhouette scores = 0.927 and Calinski-Harabasz index = 129.21), revealing contamination sources' patterns, feature refinement, and enhancement. Further, application and performance analysis of ML classifiers integrated with K-means clustering analysis identified Ensemble Hard Voting (EHV) and Ensemble Soft Voting (ESV) as top performers for groundwater quality classification. The GPI WQI combined with ESV achieved Accuracy = 99.13%, Precision = 100%, Recall = 99.03%, F1-score = 99.51%, Specificity = 100%, MCC = 0.95, Log Loss = 0.11, and AUC = 100% while maintaining moderate model and computational complexity (t<sub>predict</sub> = 0.0095 s), underscores the efficiency and suitability of GPI and ESV blend for real-time water quality monitoring systems. The presented data-driven holistic framework highlights the capability of ML-driven groundwater assessment as a decision-support tool for resource-constrained regions, facilitating policy interventions and promoting sustainable water management practices by leveraging its accurate classification and real-time assessment capabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36477-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36477-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项针对印度旁遮普邦的地下水质量评估研究,利用6个水质指数(WQI)模型,即NSF-AM、NSF-GM、CCME、Horton、西爪哇和GPI,通过机器学习(ML)分类器进行可饮用性评估。研究结果表明,该州许多地区的地下水质量较差,低于饮用标准(世卫组织和BIS)。CCME WQI将该州的地下水划分为差至边缘,不适合人类消费。WQI模型之间的差异突出了参数选择、权重分配和聚合技术的差异,强调需要为印度次大陆定制WQI框架,以实现更准确、更可靠的地下水质量评估。K-means聚类作为提高分类精度的预处理步骤,将数据分为两个不同的聚类(轮廓分数= 0.927,Calinski-Harabasz指数= 129.21),揭示污染源的模式,特征的改进和增强。此外,结合K-means聚类分析的ML分类器的应用和性能分析表明,集成硬投票(EHV)和集成软投票(ESV)是地下水质量分类的最佳选择。GPI WQI联合ESV在保持中等模型和计算复杂度(tpredict = 0.0095 s)的情况下,准确率为99.13%,精密度为100%,召回率为99.03%,F1-score为99.51%,特异性为100%,MCC为0.95,Log Loss为0.11,AUC为100%,强调了GPI和ESV混合用于实时水质监测系统的效率和适用性。提出的数据驱动的整体框架强调了机器学习驱动的地下水评估作为资源受限地区的决策支持工具的能力,通过利用其准确的分类和实时评估能力,促进政策干预和促进可持续的水资源管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining clustering and ensemble learning for groundwater quality monitoring: a data-driven framework for sustainable water management.

This groundwater quality assessment study for the state of Punjab, India, utilized six Water Quality Index (WQI) models, i.e., NSF-AM, NSF-GM, CCME, Horton, West Java, and GPI for potability assessment via machine learning (ML) classifiers. The results of the study manifested poor groundwater quality in many regions of the state that fall below potability standards (WHO and BIS). CCME WQI classified the state's groundwater as poor to marginal, rendering it unsuitable for human consumption. The disparities observed among WQI models highlighted differences in parameter selection, weight assignment, and aggregation techniques, emphasizing the need for a customized WQI framework for the Indian subcontinent for more accurate and robust groundwater quality assessment. K-means clustering, employed as a preprocessing step for improving classification accuracy, grouped data into two distinct clusters (validated by silhouette scores = 0.927 and Calinski-Harabasz index = 129.21), revealing contamination sources' patterns, feature refinement, and enhancement. Further, application and performance analysis of ML classifiers integrated with K-means clustering analysis identified Ensemble Hard Voting (EHV) and Ensemble Soft Voting (ESV) as top performers for groundwater quality classification. The GPI WQI combined with ESV achieved Accuracy = 99.13%, Precision = 100%, Recall = 99.03%, F1-score = 99.51%, Specificity = 100%, MCC = 0.95, Log Loss = 0.11, and AUC = 100% while maintaining moderate model and computational complexity (tpredict = 0.0095 s), underscores the efficiency and suitability of GPI and ESV blend for real-time water quality monitoring systems. The presented data-driven holistic framework highlights the capability of ML-driven groundwater assessment as a decision-support tool for resource-constrained regions, facilitating policy interventions and promoting sustainable water management practices by leveraging its accurate classification and real-time assessment capabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信