帕金森病患者交流行为与OFF期特征的关系

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2495171
Radhika Devraj, Connie Marras, Marlon R Tracey
{"title":"帕金森病患者交流行为与OFF期特征的关系","authors":"Radhika Devraj, Connie Marras, Marlon R Tracey","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2495171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Underreporting of OFF symptoms and poor patient-provider communication are known challenges in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to determine: (a) OFF period patient communication behavior components and (b) whether OFF period characteristics (frequency, duration, severity) were associated with communication behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the Fox Insight database was conducted. OFF periods were characterized by frequency (number of episodes/day), duration (duration/episode), and severity (impact on activities). The \"Impact and Communication about OFF periods\" questionnaire data were subjected to principal components analysis. Generalized linear model regressions with log link function were used to identify associations with OFF period characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 526 respondents showed that 89% were non-Hispanic whites, mean age = 65 ± 8.9 years, with PD duration = 6 ± 4.8 years. The majority (67%) had a frequency of 1-2 OFF periods/day, with the highest percent (31.4%) having 15-30 min OFF periods duration, and majority (63%) having none-to-some OFF periods severity. Two component communication behaviors were identified: (1) reluctance communicating (7 items, Cronbach's alpha (CA) = 0.851) and difficulty communicating (4 items, CA = 0.857). Above-average OFF periods severity was associated with a 12% higher reluctance score (beta = 0.117, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.03-0.21, <i>p</i> = 0.024). Higher OFF periods frequency and above-average severity were associated with greater difficulty communicating (Frequency: beta = 0.125, 95% CI = 0.03-0.22, <i>p</i> = 0.024; Severity: (beta = 0.186, 95% CI = 0.08-0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.003)) about OFF periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient communication about OFF periods involves two main factors: their difficulty and reluctance to communicate. Greater frequency and severity of OFF periods were associated with greater difficulty and reluctance to communicate. Understanding these relationships can guide providers to take preemptive efforts to promote OFF periods communication, enhancing care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"647-656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of OFF period characteristics with patient communication behaviors in Parkinson's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Radhika Devraj, Connie Marras, Marlon R Tracey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2025.2495171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Underreporting of OFF symptoms and poor patient-provider communication are known challenges in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to determine: (a) OFF period patient communication behavior components and (b) whether OFF period characteristics (frequency, duration, severity) were associated with communication behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the Fox Insight database was conducted. OFF periods were characterized by frequency (number of episodes/day), duration (duration/episode), and severity (impact on activities). The \\\"Impact and Communication about OFF periods\\\" questionnaire data were subjected to principal components analysis. Generalized linear model regressions with log link function were used to identify associations with OFF period characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 526 respondents showed that 89% were non-Hispanic whites, mean age = 65 ± 8.9 years, with PD duration = 6 ± 4.8 years. The majority (67%) had a frequency of 1-2 OFF periods/day, with the highest percent (31.4%) having 15-30 min OFF periods duration, and majority (63%) having none-to-some OFF periods severity. Two component communication behaviors were identified: (1) reluctance communicating (7 items, Cronbach's alpha (CA) = 0.851) and difficulty communicating (4 items, CA = 0.857). Above-average OFF periods severity was associated with a 12% higher reluctance score (beta = 0.117, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.03-0.21, <i>p</i> = 0.024). Higher OFF periods frequency and above-average severity were associated with greater difficulty communicating (Frequency: beta = 0.125, 95% CI = 0.03-0.22, <i>p</i> = 0.024; Severity: (beta = 0.186, 95% CI = 0.08-0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.003)) about OFF periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient communication about OFF periods involves two main factors: their difficulty and reluctance to communicate. Greater frequency and severity of OFF periods were associated with greater difficulty and reluctance to communicate. Understanding these relationships can guide providers to take preemptive efforts to promote OFF periods communication, enhancing care quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"647-656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2495171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2495171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:少报OFF症状和不良的医患沟通是帕金森病(PD)面临的已知挑战。我们的目的是确定:(a) OFF期患者沟通行为成分;(b) OFF期特征(频率、持续时间、严重程度)是否与沟通行为相关。方法:采用Fox Insight数据库进行回顾性队列研究。OFF期以频率(每天发作次数)、持续时间(持续时间/发作次数)和严重程度(对活动的影响)为特征。对“OFF期的影响与沟通”问卷数据进行主成分分析。使用对数链接函数的广义线性模型回归来识别与OFF周期特征的关联。结果:526例被调查者的资料显示89%为非西班牙裔白人,平均年龄= 65±8.9岁,PD病程= 6±4.8年。大多数人(67%)每天有1-2次关机的频率,最高的百分比(31.4%)有15-30分钟的关机时间,大多数人(63%)没有到一些严重的关机时间。沟通行为分为两个组成部分:(1)沟通不情愿(7项,Cronbach’s alpha (CA) = 0.851)和沟通困难(4项,CA = 0.857)。高于平均水平的OFF期严重程度与12%高的不情愿评分相关(beta = 0.117, 95%置信区间(CI) = 0.03-0.21, p = 0.024)。较高的OFF周期频率和高于平均水平的严重程度与更大的沟通困难相关(频率:beta值= 0.125,95% CI = 0.03-0.22, p = 0.024;严重程度:OFF期(beta = 0.186, 95% CI = 0.08-0.29, p = 0.003)。结论:OFF期患者沟通主要涉及两个因素:沟通困难和不愿沟通。OFF的频率和严重程度越高,沟通就越困难,越不愿意沟通。了解这些关系可以指导提供者采取先发制人的努力,促进OFF期沟通,提高护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of OFF period characteristics with patient communication behaviors in Parkinson's disease.

Objective: Underreporting of OFF symptoms and poor patient-provider communication are known challenges in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to determine: (a) OFF period patient communication behavior components and (b) whether OFF period characteristics (frequency, duration, severity) were associated with communication behaviors.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the Fox Insight database was conducted. OFF periods were characterized by frequency (number of episodes/day), duration (duration/episode), and severity (impact on activities). The "Impact and Communication about OFF periods" questionnaire data were subjected to principal components analysis. Generalized linear model regressions with log link function were used to identify associations with OFF period characteristics.

Results: Data from 526 respondents showed that 89% were non-Hispanic whites, mean age = 65 ± 8.9 years, with PD duration = 6 ± 4.8 years. The majority (67%) had a frequency of 1-2 OFF periods/day, with the highest percent (31.4%) having 15-30 min OFF periods duration, and majority (63%) having none-to-some OFF periods severity. Two component communication behaviors were identified: (1) reluctance communicating (7 items, Cronbach's alpha (CA) = 0.851) and difficulty communicating (4 items, CA = 0.857). Above-average OFF periods severity was associated with a 12% higher reluctance score (beta = 0.117, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.03-0.21, p = 0.024). Higher OFF periods frequency and above-average severity were associated with greater difficulty communicating (Frequency: beta = 0.125, 95% CI = 0.03-0.22, p = 0.024; Severity: (beta = 0.186, 95% CI = 0.08-0.29, p = 0.003)) about OFF periods.

Conclusion: Patient communication about OFF periods involves two main factors: their difficulty and reluctance to communicate. Greater frequency and severity of OFF periods were associated with greater difficulty and reluctance to communicate. Understanding these relationships can guide providers to take preemptive efforts to promote OFF periods communication, enhancing care quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信