肝细胞癌LR-M类病变的预测因素,一项多机构分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Marybeth Nedrud, Tanya Wolfson, Brian Allen, Anum Aslam, Lauren Burke, Victoria Chernyak, Kathryn Fowler, Tyler J Fraum, Hong-Il Ha, Elizabeth M Hecht, Tracy Jaffe, Kevin Kalisz, Andrea Siobhan Kierans, Daniel R Ludwig, Jasnit S Makkar, Katrina McGinty, Matthew McInnes, Mishal Mendiratta-Lala, Omobonike Oloruntoba, Damithri Ranathunga, Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner, Anthony C Gamst, Diana M Cardona, Andrew Muir, Mustafa Bashir
{"title":"肝细胞癌LR-M类病变的预测因素,一项多机构分析。","authors":"Marybeth Nedrud, Tanya Wolfson, Brian Allen, Anum Aslam, Lauren Burke, Victoria Chernyak, Kathryn Fowler, Tyler J Fraum, Hong-Il Ha, Elizabeth M Hecht, Tracy Jaffe, Kevin Kalisz, Andrea Siobhan Kierans, Daniel R Ludwig, Jasnit S Makkar, Katrina McGinty, Matthew McInnes, Mishal Mendiratta-Lala, Omobonike Oloruntoba, Damithri Ranathunga, Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner, Anthony C Gamst, Diana M Cardona, Andrew Muir, Mustafa Bashir","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04960-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) provides a framework for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, LR-5). However, not all HCCs meet LR-5 criteria and are instead categorized as LR-M, probably or definitely malignant but not specific for HCC, necessitating biopsy for diagnosis. The purpose is to identify factors associated with HCC in LR-M observations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an IRB-approved, retrospective analysis of participants from 8 institutions that had a LR-M observation on CT or MRI with corresponding histopathologic diagnosis. Demographics and biochemical data were examined. Central review using the LI-RADS v2018 algorithm was performed. Kappa statistics defined inter-reader agreement. Random forest and logistic regression analyses generated a model for HCC diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>162 participants with 162 LR-M observations were included. 46% of observations (74/162) were HCC and 37% were cholangiocarcinoma (60/162). Two of 34 imaging features- observation size and intra-lesion iron- showed moderate to strong inter-reader agreement (Kappa ≥ 0.60) while the remainder showed weak or no agreement (Kappa < 0.60). Random forest analysis showed biochemical features to be more predictive of HCC than imaging features. Logistic regression analysis of a model based on INR and AFP provided a 72% sensitivity and 61% specificity for HCC by Youden's index and a 90% specificity threshold yielded 38% sensitivity, 75% positive predictive value, and 66% negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show INR and AFP are associated with HCC in LR-M observations. A high-specificity threshold may assist in the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in the appropriate setting. In certain at-risk patients with a LR-M observation on diagnostic imaging, serum AFP and INR maybe useful tools for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in LR-M category lesions, a multi-institutional analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marybeth Nedrud, Tanya Wolfson, Brian Allen, Anum Aslam, Lauren Burke, Victoria Chernyak, Kathryn Fowler, Tyler J Fraum, Hong-Il Ha, Elizabeth M Hecht, Tracy Jaffe, Kevin Kalisz, Andrea Siobhan Kierans, Daniel R Ludwig, Jasnit S Makkar, Katrina McGinty, Matthew McInnes, Mishal Mendiratta-Lala, Omobonike Oloruntoba, Damithri Ranathunga, Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner, Anthony C Gamst, Diana M Cardona, Andrew Muir, Mustafa Bashir\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04960-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) provides a framework for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, LR-5). However, not all HCCs meet LR-5 criteria and are instead categorized as LR-M, probably or definitely malignant but not specific for HCC, necessitating biopsy for diagnosis. The purpose is to identify factors associated with HCC in LR-M observations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an IRB-approved, retrospective analysis of participants from 8 institutions that had a LR-M observation on CT or MRI with corresponding histopathologic diagnosis. Demographics and biochemical data were examined. Central review using the LI-RADS v2018 algorithm was performed. Kappa statistics defined inter-reader agreement. Random forest and logistic regression analyses generated a model for HCC diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>162 participants with 162 LR-M observations were included. 46% of observations (74/162) were HCC and 37% were cholangiocarcinoma (60/162). Two of 34 imaging features- observation size and intra-lesion iron- showed moderate to strong inter-reader agreement (Kappa ≥ 0.60) while the remainder showed weak or no agreement (Kappa < 0.60). Random forest analysis showed biochemical features to be more predictive of HCC than imaging features. Logistic regression analysis of a model based on INR and AFP provided a 72% sensitivity and 61% specificity for HCC by Youden's index and a 90% specificity threshold yielded 38% sensitivity, 75% positive predictive value, and 66% negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show INR and AFP are associated with HCC in LR-M observations. A high-specificity threshold may assist in the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in the appropriate setting. In certain at-risk patients with a LR-M observation on diagnostic imaging, serum AFP and INR maybe useful tools for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04960-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04960-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肝脏影像学报告和数据系统(LI-RADS, LR)为肝细胞癌(HCC, LR-5)的诊断提供了一个框架。然而,并不是所有的HCC都符合LR-5标准,而是被归类为LR-M,可能或肯定是恶性的,但不是HCC特异性的,需要活检进行诊断。目的是在LR-M观察中确定与HCC相关的因素。方法:这是一项irb批准的回顾性分析,来自8家机构的参与者在CT或MRI上进行了LR-M观察并进行相应的组织病理学诊断。对人口统计学和生化数据进行了检查。使用LI-RADS v2018算法进行中央评审。Kappa统计定义了读者间协议。随机森林和逻辑回归分析生成了HCC诊断模型。结果:纳入162名参与者,162例LR-M观察。46%(74/162)为HCC, 37%为胆管癌(60/162)。34个影像学特征中的两个——观察区大小和病变内铁——显示中等至强的读间一致性(Kappa≥0.60),而其余的显示弱一致性或无一致性(Kappa结论:我们的研究结果显示,在LR-M观察中,INR和AFP与HCC相关。在适当的情况下,高特异性阈值可能有助于HCC的非侵入性诊断。在某些具有LR-M诊断影像观察的高危患者中,血清AFP和INR可能是HCC无创诊断的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in LR-M category lesions, a multi-institutional analysis.

