315例平顶苔藓伴额部纤维性脱发的全身治疗。

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Mathias Willaert, Tristan Van Dongen, Petra Dikrama, Tamar Nijsten, DirkJan Hijnen, Rick Waalboer-Spuij
{"title":"315例平顶苔藓伴额部纤维性脱发的全身治疗。","authors":"Mathias Willaert, Tristan Van Dongen, Petra Dikrama, Tamar Nijsten, DirkJan Hijnen, Rick Waalboer-Spuij","doi":"10.2340/actadv.v105.42465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia are common variants of primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecia, leading to permanent hair loss. Despite widespread use of various systemic treatments, evidence-based guidelines for these conditions are lacking. This study investigates the effectiveness of systemic treatment options in patients with lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia through a retrospective cohort analysis. Medical records of patients treated at the Department of Dermatology between 2016 and 2022 at the Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands were reviewed. Of 315 patients identified (161 lichen planopilaris and 154 frontal fibrosing alopecia), the majority were female (90.5%), with hydroxychloroquine being the most common systemic treatment, used by 65.2% of lichen planopilaris and 57.8% of frontal fibrosing alopecia patients. Methotrexate had the highest response rate for lichen planopilaris (79.2%), while retinoids showed the highest response for frontal fibrosing alopecia (73.9%). However, treatments with cyclosporine A and retinoids had higher discontinuation rates due to side effects. This study suggests methotrexate and cyclosporine A may be most effective for lichen planopilaris, and cyclosporine A and retinoids for frontal fibrosing alopecia, though side effects remain a concern. Limitations include the retrospective design and the absence of standardized outcomes. Prospective studies are recommended to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":6944,"journal":{"name":"Acta dermato-venereologica","volume":"105 ","pages":"adv42465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic Treatments for Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Retrospective Study of 315 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mathias Willaert, Tristan Van Dongen, Petra Dikrama, Tamar Nijsten, DirkJan Hijnen, Rick Waalboer-Spuij\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/actadv.v105.42465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia are common variants of primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecia, leading to permanent hair loss. Despite widespread use of various systemic treatments, evidence-based guidelines for these conditions are lacking. This study investigates the effectiveness of systemic treatment options in patients with lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia through a retrospective cohort analysis. Medical records of patients treated at the Department of Dermatology between 2016 and 2022 at the Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands were reviewed. Of 315 patients identified (161 lichen planopilaris and 154 frontal fibrosing alopecia), the majority were female (90.5%), with hydroxychloroquine being the most common systemic treatment, used by 65.2% of lichen planopilaris and 57.8% of frontal fibrosing alopecia patients. Methotrexate had the highest response rate for lichen planopilaris (79.2%), while retinoids showed the highest response for frontal fibrosing alopecia (73.9%). However, treatments with cyclosporine A and retinoids had higher discontinuation rates due to side effects. This study suggests methotrexate and cyclosporine A may be most effective for lichen planopilaris, and cyclosporine A and retinoids for frontal fibrosing alopecia, though side effects remain a concern. Limitations include the retrospective design and the absence of standardized outcomes. Prospective studies are recommended to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta dermato-venereologica\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"adv42465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053385/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta dermato-venereologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.42465\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta dermato-venereologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.42465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扁平苔藓和额部纤维化性脱发是原发性淋巴细胞性瘢痕性脱发的常见变种,导致永久性脱发。尽管广泛使用各种系统治疗,但缺乏针对这些疾病的循证指南。本研究通过回顾性队列分析探讨了系统治疗方案对扁平苔藓和额部纤维化性脱发患者的有效性。对2016年至2022年在荷兰鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学医学中心皮肤科接受治疗的患者的医疗记录进行了审查。在315例确诊患者中(161例扁平苔藓性脱发和154例额部纤维化性脱发),大多数为女性(90.5%),羟氯喹是最常见的全身治疗,65.2%的扁平苔藓性脱发和57.8%的额部纤维化性脱发患者使用羟氯喹。甲氨蝶呤对扁平苔藓的有效率最高(79.2%),类维甲酸对额部纤维化性脱发的有效率最高(73.9%)。然而,由于副作用,环孢素A和类维甲酸治疗有较高的停药率。这项研究表明甲氨蝶呤和环孢素A可能对扁平苔藓最有效,环孢素A和类维生素A对额部纤维化性脱发最有效,尽管副作用仍然值得关注。局限性包括回顾性设计和缺乏标准化结果。建议进行前瞻性研究以验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systemic Treatments for Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Retrospective Study of 315 Patients.

Lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia are common variants of primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecia, leading to permanent hair loss. Despite widespread use of various systemic treatments, evidence-based guidelines for these conditions are lacking. This study investigates the effectiveness of systemic treatment options in patients with lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia through a retrospective cohort analysis. Medical records of patients treated at the Department of Dermatology between 2016 and 2022 at the Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands were reviewed. Of 315 patients identified (161 lichen planopilaris and 154 frontal fibrosing alopecia), the majority were female (90.5%), with hydroxychloroquine being the most common systemic treatment, used by 65.2% of lichen planopilaris and 57.8% of frontal fibrosing alopecia patients. Methotrexate had the highest response rate for lichen planopilaris (79.2%), while retinoids showed the highest response for frontal fibrosing alopecia (73.9%). However, treatments with cyclosporine A and retinoids had higher discontinuation rates due to side effects. This study suggests methotrexate and cyclosporine A may be most effective for lichen planopilaris, and cyclosporine A and retinoids for frontal fibrosing alopecia, though side effects remain a concern. Limitations include the retrospective design and the absence of standardized outcomes. Prospective studies are recommended to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta dermato-venereologica
Acta dermato-venereologica 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Dermato-Venereologica publishes high-quality manuscripts in English in the field of Dermatology and Venereology, dealing with new observations on basic dermatological and venereological research, as well as clinical investigations. Each volume also features a number of Review articles in special areas, as well as short Letters to the Editor to stimulate debate and to disseminate important clinical observations. Acta Dermato-Venereologica has rapid publication times and is amply illustrated with a large number of colour photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信