Cecilia E Kaufman, Margaret C Morrissey-Basler, Monique Marcelino, Douglas J Casa
{"title":"高温环境下模拟职业性工作中身体降温策略对生理和工作表现的影响。","authors":"Cecilia E Kaufman, Margaret C Morrissey-Basler, Monique Marcelino, Douglas J Casa","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Body cooling is a low-cost heat strain mitigation strategy to effectively reduce heat strain and enhance work performance. However, data on the efficacy of body cooling strategies remains limited. We aimed to examine the effects of body cooling with cooling garments on physiological, perceptual, and performance outcomes during simulated work in the heat in men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen physically active participants (seven men and seven women; age: 26 ± 3 years, peak oxygen consumption [VO<sub>2</sub>peak]: 42.7 ± 7.9 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>) completed two randomized control trials in a hot, humid environment (40°C, 40% relative humidity). During the body cooling trial (COOL), participants wore cooling garments (hat, sleeves, neck gaiter), and large cooling towels during rest breaks. There was no cooling intervention in the control trial (CON). Rectal temperature (T<sub>REC</sub>), skin temperature (T<sub>SK</sub>), and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Performance outcomes included the number of boxes lifted during the trial (BOX) and the time to complete 25 repetitions (TT25) post-trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant interaction between trial and activity with COOL reporting overall lower T<sub>REC</sub> (CON: 38.40 ± 0.46°C; COOL: 38.08 ± 0.31°C; p < 0.001), T<sub>SK</sub> (CON: 37.20 ± 0.72°C; COOL: 35.52 ± 1.52°C; p < 0.001), and HR (CON: 145 ± 17 bpm; COOL: 133 ± 24 bpm; p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between the number of boxes lifted and trial during BOX 1 and 3 (BOX 1: p = 0.010; BOX 3: p = 0.001). Significant differences between mean TT25 (CON: 169 ± 34 s; COOL: 149 ± 32 s; p = 0.011) were reported between trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Body cooling garments reduced physiological responses while improving performance during simulated work in heat and should be considered an effective, low-cost strategy to protect laborers from heat strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Body Cooling Strategies on Physiological and Performance Outcomes During Simulated Occupational Work in the Heat.\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia E Kaufman, Margaret C Morrissey-Basler, Monique Marcelino, Douglas J Casa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajim.23734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Body cooling is a low-cost heat strain mitigation strategy to effectively reduce heat strain and enhance work performance. However, data on the efficacy of body cooling strategies remains limited. We aimed to examine the effects of body cooling with cooling garments on physiological, perceptual, and performance outcomes during simulated work in the heat in men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen physically active participants (seven men and seven women; age: 26 ± 3 years, peak oxygen consumption [VO<sub>2</sub>peak]: 42.7 ± 7.9 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>) completed two randomized control trials in a hot, humid environment (40°C, 40% relative humidity). During the body cooling trial (COOL), participants wore cooling garments (hat, sleeves, neck gaiter), and large cooling towels during rest breaks. There was no cooling intervention in the control trial (CON). Rectal temperature (T<sub>REC</sub>), skin temperature (T<sub>SK</sub>), and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Performance outcomes included the number of boxes lifted during the trial (BOX) and the time to complete 25 repetitions (TT25) post-trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant interaction between trial and activity with COOL reporting overall lower T<sub>REC</sub> (CON: 38.40 ± 0.46°C; COOL: 38.08 ± 0.31°C; p < 0.001), T<sub>SK</sub> (CON: 37.20 ± 0.72°C; COOL: 35.52 ± 1.52°C; p < 0.001), and HR (CON: 145 ± 17 bpm; COOL: 133 ± 24 bpm; p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between the number of boxes lifted and trial during BOX 1 and 3 (BOX 1: p = 0.010; BOX 3: p = 0.001). Significant differences between mean TT25 (CON: 169 ± 34 s; COOL: 149 ± 32 s; p = 0.011) were reported between trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Body cooling garments reduced physiological responses while improving performance during simulated work in heat and should be considered an effective, low-cost strategy to protect laborers from heat strain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23734\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:机体冷却是一种低成本的热应变缓解策略,可有效降低热应变,提高工作绩效。然而,关于身体冷却策略有效性的数据仍然有限。我们的目的是研究在模拟高温工作中,使用降温服对男性和女性的生理、知觉和表现结果的影响。方法:14名体育锻炼参与者(7男7女;年龄:26±3岁,峰值耗氧量[VO2peak]: 42.7±7.9 mL kg-1 min-1)在炎热潮湿的环境(40°C, 40%相对湿度)下完成两项随机对照试验。在身体冷却试验(COOL)中,参与者在休息时穿着冷却服装(帽子、袖子、绑带)和大冷却毛巾。在对照试验(CON)中没有冷却干预。连续测量直肠温度(TREC)、皮肤温度(TSK)和心率(HR)。性能指标包括试验期间举起的箱子数量(BOX)和试验后完成25次重复的时间(TT25)。结果:试验和活动之间存在显著的相互作用,COOL报告总体较低的TREC (CON: 38.40±0.46°C;冷却:38.08±0.31°c;p SK (CON: 37.20±0.72°C;冷却:35.52±1.52°c;结论:在高温模拟工作中,人体冷却衣减少了生理反应,同时提高了表现,应该被认为是一种有效的、低成本的策略,以保护劳动者免受热疲劳。
The Effects of Body Cooling Strategies on Physiological and Performance Outcomes During Simulated Occupational Work in the Heat.
Background: Body cooling is a low-cost heat strain mitigation strategy to effectively reduce heat strain and enhance work performance. However, data on the efficacy of body cooling strategies remains limited. We aimed to examine the effects of body cooling with cooling garments on physiological, perceptual, and performance outcomes during simulated work in the heat in men and women.
Methods: Fourteen physically active participants (seven men and seven women; age: 26 ± 3 years, peak oxygen consumption [VO2peak]: 42.7 ± 7.9 mL kg-1 min-1) completed two randomized control trials in a hot, humid environment (40°C, 40% relative humidity). During the body cooling trial (COOL), participants wore cooling garments (hat, sleeves, neck gaiter), and large cooling towels during rest breaks. There was no cooling intervention in the control trial (CON). Rectal temperature (TREC), skin temperature (TSK), and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Performance outcomes included the number of boxes lifted during the trial (BOX) and the time to complete 25 repetitions (TT25) post-trial.
Results: There was a significant interaction between trial and activity with COOL reporting overall lower TREC (CON: 38.40 ± 0.46°C; COOL: 38.08 ± 0.31°C; p < 0.001), TSK (CON: 37.20 ± 0.72°C; COOL: 35.52 ± 1.52°C; p < 0.001), and HR (CON: 145 ± 17 bpm; COOL: 133 ± 24 bpm; p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between the number of boxes lifted and trial during BOX 1 and 3 (BOX 1: p = 0.010; BOX 3: p = 0.001). Significant differences between mean TT25 (CON: 169 ± 34 s; COOL: 149 ± 32 s; p = 0.011) were reported between trials.
Conclusion: Body cooling garments reduced physiological responses while improving performance during simulated work in heat and should be considered an effective, low-cost strategy to protect laborers from heat strain.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.