使用随机森林模型从临床、多组学和实验室数据中早期预测子痫前期。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Qiang Zhao, Jia Li, Zhuo Diao, Xiao Zhang, Suihua Feng, Guixue Hou, Wenqiu Xu, Zhiguang Zhao, Zhixu Qiu, Wenzhi Yang, Si Zhou, Peirun Tian, Qun Zhang, Weiping Chen, Huahua Li, Gefei Xiao, Jie Qin, Liqing Hu, Zhongzhe Li, Liang Lin, Shunyao Wang, Ruyun Gao, Wuyan Huang, Xiaohong Ruan, Sufen Zhang, Jianguo Zhang, Lijian Zhao, Rui Zhang
{"title":"使用随机森林模型从临床、多组学和实验室数据中早期预测子痫前期。","authors":"Qiang Zhao, Jia Li, Zhuo Diao, Xiao Zhang, Suihua Feng, Guixue Hou, Wenqiu Xu, Zhiguang Zhao, Zhixu Qiu, Wenzhi Yang, Si Zhou, Peirun Tian, Qun Zhang, Weiping Chen, Huahua Li, Gefei Xiao, Jie Qin, Liqing Hu, Zhongzhe Li, Liang Lin, Shunyao Wang, Ruyun Gao, Wuyan Huang, Xiaohong Ruan, Sufen Zhang, Jianguo Zhang, Lijian Zhao, Rui Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07582-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting preeclampsia (PE) within the first 16 weeks of gestation is difficult due to various risk factors, poorly understood causes and likely multiple pathogenic phenotypes of preeclampsia.  OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to develop prediction models for early-onset preeclampsia (EPE) and late-onset preeclampsia (LPE) respectively using clinical data, metabolome and proteome analyses on plasma samples and laboratory data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively recruited 56 EPE, 50 LPE patients and 92 normotensive controls from three tertiary hospitals and used clinical and laboratory data in early pregnancy. Models for EPE and LPE were fitted with the use of patient' clinical, multi-omics and laboratory data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By comparing multi-omics and laboratory test variables between EPE, LPE and healthy controls, we identified sets of differentially expressed biomarkers, including 49 and 33 metabolites, 28 and 36 proteins as well as 5 and 7 laboratory variables associated with EPE and LPE respectively. Using the random forest algorithm, we developed a prediction model using seven clinical factors, seven metabolites, five laboratory test variables. The model yielded the highest accuracy for EPE prediction with good sensitivity (87.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.64%-97.34%) and specificity (94.1%, 95% CI: 80.32%-99.28%). We also developed a prediction model that exhibited high accuracy in separating LPE from controls (sensitivity: 66.67%, 95% CI: 43.03%-85.41%; specificity: 94.12%, 95% CI: 80.32%-99.28%) using seven clinical factors, five metabolites and eight proteins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study has identified a set of significant omics and laboratory features for PE prediction. The established models yielded high prediction performance for preeclampsia risk from clinical, multi-omics and laboratory information.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early prediction of preeclampsia from clinical, multi-omics and laboratory data using random forest model.\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Zhao, Jia Li, Zhuo Diao, Xiao Zhang, Suihua Feng, Guixue Hou, Wenqiu Xu, Zhiguang Zhao, Zhixu Qiu, Wenzhi Yang, Si Zhou, Peirun Tian, Qun Zhang, Weiping Chen, Huahua Li, Gefei Xiao, Jie Qin, Liqing Hu, Zhongzhe Li, Liang Lin, Shunyao Wang, Ruyun Gao, Wuyan Huang, Xiaohong Ruan, Sufen Zhang, Jianguo Zhang, Lijian Zhao, Rui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07582-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting preeclampsia (PE) within the first 16 weeks of gestation is difficult due to various risk factors, poorly understood causes and likely multiple pathogenic phenotypes of preeclampsia.  OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to develop prediction models for early-onset preeclampsia (EPE) and late-onset preeclampsia (LPE) respectively using clinical data, metabolome and proteome analyses on plasma samples and laboratory data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively recruited 56 EPE, 50 LPE patients and 92 normotensive controls from three tertiary hospitals and used clinical and laboratory data in early pregnancy. Models for EPE and LPE were fitted with the use of patient' clinical, multi-omics and laboratory data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By comparing multi-omics and laboratory test variables between EPE, LPE and healthy controls, we identified sets of differentially expressed biomarkers, including 49 and 33 metabolites, 28 and 36 proteins as well as 5 and 7 laboratory variables associated with EPE and LPE respectively. Using the random forest algorithm, we developed a prediction model using seven clinical factors, seven metabolites, five laboratory test variables. The model yielded the highest accuracy for EPE prediction with good sensitivity (87.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.64%-97.34%) and specificity (94.1%, 95% CI: 80.32%-99.28%). We also developed a prediction model that exhibited high accuracy in separating LPE from controls (sensitivity: 66.67%, 95% CI: 43.03%-85.41%; specificity: 94.12%, 95% CI: 80.32%-99.28%) using seven clinical factors, five metabolites and eight proteins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study has identified a set of significant omics and laboratory features for PE prediction. The established models yielded high prediction performance for preeclampsia risk from clinical, multi-omics and laboratory information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07582-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07582-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:妊娠前16周内预测子痫前期(PE)是困难的,由于各种危险因素,对子痫前期的原因知之甚少,并且可能存在多种致病表型。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在利用临床数据、血浆样本代谢组学和蛋白质组学分析以及实验室数据,分别建立早发型子痫前期(EPE)和晚发型子痫前期(LPE)的预测模型。方法:我们回顾性地从三所三级医院招募56例EPE患者、50例LPE患者和92例血压正常的对照组,并使用早期妊娠的临床和实验室资料。EPE和LPE模型使用患者临床、多组学和实验室数据进行拟合。结果:通过比较EPE、LPE和健康对照的多组学和实验室检测变量,我们分别鉴定出与EPE和LPE相关的生物标志物组,包括49种和33种代谢物,28种和36种蛋白质,以及5种和7种实验室变量。利用随机森林算法,我们建立了一个使用7个临床因素、7个代谢物、5个实验室测试变量的预测模型。该模型预测EPE的准确度最高,具有良好的敏感性(87.5%,95%可信区间[CI]: 67.64% ~ 97.34%)和特异性(94.1%,95% CI: 80.32% ~ 99.28%)。我们还建立了一个预测模型,在LPE与对照组的分离中表现出很高的准确性(灵敏度:66.67%,95% CI: 43.03%-85.41%;特异性:94.12%,95% CI: 80.32% ~ 99.28%),使用7个临床因素、5种代谢物和8种蛋白质。结论:我们的研究已经确定了PE预测的一组重要组学和实验室特征。建立的模型从临床、多组学和实验室信息对子痫前期风险具有较高的预测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early prediction of preeclampsia from clinical, multi-omics and laboratory data using random forest model.

