动脉瘤和正常主动脉升主动脉生物力学特性的区域差异。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Sachin Peterson, Daniella Eliathamby, Hayley Yap, Malak Elbatarny, Vrushali Guruji, Rifat Islam, Maral Ouzounian, Craig A Simmons, Jennifer Chung
{"title":"动脉瘤和正常主动脉升主动脉生物力学特性的区域差异。","authors":"Sachin Peterson, Daniella Eliathamby, Hayley Yap, Malak Elbatarny, Vrushali Guruji, Rifat Islam, Maral Ouzounian, Craig A Simmons, Jennifer Chung","doi":"10.1007/s10237-025-01941-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand regional biomechanical differences within the healthy and aneurysmal ascending aorta.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aortic tissue was collected from the inner (IC) and outer (OC) curvature of aneurysms excised during elective surgery (n = 102) and normal aortas from organ donors (n = 25). Biaxial tensile testing and peel testing were performed to derive a comprehensive set of biomechanical parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In normal aortas, the OC exhibited greater energy loss, lower tangent modulus at low strain, and lower transition zone stress compared to the IC. In aneurysmal aortas, similar findings were observed. All IC and OC biomechanical parameters were linearly correlated in aneurysmal aortas, including delamination strength. Healthy and aneurysmal aortas exhibited similar degrees of difference between IC and OC for most biomechanical properties. Aneurysms with greater biomechanical differences between IC and OC trended toward being older (p = 0.096) with larger diameters (p = 0.051) compared to other aneurysms. Asymmetric bulging exhibited lower stiffness and transition zone stress in the OC, but no difference in delamination strength between regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional biomechanical differences exist in aneurysms of the ascending aorta to a similar extent as in healthy aortas. In aneurysms, biomechanical properties of the IC and OC regions were strongly linearly correlated, suggesting that the regional differences in ascending aortic biomechanics are less important than the large biomechanical variability that exists between patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional differences in biomechanical properties of the ascending aorta in aneurysmal and normal aortas.\",\"authors\":\"Sachin Peterson, Daniella Eliathamby, Hayley Yap, Malak Elbatarny, Vrushali Guruji, Rifat Islam, Maral Ouzounian, Craig A Simmons, Jennifer Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10237-025-01941-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand regional biomechanical differences within the healthy and aneurysmal ascending aorta.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aortic tissue was collected from the inner (IC) and outer (OC) curvature of aneurysms excised during elective surgery (n = 102) and normal aortas from organ donors (n = 25). Biaxial tensile testing and peel testing were performed to derive a comprehensive set of biomechanical parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In normal aortas, the OC exhibited greater energy loss, lower tangent modulus at low strain, and lower transition zone stress compared to the IC. In aneurysmal aortas, similar findings were observed. All IC and OC biomechanical parameters were linearly correlated in aneurysmal aortas, including delamination strength. Healthy and aneurysmal aortas exhibited similar degrees of difference between IC and OC for most biomechanical properties. Aneurysms with greater biomechanical differences between IC and OC trended toward being older (p = 0.096) with larger diameters (p = 0.051) compared to other aneurysms. Asymmetric bulging exhibited lower stiffness and transition zone stress in the OC, but no difference in delamination strength between regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional biomechanical differences exist in aneurysms of the ascending aorta to a similar extent as in healthy aortas. In aneurysms, biomechanical properties of the IC and OC regions were strongly linearly correlated, suggesting that the regional differences in ascending aortic biomechanics are less important than the large biomechanical variability that exists between patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-025-01941-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-025-01941-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解健康和动脉瘤性升主动脉的区域生物力学差异。方法:选取择期手术切除的动脉瘤(n = 102)内、外弯曲的主动脉组织和器官供者的正常主动脉(n = 25)。进行双轴拉伸试验和剥离试验以获得一套全面的生物力学参数。结果:在正常主动脉中,与IC相比,OC表现出更大的能量损失,低应变下更低的切线模量,以及更低的过渡区应力。在动脉瘤主动脉中,观察到类似的结果。动脉瘤主动脉的所有IC和OC生物力学参数均呈线性相关,包括分层强度。健康主动脉和动脉瘤主动脉在大多数生物力学特性上表现出相似程度的差异。生物力学差异较大的动脉瘤比其他动脉瘤年龄大(p = 0.096),直径大(p = 0.051)。非对称胀形在OC中表现出较低的刚度和过渡区应力,但区域间分层强度没有差异。结论:升主动脉动脉瘤与健康主动脉存在相似程度的区域生物力学差异。在动脉瘤中,IC和OC区域的生物力学特性呈强线性相关,表明升主动脉生物力学的区域差异不如患者之间存在的巨大生物力学差异重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional differences in biomechanical properties of the ascending aorta in aneurysmal and normal aortas.

Objective: To understand regional biomechanical differences within the healthy and aneurysmal ascending aorta.

Methods: Aortic tissue was collected from the inner (IC) and outer (OC) curvature of aneurysms excised during elective surgery (n = 102) and normal aortas from organ donors (n = 25). Biaxial tensile testing and peel testing were performed to derive a comprehensive set of biomechanical parameters.

Results: In normal aortas, the OC exhibited greater energy loss, lower tangent modulus at low strain, and lower transition zone stress compared to the IC. In aneurysmal aortas, similar findings were observed. All IC and OC biomechanical parameters were linearly correlated in aneurysmal aortas, including delamination strength. Healthy and aneurysmal aortas exhibited similar degrees of difference between IC and OC for most biomechanical properties. Aneurysms with greater biomechanical differences between IC and OC trended toward being older (p = 0.096) with larger diameters (p = 0.051) compared to other aneurysms. Asymmetric bulging exhibited lower stiffness and transition zone stress in the OC, but no difference in delamination strength between regions.

Conclusions: Regional biomechanical differences exist in aneurysms of the ascending aorta to a similar extent as in healthy aortas. In aneurysms, biomechanical properties of the IC and OC regions were strongly linearly correlated, suggesting that the regional differences in ascending aortic biomechanics are less important than the large biomechanical variability that exists between patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信