贝克自杀意念量表在不同样本中的心理测量特性。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Min Eun Jeon, Inna Goncearenco, Megan L Rogers, Marie T Campione, Dorian A Lamis, Nadine J Kaslow, Thomas E Joiner
{"title":"贝克自杀意念量表在不同样本中的心理测量特性。","authors":"Min Eun Jeon, Inna Goncearenco, Megan L Rogers, Marie T Campione, Dorian A Lamis, Nadine J Kaslow, Thomas E Joiner","doi":"10.1177/10731911251330498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicidal ideation disproportionately impacts minoritized populations; yet, these populations have been historically underrepresented in the development and validation of risk assessments, including the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS). The current study investigated the psychometric properties of the BSS in a combined sample (<i>N</i> = 1,026) of minoritized adults to examine its generalizability across diverse identities. Item response theory (IRT) models were estimated, and parameters including differential item functioning (DIF) were evaluated. Results showed that the original BSS and a 5-item BSS devised in a majority-aligning sample had significant model misspecification in the current study's diverse sample, but a reduced 14-item and 8-item scale has good properties and may be better-performing alternatives. DIF results supported measurement invariance of the BSS across race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, social class, and history of suicide attempts. Inclusion of certain suicidal behaviors (e.g., writing a note) into an assessment of suicidal ideation may not be effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251330498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation in a Diverse Sample.\",\"authors\":\"Min Eun Jeon, Inna Goncearenco, Megan L Rogers, Marie T Campione, Dorian A Lamis, Nadine J Kaslow, Thomas E Joiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911251330498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Suicidal ideation disproportionately impacts minoritized populations; yet, these populations have been historically underrepresented in the development and validation of risk assessments, including the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS). The current study investigated the psychometric properties of the BSS in a combined sample (<i>N</i> = 1,026) of minoritized adults to examine its generalizability across diverse identities. Item response theory (IRT) models were estimated, and parameters including differential item functioning (DIF) were evaluated. Results showed that the original BSS and a 5-item BSS devised in a majority-aligning sample had significant model misspecification in the current study's diverse sample, but a reduced 14-item and 8-item scale has good properties and may be better-performing alternatives. DIF results supported measurement invariance of the BSS across race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, social class, and history of suicide attempts. Inclusion of certain suicidal behaviors (e.g., writing a note) into an assessment of suicidal ideation may not be effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911251330498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251330498\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251330498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自杀意念对少数族裔的影响尤为严重;然而,在包括贝克自杀意念量表(BSS)在内的风险评估的开发和验证中,这些人群的历史代表性不足。本研究调查了少数族裔成年人(N = 1026)的BSS的心理测量特性,以检验其在不同身份中的普遍性。评估了项目反应理论(IRT)模型,并评估了差异项目功能(DIF)等参数。结果表明,在当前研究的多样化样本中,原BSS和多数比对样本中设计的5项BSS存在显著的模型错配,而缩减后的14项和8项量表具有良好的性能,可能是更好的替代方案。DIF结果支持不同种族/民族、性取向、社会阶层和自杀企图史的BSS测量不变性。将某些自杀行为(如写遗书)纳入对自杀意念的评估可能并不有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Properties of the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation in a Diverse Sample.

Suicidal ideation disproportionately impacts minoritized populations; yet, these populations have been historically underrepresented in the development and validation of risk assessments, including the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS). The current study investigated the psychometric properties of the BSS in a combined sample (N = 1,026) of minoritized adults to examine its generalizability across diverse identities. Item response theory (IRT) models were estimated, and parameters including differential item functioning (DIF) were evaluated. Results showed that the original BSS and a 5-item BSS devised in a majority-aligning sample had significant model misspecification in the current study's diverse sample, but a reduced 14-item and 8-item scale has good properties and may be better-performing alternatives. DIF results supported measurement invariance of the BSS across race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, social class, and history of suicide attempts. Inclusion of certain suicidal behaviors (e.g., writing a note) into an assessment of suicidal ideation may not be effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信