Background: Predicting preeclampsia (PE) within the first 16 weeks of gestation is difficult due to various risk factors, poorly understood causes and likely multiple pathogenic phenotypes of preeclampsia.  OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to develop prediction models for early-onset preeclampsia (EPE) and late-onset preeclampsia (LPE) respectively using clinical data, metabolome and proteome analyses on plasma samples and laboratory data.

Methods: We retrospectively recruited 56 EPE, 50 LPE patients and 92 normotensive controls from three tertiary hospitals and used clinical and laboratory data in early pregnancy. Models for EPE and LPE were fitted with the use of patient' clinical, multi-omics and laboratory data.

Results: By comparing multi-omics and laboratory test variables between EPE, LPE and healthy controls, we identified sets of differentially expressed biomarkers, including 49 and 33 metabolites, 28 and 36 proteins as well as 5 and 7 laboratory variables associated with EPE and LPE respectively. Using the random forest algorithm, we developed a prediction model using seven clinical factors, seven metabolites, five laboratory test variables. The model yielded the highest accuracy for EPE prediction with good sensitivity (87.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.64%-97.34%) and specificity (94.1%, 95% CI: 80.32%-99.28%). We also developed a prediction model that exhibited high accuracy in separating LPE from controls (sensitivity: 66.67%, 95% CI: 43.03%-85.41%; specificity: 94.12%, 95% CI: 80.32%-99.28%) using seven clinical factors, five metabolites and eight proteins.

Conclusion: Our study has identified a set of significant omics and laboratory features for PE prediction. The established models yielded high prediction performance for preeclampsia risk from clinical, multi-omics and laboratory information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信