不同手术入路治疗胫骨平台过伸性骨折的疗效分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-03-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/TOIF6752
Bo Zhang, Lixin Xu, Shiqin Gu, Yongfeng Yao
{"title":"不同手术入路治疗胫骨平台过伸性骨折的疗效分析。","authors":"Bo Zhang, Lixin Xu, Shiqin Gu, Yongfeng Yao","doi":"10.62347/TOIF6752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacies of an anteromedial combined with anterolateral approach versus posteromedial combined with anterolateral approach in the treatment of hyperextension tibial plateau fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 112 patients with hyperextension tibial plateau fractures treated in the Orthopedics Department of No. 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry from January 2020 to December 2022. The patients were categorized as the control group (anteromedial combined with anterolateral approach, n=62) and the observation group (posteromedial combined with anterolateral approach, n=60) in accordance with the surgical approaches they underwent. Clinical outcomes, surgical time, time needed to be able to undertake weight-bearing activities, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores, and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Knee joint function was assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system. Changes in the posterior tibial slope and varus angles were evaluated using X-ray imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients recovered from tibial plateau fractures after treatment, with their knee joint function returning to pre-injury status to a large degree. At 6 months postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference in HSS knee scores between the two groups (P=0.775). However, at 12 months postoperatively, the HSS knee scores in the control group were significantly lower than those in the observation group (P < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of patients demonstrating excellent or good knee function was significantly lower in the control group than that in the observation group (P=0.041). In terms of pain evaluation, the VAS pain scores of patients were higher in the control group than those in the observation group on days 1 and 3 after surgery (P < 0.001), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups on postoperative day 12 (P=0.337). At 6 months postoperatively, the posterior tibial slope angle was larger in the control group than that in the observation group (P < 0.01). The time needed to be able to undertake weight-bearing activities was markedly longer and the varus angle greater in the observation group than those in the control group on the day of surgery (P < 0.01). Lastly, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The posteromedial combined with anterolateral approach for treating hyperextension tibial plateau fractures has presented ideal clinical outcomes, reduced patients' pain, and promoted the recovery of their joint function without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 3","pages":"1718-1727"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacies of different surgical approaches in the treatment of hyperextension tibial plateau fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Zhang, Lixin Xu, Shiqin Gu, Yongfeng Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/TOIF6752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacies of an anteromedial combined with anterolateral approach versus posteromedial combined with anterolateral approach in the treatment of hyperextension tibial plateau fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 112 patients with hyperextension tibial plateau fractures treated in the Orthopedics Department of No. 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry from January 2020 to December 2022. The patients were categorized as the control group (anteromedial combined with anterolateral approach, n=62) and the observation group (posteromedial combined with anterolateral approach, n=60) in accordance with the surgical approaches they underwent. Clinical outcomes, surgical time, time needed to be able to undertake weight-bearing activities, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores, and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Knee joint function was assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system. Changes in the posterior tibial slope and varus angles were evaluated using X-ray imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients recovered from tibial plateau fractures after treatment, with their knee joint function returning to pre-injury status to a large degree. At 6 months postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference in HSS knee scores between the two groups (P=0.775). However, at 12 months postoperatively, the HSS knee scores in the control group were significantly lower than those in the observation group (P < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of patients demonstrating excellent or good knee function was significantly lower in the control group than that in the observation group (P=0.041). In terms of pain evaluation, the VAS pain scores of patients were higher in the control group than those in the observation group on days 1 and 3 after surgery (P < 0.001), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups on postoperative day 12 (P=0.337). At 6 months postoperatively, the posterior tibial slope angle was larger in the control group than that in the observation group (P < 0.01). The time needed to be able to undertake weight-bearing activities was markedly longer and the varus angle greater in the observation group than those in the control group on the day of surgery (P < 0.01). Lastly, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The posteromedial combined with anterolateral approach for treating hyperextension tibial plateau fractures has presented ideal clinical outcomes, reduced patients' pain, and promoted the recovery of their joint function without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"1718-1727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982877/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of translational research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/TOIF6752\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/TOIF6752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨前内侧联合前外侧入路与后内侧联合前外侧入路治疗胫骨平台过伸性骨折的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年12月陕西核工业第215医院骨科收治的112例胫骨平台过伸性骨折患者的资料。根据手术入路的不同,将患者分为对照组(前内侧联合前外侧入路,n=62)和观察组(后内侧联合前外侧入路,n=60)。比较两组患者的临床结局、手术时间、能够进行负重活动所需时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分及术后并发症发生率。采用特殊外科医院(HSS)膝关节评分系统评估膝关节功能。使用x线影像评估胫骨后斜度和内翻角度的变化。结果:所有患者治疗后胫骨平台骨折均恢复,膝关节功能在很大程度上恢复到损伤前状态。术后6个月,两组患者HSS膝关节评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.775)。然而,在术后12个月,对照组的HSS膝关节评分明显低于观察组(P < 0.001)。对照组患者膝关节功能优良率显著低于观察组(P=0.041)。在疼痛评价方面,对照组患者术后第1天、第3天VAS疼痛评分高于观察组(P < 0.001),术后第12天两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.337)。术后6个月,对照组胫骨后斜角大于观察组(P < 0.01)。手术当日观察组能进行负重活动的时间明显长于对照组,内翻角度明显大于对照组(P < 0.01)。两组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.045)。结论:后内侧联合前外侧入路治疗胫骨平台过伸性骨折临床效果理想,减轻患者疼痛,促进关节功能恢复,且未增加不良反应发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacies of different surgical approaches in the treatment of hyperextension tibial plateau fractures.

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacies of an anteromedial combined with anterolateral approach versus posteromedial combined with anterolateral approach in the treatment of hyperextension tibial plateau fractures.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 112 patients with hyperextension tibial plateau fractures treated in the Orthopedics Department of No. 215 Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry from January 2020 to December 2022. The patients were categorized as the control group (anteromedial combined with anterolateral approach, n=62) and the observation group (posteromedial combined with anterolateral approach, n=60) in accordance with the surgical approaches they underwent. Clinical outcomes, surgical time, time needed to be able to undertake weight-bearing activities, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores, and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Knee joint function was assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system. Changes in the posterior tibial slope and varus angles were evaluated using X-ray imaging.

Results: All patients recovered from tibial plateau fractures after treatment, with their knee joint function returning to pre-injury status to a large degree. At 6 months postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference in HSS knee scores between the two groups (P=0.775). However, at 12 months postoperatively, the HSS knee scores in the control group were significantly lower than those in the observation group (P < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of patients demonstrating excellent or good knee function was significantly lower in the control group than that in the observation group (P=0.041). In terms of pain evaluation, the VAS pain scores of patients were higher in the control group than those in the observation group on days 1 and 3 after surgery (P < 0.001), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups on postoperative day 12 (P=0.337). At 6 months postoperatively, the posterior tibial slope angle was larger in the control group than that in the observation group (P < 0.01). The time needed to be able to undertake weight-bearing activities was markedly longer and the varus angle greater in the observation group than those in the control group on the day of surgery (P < 0.01). Lastly, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.045).

Conclusion: The posteromedial combined with anterolateral approach for treating hyperextension tibial plateau fractures has presented ideal clinical outcomes, reduced patients' pain, and promoted the recovery of their joint function without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信