与学校有关的压力与内在心理健康问题之间的联系有多紧密?规格曲线分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Björn Högberg
{"title":"与学校有关的压力与内在心理健康问题之间的联系有多紧密?规格曲线分析。","authors":"Björn Högberg","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06829-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent review of research on the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems found growing scholarly interest in the topic, but also raised questions concerning the quality and reliability of the existing knowledge base. The aim of this study was to investigate how robust the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems is to differences in model specifications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal survey data from between 2,991 and 4,845 Swedish adolescent students aged 13-16 years were used. A total of 57,322 different models were estimated, varying the choice of sample, measure of internalizing problems, functional form, statistical method, and combinations of included control variables. The results were summarized using specification curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most estimates of the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems were statistically significant at the 5% level. The choice of sample, outcome, functional form, and control variables had a limited influence on the size and significance of the estimates, but the estimates were markedly smaller and mostly non-significant in models investigating lagged effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that school-related stress is a robust predictor of internalizing problems as long as the association is assumed to be contemporaneous, while evidence for lagged effects was weaker. A key conclusion is that the choice of whether to estimate lagged or contemporaneous effects may be the most consequential in studies on school-related stress and internalizing problems or similar topics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"413"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How robust is the association between school-related stress and internalizing mental health problems? A specification curve analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Björn Högberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-025-06829-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent review of research on the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems found growing scholarly interest in the topic, but also raised questions concerning the quality and reliability of the existing knowledge base. The aim of this study was to investigate how robust the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems is to differences in model specifications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal survey data from between 2,991 and 4,845 Swedish adolescent students aged 13-16 years were used. A total of 57,322 different models were estimated, varying the choice of sample, measure of internalizing problems, functional form, statistical method, and combinations of included control variables. The results were summarized using specification curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most estimates of the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems were statistically significant at the 5% level. The choice of sample, outcome, functional form, and control variables had a limited influence on the size and significance of the estimates, but the estimates were markedly smaller and mostly non-significant in models investigating lagged effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that school-related stress is a robust predictor of internalizing problems as long as the association is assumed to be contemporaneous, while evidence for lagged effects was weaker. A key conclusion is that the choice of whether to estimate lagged or contemporaneous effects may be the most consequential in studies on school-related stress and internalizing problems or similar topics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016417/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06829-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06829-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近一项关于学校相关压力与内化问题之间关系的研究综述发现,学术界对这一主题的兴趣日益浓厚,但也提出了有关现有知识库质量和可靠性的问题。本研究的目的是探讨学校相关压力和内化问题与模型规格差异之间的关联有多强。方法:采用2991 - 4845名13-16岁瑞典青少年学生的纵向调查数据。总共估计了57,322种不同的模型,包括样本的选择,内化问题的测量,功能形式,统计方法和所包括的控制变量的组合。用规格曲线分析对结果进行了总结。结果:大多数学校相关压力和内化问题之间的关联估计在5%的水平上具有统计学意义。样本、结果、函数形式和控制变量的选择对估计的大小和显著性影响有限,但在调查滞后效应的模型中,估计明显更小,而且大多数不显著。结论:本研究表明,学校相关压力是内化问题的有力预测因素,只要这种关联被认为是同时发生的,而滞后效应的证据则较弱。一个关键的结论是,在学校相关压力和内化问题或类似主题的研究中,评估滞后效应或同期效应的选择可能是最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How robust is the association between school-related stress and internalizing mental health problems? A specification curve analysis.

Background: A recent review of research on the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems found growing scholarly interest in the topic, but also raised questions concerning the quality and reliability of the existing knowledge base. The aim of this study was to investigate how robust the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems is to differences in model specifications.

Methods: Longitudinal survey data from between 2,991 and 4,845 Swedish adolescent students aged 13-16 years were used. A total of 57,322 different models were estimated, varying the choice of sample, measure of internalizing problems, functional form, statistical method, and combinations of included control variables. The results were summarized using specification curve analysis.

Results: Most estimates of the association between school-related stress and internalizing problems were statistically significant at the 5% level. The choice of sample, outcome, functional form, and control variables had a limited influence on the size and significance of the estimates, but the estimates were markedly smaller and mostly non-significant in models investigating lagged effects.

Conclusions: This study showed that school-related stress is a robust predictor of internalizing problems as long as the association is assumed to be contemporaneous, while evidence for lagged effects was weaker. A key conclusion is that the choice of whether to estimate lagged or contemporaneous effects may be the most consequential in studies on school-related stress and internalizing problems or similar topics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信