危险药品表面擦拭取样:欧洲实验室间比较研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Roland B van den Berg, Ewelina Korczowska, Mónica S F Santos, Maria Francisca Portilha-Cunha, Ana R L Ribeiro, Lucie Bláhová, Luděk Bláha, Claudia Vom Eyser, Jochen Tuerk, Richard C J M van Rossen, Erik B Wilms, Mirjam Crul
{"title":"危险药品表面擦拭取样:欧洲实验室间比较研究。","authors":"Roland B van den Berg, Ewelina Korczowska, Mónica S F Santos, Maria Francisca Portilha-Cunha, Ana R L Ribeiro, Lucie Bláhová, Luděk Bláha, Claudia Vom Eyser, Jochen Tuerk, Richard C J M van Rossen, Erik B Wilms, Mirjam Crul","doi":"10.1002/dta.3902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Workplace monitoring of hazardous medicinal products (HMPs) using surface wipe sampling is becoming common practice in many European hospitals and pharmacies. However, no independent quality control is available to validate wiping procedures and analytical methods. This study aimed to conduct a Europe-wide interlaboratory comparison (ILC) program to independently and blindly assess laboratory performance and variability in HMP detection. Four European laboratories participated in the study. Six HMPs-cyclophosphamide, etoposide, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel-were prepared at four concentrations (5000, 2000, 200, and 20 ng/mL) and applied to a 400-cm<sup>2</sup> stainless-steel surface, then wiped by the coordinating body according to each laboratory's protocol. Wipe samples were distributed to individual laboratories, where blind analyses were conducted. Target criteria for accuracy and recovery were set at 70%-130% and 50%-130%, respectively. Of the 80 samples, 69 (86%) met accuracy targets, and 70 (88%) met recovery targets. Accuracy was often overestimated for the lowest concentrations of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel by Laboratory A. Laboratory D showed low accuracy for paclitaxel at three lower concentrations. Among the 10 samples that did not meet recovery targets, all were below 50% and involved etoposide and paclitaxel. This ILC program demonstrates a viable method for evaluating laboratory performance in HMP detection, offering an external validation mechanism for surface wipe sampling methods. A future goal is to establish a global ILC program with a designated coordinating body for managing it effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface Wipe Sampling of Hazardous Medicinal Products: A European Interlaboratory Comparison Study.\",\"authors\":\"Roland B van den Berg, Ewelina Korczowska, Mónica S F Santos, Maria Francisca Portilha-Cunha, Ana R L Ribeiro, Lucie Bláhová, Luděk Bláha, Claudia Vom Eyser, Jochen Tuerk, Richard C J M van Rossen, Erik B Wilms, Mirjam Crul\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dta.3902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Workplace monitoring of hazardous medicinal products (HMPs) using surface wipe sampling is becoming common practice in many European hospitals and pharmacies. However, no independent quality control is available to validate wiping procedures and analytical methods. This study aimed to conduct a Europe-wide interlaboratory comparison (ILC) program to independently and blindly assess laboratory performance and variability in HMP detection. Four European laboratories participated in the study. Six HMPs-cyclophosphamide, etoposide, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel-were prepared at four concentrations (5000, 2000, 200, and 20 ng/mL) and applied to a 400-cm<sup>2</sup> stainless-steel surface, then wiped by the coordinating body according to each laboratory's protocol. Wipe samples were distributed to individual laboratories, where blind analyses were conducted. Target criteria for accuracy and recovery were set at 70%-130% and 50%-130%, respectively. Of the 80 samples, 69 (86%) met accuracy targets, and 70 (88%) met recovery targets. Accuracy was often overestimated for the lowest concentrations of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel by Laboratory A. Laboratory D showed low accuracy for paclitaxel at three lower concentrations. Among the 10 samples that did not meet recovery targets, all were below 50% and involved etoposide and paclitaxel. This ILC program demonstrates a viable method for evaluating laboratory performance in HMP detection, offering an external validation mechanism for surface wipe sampling methods. A future goal is to establish a global ILC program with a designated coordinating body for managing it effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3902\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多欧洲医院和药房,使用表面擦拭取样对危险药品(hmp)进行工作场所监测已成为一种普遍做法。然而,没有独立的质量控制来验证擦拭程序和分析方法。本研究旨在开展一项欧洲范围内的实验室间比较(ILC)计划,以独立和盲目地评估实验室在HMP检测中的表现和可变性。四个欧洲实验室参与了这项研究。六种hmp -环磷酰胺、依托泊苷、吉西他滨、异环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和紫杉醇-以四种浓度(5000、2000、200和20 ng/mL)制备,并应用于400 cm2的不锈钢表面,然后由协调体根据每个实验室的方案擦拭。擦拭样本被分发到各个实验室,在那里进行盲法分析。准确度和回收率的目标标准分别设定为70% ~ 130%和50% ~ 130%。在80个样品中,69个(86%)达到了准确度目标,70个(88%)达到了回收率目标。实验室a对环磷酰胺、依泊苷、甲氨蝶呤和紫杉醇最低浓度的准确性常常高估。实验室D显示,在三种较低浓度下,紫杉醇的准确性较低。未达到回收率指标的10份样品均低于50%,且涉及依托泊苷和紫杉醇。该ILC程序演示了一种评估HMP检测实验室性能的可行方法,为表面擦拭取样方法提供了外部验证机制。未来的目标是建立一个全球性的ILC计划,并指定一个协调机构来有效地管理它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surface Wipe Sampling of Hazardous Medicinal Products: A European Interlaboratory Comparison Study.

Workplace monitoring of hazardous medicinal products (HMPs) using surface wipe sampling is becoming common practice in many European hospitals and pharmacies. However, no independent quality control is available to validate wiping procedures and analytical methods. This study aimed to conduct a Europe-wide interlaboratory comparison (ILC) program to independently and blindly assess laboratory performance and variability in HMP detection. Four European laboratories participated in the study. Six HMPs-cyclophosphamide, etoposide, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel-were prepared at four concentrations (5000, 2000, 200, and 20 ng/mL) and applied to a 400-cm2 stainless-steel surface, then wiped by the coordinating body according to each laboratory's protocol. Wipe samples were distributed to individual laboratories, where blind analyses were conducted. Target criteria for accuracy and recovery were set at 70%-130% and 50%-130%, respectively. Of the 80 samples, 69 (86%) met accuracy targets, and 70 (88%) met recovery targets. Accuracy was often overestimated for the lowest concentrations of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel by Laboratory A. Laboratory D showed low accuracy for paclitaxel at three lower concentrations. Among the 10 samples that did not meet recovery targets, all were below 50% and involved etoposide and paclitaxel. This ILC program demonstrates a viable method for evaluating laboratory performance in HMP detection, offering an external validation mechanism for surface wipe sampling methods. A future goal is to establish a global ILC program with a designated coordinating body for managing it effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信