Mingkai Wang, Robert Dawe, Sally Ibbotson, Ewan Eadie
{"title":"口服补骨脂素光化学治疗(PUVA)患者眼部保护的研究。","authors":"Mingkai Wang, Robert Dawe, Sally Ibbotson, Ewan Eadie","doi":"10.1007/s43630-025-00714-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the effectiveness of ultraviolet (UV) protection provided by various types of glasses for patients who have orally ingested psoralen. Psoralen is administered orally by patients, as part of PUVA photochemotherapy, 2 h prior to ultraviolet-A exposure. For 12-24 h post psoralen ingestion, there is a potential risk of ocular damage from solar UV (Lerman et al. in J Investig Dermatol 74(4):197-199, 1980). The patients must, therefore, wear eye protection during this period. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of commonly used eyewear for ocular protection during PUVA therapy. A range of glasses, including commercially available sunglasses, prescription sunglasses, prescription glasses without UV protection, and UV protective eyewear, were evaluated. The UV transmission rates of the lenses were measured using a spectrophotometer, followed by a spectroradiometer experiment with a UVA light source to assess the relative UV exposure of the eyewear. The results indicate that while standard UV-protective glasses effectively block UV transmission through the lens, real-world scenarios reveal that inadequate frame coverage can significantly reduce overall eye protection. This highlights the limitation of relying solely on lens transmission as a measure of protection and underscores the critical role of selecting well-designed frames with proper fit for patients during psoralen photosensitisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":98,"journal":{"name":"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"705-713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation into eye protection for patients receiving oral psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA).\",\"authors\":\"Mingkai Wang, Robert Dawe, Sally Ibbotson, Ewan Eadie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43630-025-00714-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the effectiveness of ultraviolet (UV) protection provided by various types of glasses for patients who have orally ingested psoralen. Psoralen is administered orally by patients, as part of PUVA photochemotherapy, 2 h prior to ultraviolet-A exposure. For 12-24 h post psoralen ingestion, there is a potential risk of ocular damage from solar UV (Lerman et al. in J Investig Dermatol 74(4):197-199, 1980). The patients must, therefore, wear eye protection during this period. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of commonly used eyewear for ocular protection during PUVA therapy. A range of glasses, including commercially available sunglasses, prescription sunglasses, prescription glasses without UV protection, and UV protective eyewear, were evaluated. The UV transmission rates of the lenses were measured using a spectrophotometer, followed by a spectroradiometer experiment with a UVA light source to assess the relative UV exposure of the eyewear. The results indicate that while standard UV-protective glasses effectively block UV transmission through the lens, real-world scenarios reveal that inadequate frame coverage can significantly reduce overall eye protection. This highlights the limitation of relying solely on lens transmission as a measure of protection and underscores the critical role of selecting well-designed frames with proper fit for patients during psoralen photosensitisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":98,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"705-713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-025-00714-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-025-00714-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究探讨了口服补骨脂素的患者使用不同类型的眼镜所提供的紫外线防护效果。补骨脂素在紫外线照射前2小时口服,作为PUVA光化学疗法的一部分。补骨脂素摄入后12-24小时,太阳紫外线对眼部有损伤的潜在风险(Lerman et al. journal investigation Dermatol 74(4):197- 199,1980)。因此,患者在此期间必须佩戴护眼设备。本研究的目的是评估在PUVA治疗期间常用的眼镜对眼部保护的有效性。评估了一系列眼镜,包括市售太阳镜、处方太阳镜、无防紫外线的处方眼镜和防紫外线眼镜。使用分光光度计测量镜片的紫外线透过率,然后使用UVA光源进行光谱辐射计实验,以评估眼镜的相对紫外线暴露。结果表明,虽然标准的防紫外线眼镜可以有效地阻挡紫外线通过镜片的传播,但现实情况表明,镜框覆盖率不足会显著降低整体的眼睛保护能力。这突出了仅仅依靠晶状体透射作为一种保护措施的局限性,并强调了在补骨脂光敏过程中选择合适的设计良好的镜框的关键作用。
An investigation into eye protection for patients receiving oral psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA).
This study investigates the effectiveness of ultraviolet (UV) protection provided by various types of glasses for patients who have orally ingested psoralen. Psoralen is administered orally by patients, as part of PUVA photochemotherapy, 2 h prior to ultraviolet-A exposure. For 12-24 h post psoralen ingestion, there is a potential risk of ocular damage from solar UV (Lerman et al. in J Investig Dermatol 74(4):197-199, 1980). The patients must, therefore, wear eye protection during this period. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of commonly used eyewear for ocular protection during PUVA therapy. A range of glasses, including commercially available sunglasses, prescription sunglasses, prescription glasses without UV protection, and UV protective eyewear, were evaluated. The UV transmission rates of the lenses were measured using a spectrophotometer, followed by a spectroradiometer experiment with a UVA light source to assess the relative UV exposure of the eyewear. The results indicate that while standard UV-protective glasses effectively block UV transmission through the lens, real-world scenarios reveal that inadequate frame coverage can significantly reduce overall eye protection. This highlights the limitation of relying solely on lens transmission as a measure of protection and underscores the critical role of selecting well-designed frames with proper fit for patients during psoralen photosensitisation.