Gabrielle Wasser-Bennett, A Ross Brown, Samuel K Maynard, Stewart F Owen, Charles R Tyler
{"title":"关键洞察抗精神病药物对鱼类的潜在风险,包括通过对行为的影响。","authors":"Gabrielle Wasser-Bennett, A Ross Brown, Samuel K Maynard, Stewart F Owen, Charles R Tyler","doi":"10.1111/brv.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are a diverse class of neuroactive pharmaceuticals increasingly detected in surface and ground waters globally. Some APDs are classified as posing a high environmental risk, due, in part, to their tendency to bioaccumulate in wildlife, including fish. Additional risk drivers for APDs relate to their behavioural effects, potentially impacting fitness outcomes. However, standard ecotoxicological tests used in environmental risk assessment (ERA) do not currently account for these mechanisms. In this review, we critically appraise the environmental risks of APDs to fish. We begin by reading-across from human and mammalian effects data to standard ecotoxicological effects endpoints in fish. We then explore the wide range of behaviours suitable for ecotoxicological assessment of APDs (and other neuroactive) pharmaceuticals, principally through laboratory studies with zebrafish, and assess the potential for using these behavioural phenotypes to predict adverse individual- and population-level outcomes in wild fish, taking into account phenotypic plasticity. Next, we illustrate the advantages and challenges of measuring and applying behavioural endpoints for fish, including within current regulatory risk assessments. In our final analysis, the implications of relying on apical endpoints for ERA of neuroactive drugs (including APDs) are assessed and recommendations provided for the development of a more refined and tailored mechanistic approach, which would enable more robust assessment of their environmental risk(s).</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical insights into the potential risks of antipsychotic drugs to fish, including through effects on behaviour.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Wasser-Bennett, A Ross Brown, Samuel K Maynard, Stewart F Owen, Charles R Tyler\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are a diverse class of neuroactive pharmaceuticals increasingly detected in surface and ground waters globally. Some APDs are classified as posing a high environmental risk, due, in part, to their tendency to bioaccumulate in wildlife, including fish. Additional risk drivers for APDs relate to their behavioural effects, potentially impacting fitness outcomes. However, standard ecotoxicological tests used in environmental risk assessment (ERA) do not currently account for these mechanisms. In this review, we critically appraise the environmental risks of APDs to fish. We begin by reading-across from human and mammalian effects data to standard ecotoxicological effects endpoints in fish. We then explore the wide range of behaviours suitable for ecotoxicological assessment of APDs (and other neuroactive) pharmaceuticals, principally through laboratory studies with zebrafish, and assess the potential for using these behavioural phenotypes to predict adverse individual- and population-level outcomes in wild fish, taking into account phenotypic plasticity. Next, we illustrate the advantages and challenges of measuring and applying behavioural endpoints for fish, including within current regulatory risk assessments. In our final analysis, the implications of relying on apical endpoints for ERA of neuroactive drugs (including APDs) are assessed and recommendations provided for the development of a more refined and tailored mechanistic approach, which would enable more robust assessment of their environmental risk(s).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70031\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical insights into the potential risks of antipsychotic drugs to fish, including through effects on behaviour.
Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are a diverse class of neuroactive pharmaceuticals increasingly detected in surface and ground waters globally. Some APDs are classified as posing a high environmental risk, due, in part, to their tendency to bioaccumulate in wildlife, including fish. Additional risk drivers for APDs relate to their behavioural effects, potentially impacting fitness outcomes. However, standard ecotoxicological tests used in environmental risk assessment (ERA) do not currently account for these mechanisms. In this review, we critically appraise the environmental risks of APDs to fish. We begin by reading-across from human and mammalian effects data to standard ecotoxicological effects endpoints in fish. We then explore the wide range of behaviours suitable for ecotoxicological assessment of APDs (and other neuroactive) pharmaceuticals, principally through laboratory studies with zebrafish, and assess the potential for using these behavioural phenotypes to predict adverse individual- and population-level outcomes in wild fish, taking into account phenotypic plasticity. Next, we illustrate the advantages and challenges of measuring and applying behavioural endpoints for fish, including within current regulatory risk assessments. In our final analysis, the implications of relying on apical endpoints for ERA of neuroactive drugs (including APDs) are assessed and recommendations provided for the development of a more refined and tailored mechanistic approach, which would enable more robust assessment of their environmental risk(s).
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.