Purpose: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) provides a framework for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, LR-5). However, not all HCCs meet LR-5 criteria and are instead categorized as LR-M, probably or definitely malignant but not specific for HCC, necessitating biopsy for diagnosis. The purpose is to identify factors associated with HCC in LR-M observations.

Methods: This is an IRB-approved, retrospective analysis of participants from 8 institutions that had a LR-M observation on CT or MRI with corresponding histopathologic diagnosis. Demographics and biochemical data were examined. Central review using the LI-RADS v2018 algorithm was performed. Kappa statistics defined inter-reader agreement. Random forest and logistic regression analyses generated a model for HCC diagnosis.

Results: 162 participants with 162 LR-M observations were included. 46% of observations (74/162) were HCC and 37% were cholangiocarcinoma (60/162). Two of 34 imaging features- observation size and intra-lesion iron- showed moderate to strong inter-reader agreement (Kappa ≥ 0.60) while the remainder showed weak or no agreement (Kappa < 0.60). Random forest analysis showed biochemical features to be more predictive of HCC than imaging features. Logistic regression analysis of a model based on INR and AFP provided a 72% sensitivity and 61% specificity for HCC by Youden's index and a 90% specificity threshold yielded 38% sensitivity, 75% positive predictive value, and 66% negative predictive value.

Conclusions: Our results show INR and AFP are associated with HCC in LR-M observations. A high-specificity threshold may assist in the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in the appropriate setting. In certain at-risk patients with a LR-M observation on diagnostic imaging, serum AFP and INR maybe useful tools for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信