新加坡疑似疫苗过敏患者的评估。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Zi Teng Chai, Jia Yi Goh, Karen Jui Lin Choo, Kheng Yong Ong, Vivian Tan, Chiara Jiamin Chong, Chaw Su Naing, Haur Yueh Lee
{"title":"新加坡疑似疫苗过敏患者的评估。","authors":"Zi Teng Chai, Jia Yi Goh, Karen Jui Lin Choo, Kheng Yong Ong, Vivian Tan, Chiara Jiamin Chong, Chaw Su Naing, Haur Yueh Lee","doi":"10.12932/AP-140724-1891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypersensitivity reaction to vaccines has been reported to occur in 5 per 100,000 doses. Although hypersensitivity reactions can occur to either the active vaccine component or other components such as excipients, outcome data from skin testing and provocation remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the role of skin testing and vaccine provocation in patients with an allergy label to vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single centre, prospective study between March 2021 and November 2021 of adults with known allergy to non-COVID vaccine. All participants underwent skin prick testing (SPT) and intradermal testing (IDT) to vaccine and excipients. A subset of patients with negative skin testing underwent graded vaccine provocation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 264 adults were evaluated. The most common index vaccine reactions were nonspecific rash (47.7%), angioedema (32.2%) and itch (25.0%). All patients had negative SPT to vaccines and excipients. Thirty patients (11.4%) had positive IDT to Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), Influenza, Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR), Pneumococcal, Rabies, Diphteria, Tetanus and Pertussis (DTaP). Out of 234 patients with negative IDT, 32 patients (12.1%) underwent vaccine provocation. Three patients (9.4%) developed reaction to influenza and MMR vaccine. One patient required systemic corticosteroids, one required antihistamine, and another patient did not require any treatment. None required admission or attendance at emergency department.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of allergy labels to vaccine are inaccurate based on low skin test positivity and low reaction rates on vaccine provocation. Vaccine provocation is safe. Excipients are unlikely to be the main cause of hypersensitivity reactions in vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":8552,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of patients with suspected vaccine allergies in Singapore.\",\"authors\":\"Zi Teng Chai, Jia Yi Goh, Karen Jui Lin Choo, Kheng Yong Ong, Vivian Tan, Chiara Jiamin Chong, Chaw Su Naing, Haur Yueh Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.12932/AP-140724-1891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypersensitivity reaction to vaccines has been reported to occur in 5 per 100,000 doses. Although hypersensitivity reactions can occur to either the active vaccine component or other components such as excipients, outcome data from skin testing and provocation remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the role of skin testing and vaccine provocation in patients with an allergy label to vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single centre, prospective study between March 2021 and November 2021 of adults with known allergy to non-COVID vaccine. All participants underwent skin prick testing (SPT) and intradermal testing (IDT) to vaccine and excipients. A subset of patients with negative skin testing underwent graded vaccine provocation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 264 adults were evaluated. The most common index vaccine reactions were nonspecific rash (47.7%), angioedema (32.2%) and itch (25.0%). All patients had negative SPT to vaccines and excipients. Thirty patients (11.4%) had positive IDT to Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), Influenza, Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR), Pneumococcal, Rabies, Diphteria, Tetanus and Pertussis (DTaP). Out of 234 patients with negative IDT, 32 patients (12.1%) underwent vaccine provocation. Three patients (9.4%) developed reaction to influenza and MMR vaccine. One patient required systemic corticosteroids, one required antihistamine, and another patient did not require any treatment. None required admission or attendance at emergency department.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of allergy labels to vaccine are inaccurate based on low skin test positivity and low reaction rates on vaccine provocation. Vaccine provocation is safe. Excipients are unlikely to be the main cause of hypersensitivity reactions in vaccines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-140724-1891\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-140724-1891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,每10万剂疫苗中有5例发生过敏反应。虽然活性疫苗成分或辅料等其他成分均可发生超敏反应,但皮肤试验和激发的结果数据仍然有限。目的:评价皮肤试验和疫苗激发在有疫苗过敏标签患者中的作用。方法:这是一项单中心前瞻性研究,于2021年3月至2021年11月期间对已知对非covid疫苗过敏的成年人进行研究。所有参与者都接受了疫苗和辅料的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)和皮内试验(IDT)。一部分皮肤试验阴性的患者接受了分级疫苗激发。结果:共对264名成人进行了评估。最常见的指数疫苗反应为非特异性皮疹(47.7%)、血管性水肿(32.2%)和瘙痒(25.0%)。所有患者对疫苗和辅料的SPT均为阴性。甲型肝炎、乙型肝炎、人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)、流感、麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹(MMR)、肺炎球菌、狂犬病、白喉、破伤风和百日咳(DTaP)的IDT阳性30例(11.4%)。在234例IDT阴性患者中,32例(12.1%)接受了疫苗激发。3例(9.4%)出现流感和MMR疫苗反应。一名患者需要全身皮质类固醇,一名患者需要抗组胺药,另一名患者不需要任何治疗。没有人需要入院或到急诊室就诊。结论:基于低皮肤试验阳性和低疫苗激发反应率,大多数疫苗过敏标签不准确。疫苗刺激是安全的。赋形剂不太可能是疫苗过敏反应的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of patients with suspected vaccine allergies in Singapore.

Background: Hypersensitivity reaction to vaccines has been reported to occur in 5 per 100,000 doses. Although hypersensitivity reactions can occur to either the active vaccine component or other components such as excipients, outcome data from skin testing and provocation remains limited.

Objective: To evaluate the role of skin testing and vaccine provocation in patients with an allergy label to vaccine.

Methods: This is a single centre, prospective study between March 2021 and November 2021 of adults with known allergy to non-COVID vaccine. All participants underwent skin prick testing (SPT) and intradermal testing (IDT) to vaccine and excipients. A subset of patients with negative skin testing underwent graded vaccine provocation.

Results: A total of 264 adults were evaluated. The most common index vaccine reactions were nonspecific rash (47.7%), angioedema (32.2%) and itch (25.0%). All patients had negative SPT to vaccines and excipients. Thirty patients (11.4%) had positive IDT to Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), Influenza, Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR), Pneumococcal, Rabies, Diphteria, Tetanus and Pertussis (DTaP). Out of 234 patients with negative IDT, 32 patients (12.1%) underwent vaccine provocation. Three patients (9.4%) developed reaction to influenza and MMR vaccine. One patient required systemic corticosteroids, one required antihistamine, and another patient did not require any treatment. None required admission or attendance at emergency department.

Conclusions: The majority of allergy labels to vaccine are inaccurate based on low skin test positivity and low reaction rates on vaccine provocation. Vaccine provocation is safe. Excipients are unlikely to be the main cause of hypersensitivity reactions in vaccines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology (APJAI) is an online open access journal with the recent impact factor (2018) 1.747 APJAI published 4 times per annum (March, June, September, December). Four issues constitute one volume. APJAI publishes original research articles of basic science, clinical science and reviews on various aspects of allergy and immunology. This journal is an official journal of and published by the Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Association, Thailand. The scopes include mechanism, pathogenesis, host-pathogen interaction, host-environment interaction, allergic diseases, immune-mediated diseases, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, immunotherapy, and vaccine. All papers are published in English and are refereed to international standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信