老年慢性鼻窦炎患者的内窥镜鼻窦手术:手术结果的荟萃分析

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-06 DOI:10.1177/19458924251339100
Ahmad A Mirza, Maha A Alzahrani, Khalid M Alkhalifah, Sadeem J Almoajil, Reema S AlShugaig, Reem A Alghamdi, Jazmin A Alghamdi, Osama A Marglani
{"title":"老年慢性鼻窦炎患者的内窥镜鼻窦手术:手术结果的荟萃分析","authors":"Ahmad A Mirza, Maha A Alzahrani, Khalid M Alkhalifah, Sadeem J Almoajil, Reema S AlShugaig, Reem A Alghamdi, Jazmin A Alghamdi, Osama A Marglani","doi":"10.1177/19458924251339100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common condition that significantly impacts quality of life. While endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has proven effective in the general adult population, its specific effectiveness in older patients remains understudied.ObjectiveThis meta-analysis assessed the therapeutic effect and safety of ESS in patients aged 55 years and older with CRS.MethodsFive electronic databases were queried: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Therapeutic effectiveness of ESS was quantitatively assessed using random-effects meta-analysis, in which mean changes of pre- versus postoperative scores of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) were pooled. Meta-regression was conducted to predict the variability in SNOT-22 changes. Comparative meta-analyses evaluating surgical complications between older and younger adult patients were conducted.ResultsA total of 12 studies were synthesized. Both short- and long-term follow-up data demonstrated significant improvement by reference to baseline. Our analysis demonstrated statistically significant mean reduction in the SNOT-22 score by 21.4 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -26.9 to -15.9) at an average follow-up of approximately 9 months. This improvement exceeds the minimal clinically important difference for SNOT-22. The presence of nasal polyposis was a favorable prognostic indicator of SNOT-22 improvement (β = -0.21; <i>P</i> = .002). The rates of surgical adverse events among older patients were 4.2% for significant bleeding, 0.6% for orbital injury, and 0.2% for skull base injury. A significant difference between the two age groups was observed only in skull base injury (odds ratio = 2.98; 95% CI, 1.53-5.80; <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionESS offers clinically significant benefits for older individuals, particularly those with nasal polyposis. It is a safe treatment option for CRS in the older patients, with outcomes largely comparable to those in younger adults, though certain risks, such as skull base injury, may be slightly higher in older populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"379-391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Older Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad A Mirza, Maha A Alzahrani, Khalid M Alkhalifah, Sadeem J Almoajil, Reema S AlShugaig, Reem A Alghamdi, Jazmin A Alghamdi, Osama A Marglani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924251339100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common condition that significantly impacts quality of life. While endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has proven effective in the general adult population, its specific effectiveness in older patients remains understudied.ObjectiveThis meta-analysis assessed the therapeutic effect and safety of ESS in patients aged 55 years and older with CRS.MethodsFive electronic databases were queried: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Therapeutic effectiveness of ESS was quantitatively assessed using random-effects meta-analysis, in which mean changes of pre- versus postoperative scores of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) were pooled. Meta-regression was conducted to predict the variability in SNOT-22 changes. Comparative meta-analyses evaluating surgical complications between older and younger adult patients were conducted.ResultsA total of 12 studies were synthesized. Both short- and long-term follow-up data demonstrated significant improvement by reference to baseline. Our analysis demonstrated statistically significant mean reduction in the SNOT-22 score by 21.4 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -26.9 to -15.9) at an average follow-up of approximately 9 months. This improvement exceeds the minimal clinically important difference for SNOT-22. The presence of nasal polyposis was a favorable prognostic indicator of SNOT-22 improvement (β = -0.21; <i>P</i> = .002). The rates of surgical adverse events among older patients were 4.2% for significant bleeding, 0.6% for orbital injury, and 0.2% for skull base injury. A significant difference between the two age groups was observed only in skull base injury (odds ratio = 2.98; 95% CI, 1.53-5.80; <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionESS offers clinically significant benefits for older individuals, particularly those with nasal polyposis. It is a safe treatment option for CRS in the older patients, with outcomes largely comparable to those in younger adults, though certain risks, such as skull base injury, may be slightly higher in older populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"379-391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251339100\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251339100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是一种严重影响生活质量的常见疾病。虽然内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)已被证明对一般成年人有效,但其在老年患者中的具体有效性仍有待研究。目的本荟萃分析评估ESS治疗55岁及以上CRS患者的疗效和安全性。方法检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials等5个电子数据库。采用随机效应荟萃分析定量评估ESS的治疗效果,其中合并了术前与术后鼻预后测试-22 (SNOT-22)评分的平均变化。meta回归预测SNOT-22变化的可变性。进行了比较荟萃分析,评估老年和年轻成人患者的手术并发症。结果共合成12项研究。短期和长期随访数据均显示与基线相比有显著改善。我们的分析显示,在平均随访约9个月时,SNOT-22评分平均降低了21.4分(95%可信区间[CI], -26.9至-15.9),具有统计学意义。这种改善超过了SNOT-22的最小临床重要差异。鼻息肉的存在是SNOT-22改善的有利预后指标(β = -0.21;p = .002)。老年患者的手术不良事件发生率为:大出血4.2%,眼眶损伤0.6%,颅底损伤0.2%。两个年龄组之间仅在颅底损伤方面存在显著差异(优势比= 2.98;95% ci, 1.53-5.80;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Older Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.

BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common condition that significantly impacts quality of life. While endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has proven effective in the general adult population, its specific effectiveness in older patients remains understudied.ObjectiveThis meta-analysis assessed the therapeutic effect and safety of ESS in patients aged 55 years and older with CRS.MethodsFive electronic databases were queried: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Therapeutic effectiveness of ESS was quantitatively assessed using random-effects meta-analysis, in which mean changes of pre- versus postoperative scores of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) were pooled. Meta-regression was conducted to predict the variability in SNOT-22 changes. Comparative meta-analyses evaluating surgical complications between older and younger adult patients were conducted.ResultsA total of 12 studies were synthesized. Both short- and long-term follow-up data demonstrated significant improvement by reference to baseline. Our analysis demonstrated statistically significant mean reduction in the SNOT-22 score by 21.4 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -26.9 to -15.9) at an average follow-up of approximately 9 months. This improvement exceeds the minimal clinically important difference for SNOT-22. The presence of nasal polyposis was a favorable prognostic indicator of SNOT-22 improvement (β = -0.21; P = .002). The rates of surgical adverse events among older patients were 4.2% for significant bleeding, 0.6% for orbital injury, and 0.2% for skull base injury. A significant difference between the two age groups was observed only in skull base injury (odds ratio = 2.98; 95% CI, 1.53-5.80; P < .001).ConclusionESS offers clinically significant benefits for older individuals, particularly those with nasal polyposis. It is a safe treatment option for CRS in the older patients, with outcomes largely comparable to those in younger adults, though certain risks, such as skull base injury, may be slightly higher in older populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信