Mohamed Ezzat M Mansour, Khalid Radwan Alsaadany, Mohamed Awad E Ahmed, Ahmed Ezzat Elmetwalli, Ibrahim Serag
{"title":"非侵入性脑刺激治疗边缘型人格障碍：系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohamed Ezzat M Mansour, Khalid Radwan Alsaadany, Mohamed Awad E Ahmed, Ahmed Ezzat Elmetwalli, Ibrahim Serag","doi":"10.1186/s12991-025-00561-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a complex neuropsychiatric condition characterized by four main symptom domains: emotion dysregulation, behavioral dysregulation, self-image disturbances, and interpersonal instability. While psychotherapy remains the primary treatment, there is a need for additional effective interventions. Given the neuromodulatory effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), these methods may hold potential for addressing BPD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A literature search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL) identified comparative studies assessing the effects of NIBS in BPD. The primary outcome was impulsivity, measured by the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11). Secondary outcomes included Depressive symptoms, which were evaluated using different scales such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and the Beck depression Inventory (BDI) scale, and anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with a total of 103 patients were included. Regarding impulsivity, tDCS 2 mA showed a significant reduction compared to the control group (MD = -11.67, 95% CI [-21.44, -1.90]). For depressive symptoms, TMS 20 Hz ranked highest (SMD = -1.97, 95% CI [-3.51, -0.43]), followed by tDCS 2 mA (SMD = -1.65, 95% CI [-2.97, -0.34]). In terms of anxiety, both TMS 5 Hz (MD = -12.29, 95% CI [-24.57, -0.01]) and tDCS 2 mA (MD = -11.81, 95% CI [-17.39, -6.23]) showed significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary evidence suggests potential efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for BPD, with well-tolerated side effects with well-tolerated side effects. Although there are noticeable statistically significant differences between the interventions and control groups, the results are inconclusive due to the small sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":7942,"journal":{"name":"Annals of General Psychiatry","volume":"24 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive brain stimulation for borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Ezzat M Mansour, Khalid Radwan Alsaadany, Mohamed Awad E Ahmed, Ahmed Ezzat Elmetwalli, Ibrahim Serag\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12991-025-00561-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a complex neuropsychiatric condition characterized by four main symptom domains: emotion dysregulation, behavioral dysregulation, self-image disturbances, and interpersonal instability. While psychotherapy remains the primary treatment, there is a need for additional effective interventions. Given the neuromodulatory effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), these methods may hold potential for addressing BPD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A literature search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL) identified comparative studies assessing the effects of NIBS in BPD. The primary outcome was impulsivity, measured by the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11). Secondary outcomes included Depressive symptoms, which were evaluated using different scales such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and the Beck depression Inventory (BDI) scale, and anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with a total of 103 patients were included. Regarding impulsivity, tDCS 2 mA showed a significant reduction compared to the control group (MD = -11.67, 95% CI [-21.44, -1.90]). For depressive symptoms, TMS 20 Hz ranked highest (SMD = -1.97, 95% CI [-3.51, -0.43]), followed by tDCS 2 mA (SMD = -1.65, 95% CI [-2.97, -0.34]). In terms of anxiety, both TMS 5 Hz (MD = -12.29, 95% CI [-24.57, -0.01]) and tDCS 2 mA (MD = -11.81, 95% CI [-17.39, -6.23]) showed significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary evidence suggests potential efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for BPD, with well-tolerated side effects with well-tolerated side effects. Although there are noticeable statistically significant differences between the interventions and control groups, the results are inconclusive due to the small sample.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of General Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004652/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of General Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-025-00561-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-025-00561-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-invasive brain stimulation for borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Introduction: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a complex neuropsychiatric condition characterized by four main symptom domains: emotion dysregulation, behavioral dysregulation, self-image disturbances, and interpersonal instability. While psychotherapy remains the primary treatment, there is a need for additional effective interventions. Given the neuromodulatory effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), these methods may hold potential for addressing BPD symptoms.
Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A literature search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL) identified comparative studies assessing the effects of NIBS in BPD. The primary outcome was impulsivity, measured by the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11). Secondary outcomes included Depressive symptoms, which were evaluated using different scales such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and the Beck depression Inventory (BDI) scale, and anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA).
Results: Five studies with a total of 103 patients were included. Regarding impulsivity, tDCS 2 mA showed a significant reduction compared to the control group (MD = -11.67, 95% CI [-21.44, -1.90]). For depressive symptoms, TMS 20 Hz ranked highest (SMD = -1.97, 95% CI [-3.51, -0.43]), followed by tDCS 2 mA (SMD = -1.65, 95% CI [-2.97, -0.34]). In terms of anxiety, both TMS 5 Hz (MD = -12.29, 95% CI [-24.57, -0.01]) and tDCS 2 mA (MD = -11.81, 95% CI [-17.39, -6.23]) showed significant differences.
Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests potential efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for BPD, with well-tolerated side effects with well-tolerated side effects. Although there are noticeable statistically significant differences between the interventions and control groups, the results are inconclusive due to the small sample.
期刊介绍：
Annals of General Psychiatry considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychiatry, including neuroscience and psychological medicine. Both basic and clinical neuroscience contributions are encouraged.
Annals of General Psychiatry emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health and strongly supports and follows the principles of evidence-based medicine. As an open access journal, Annals of General Psychiatry facilitates the worldwide distribution of high quality psychiatry and mental health research. The journal considers submissions on a wide range of topics including, but not limited to, psychopharmacology, forensic psychiatry, psychotic disorders, psychiatric genetics, and mood and anxiety disorders.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
