{"title":"2017年至2023年佐治亚州石材台面加工车间工人的可呼吸性粉尘和可呼吸性结晶二氧化硅暴露。","authors":"Jhy-Charm Soo, Jenny Houlroyd, Hilarie Warren, Brandon J Philpot, Sean Castillo","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This longitudinal study examines the severity of worker exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and respirable dust and demonstrates the need for increased education and implementation of both appropriate engineering controls and respiratory protection (RP) programs for stone fabricator shops, given the growing global number of accelerated silicosis cases associated with the fabrication of engineered stone (ES) countertops.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Personal air sampling results and detailed job description notes obtained from 17 industrial hygiene air sampling visits conducted at 11 stone fabrication facilities between 2017 and 2023 in Georgia were used to align similar exposure groups (SEGs) for tasks for workers performing stone fabrication. Bayesian decision analysis was used to determine appropriate RP selection recommendations for the 4 proposed SEGs: SEG1-Support, SEG2-Automated Tool Operator, SEG 3-Small Tool Operator, and SEG 4-Fabrication/Lamination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis concluded that all employees in stone fabrication shops that process ES should wear a respirator with a minimum assigned protection factor (APF) of 10, regardless of the engineering controls in place. For SEG 4, it is recommended that workers use respirators with an APF between 50 and 1,000. Among the 75 full-shift personal air samples for RCS dust, 41 samples (53%) exceeded the permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m³.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to present the 4 SEG categories with sampling data to support the importance of including all employees (even support workers) in RP programs, exposure monitoring, and medical surveillance.</p><p><strong>Recommendation and implications: </strong>Employers, occupational health professionals, and inspectors may use these SEG categories and corresponding RP recommendations to determine if employees have received appropriate RP for workers at stone countertop fabrication shops.</p>","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":" ","pages":"473-485"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respirable dust and respirable crystalline silica exposures among workers at stone countertop fabrication shops in Georgia from 2017 through 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Jhy-Charm Soo, Jenny Houlroyd, Hilarie Warren, Brandon J Philpot, Sean Castillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/annweh/wxaf014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This longitudinal study examines the severity of worker exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and respirable dust and demonstrates the need for increased education and implementation of both appropriate engineering controls and respiratory protection (RP) programs for stone fabricator shops, given the growing global number of accelerated silicosis cases associated with the fabrication of engineered stone (ES) countertops.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Personal air sampling results and detailed job description notes obtained from 17 industrial hygiene air sampling visits conducted at 11 stone fabrication facilities between 2017 and 2023 in Georgia were used to align similar exposure groups (SEGs) for tasks for workers performing stone fabrication. Bayesian decision analysis was used to determine appropriate RP selection recommendations for the 4 proposed SEGs: SEG1-Support, SEG2-Automated Tool Operator, SEG 3-Small Tool Operator, and SEG 4-Fabrication/Lamination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis concluded that all employees in stone fabrication shops that process ES should wear a respirator with a minimum assigned protection factor (APF) of 10, regardless of the engineering controls in place. For SEG 4, it is recommended that workers use respirators with an APF between 50 and 1,000. Among the 75 full-shift personal air samples for RCS dust, 41 samples (53%) exceeded the permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m³.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to present the 4 SEG categories with sampling data to support the importance of including all employees (even support workers) in RP programs, exposure monitoring, and medical surveillance.</p><p><strong>Recommendation and implications: </strong>Employers, occupational health professionals, and inspectors may use these SEG categories and corresponding RP recommendations to determine if employees have received appropriate RP for workers at stone countertop fabrication shops.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"473-485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208359/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Respirable dust and respirable crystalline silica exposures among workers at stone countertop fabrication shops in Georgia from 2017 through 2023.
Objectives: This longitudinal study examines the severity of worker exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and respirable dust and demonstrates the need for increased education and implementation of both appropriate engineering controls and respiratory protection (RP) programs for stone fabricator shops, given the growing global number of accelerated silicosis cases associated with the fabrication of engineered stone (ES) countertops.
Methods: Personal air sampling results and detailed job description notes obtained from 17 industrial hygiene air sampling visits conducted at 11 stone fabrication facilities between 2017 and 2023 in Georgia were used to align similar exposure groups (SEGs) for tasks for workers performing stone fabrication. Bayesian decision analysis was used to determine appropriate RP selection recommendations for the 4 proposed SEGs: SEG1-Support, SEG2-Automated Tool Operator, SEG 3-Small Tool Operator, and SEG 4-Fabrication/Lamination.
Results: The analysis concluded that all employees in stone fabrication shops that process ES should wear a respirator with a minimum assigned protection factor (APF) of 10, regardless of the engineering controls in place. For SEG 4, it is recommended that workers use respirators with an APF between 50 and 1,000. Among the 75 full-shift personal air samples for RCS dust, 41 samples (53%) exceeded the permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m³.
Conclusions: This is the first study to present the 4 SEG categories with sampling data to support the importance of including all employees (even support workers) in RP programs, exposure monitoring, and medical surveillance.
Recommendation and implications: Employers, occupational health professionals, and inspectors may use these SEG categories and corresponding RP recommendations to determine if employees have received appropriate RP for workers at stone countertop fabrication shops.
期刊介绍:
About the Journal
Annals of Work Exposures and Health is dedicated to presenting advances in exposure science supporting the recognition, quantification, and control of exposures at work, and epidemiological studies on their effects on human health and well-being. A key question we apply to submission is, "Is this paper going to help readers better understand, quantify, and control conditions at work that adversely or positively affect health and well-being?"
We are interested in high quality scientific research addressing:
the quantification of work exposures, including chemical, biological, physical, biomechanical, and psychosocial, and the elements of work organization giving rise to such exposures;
the relationship between these exposures and the acute and chronic health consequences for those exposed and their families and communities;
populations at special risk of work-related exposures including women, under-represented minorities, immigrants, and other vulnerable groups such as temporary, contingent and informal sector workers;
the effectiveness of interventions addressing exposure and risk including production technologies, work process engineering, and personal protective systems;
policies and management approaches to reduce risk and improve health and well-being among workers, their families or communities;
methodologies and mechanisms that underlie the quantification and/or control of exposure and risk.
There is heavy pressure on space in the journal, and the above interests mean that we do not usually publish papers that simply report local conditions without generalizable results. We are also unlikely to publish reports on human health and well-being without information on the work exposure characteristics giving rise to the effects. We particularly welcome contributions from scientists based in, or addressing conditions in, developing economies that fall within the above scope.