葡萄原产l(+)-酒石酸:13C/12C和18O/16O稳定同位素比值阈值的定义及实验室间同位素方法的验证

IF 5.6 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Talanta Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128071
Matteo Perini, Silvia Pianezze, Laura Pienti, Giovanna Randi, Pietro Franceschi, Roberto Larcher
{"title":"葡萄原产l(+)-酒石酸:13C/12C和18O/16O稳定同位素比值阈值的定义及实验室间同位素方法的验证","authors":"Matteo Perini, Silvia Pianezze, Laura Pienti, Giovanna Randi, Pietro Franceschi, Roberto Larcher","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>l(+)-tartaric acid is one of the most used additives in the oenological practices. Its properties make it useful as preservative and acidulant in grape-derived products. This additive can be obtained through the extraction from grapes, from other fruits or through synthesis from petrochemical sources. In Europe, only l(+)-tartaric acid from grapes can be added to wine products, but the price difference between the forms could lead to the fraudulent use of the cheaper synthetic l(+)-tartaric acid. In other continents where such limitation is not applied, the clear commercial identification of the products is still desirable. Stable isotope analysis of carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) and oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O) proved to be a robust and effective method in discriminating between synthetic and grape-derived l(+)-tartaric acid. In this study, to define the threshold limits of δ<sup>13</sup>C (above -24.8 ‰) and δ<sup>18</sup>O (above +25.6 ‰) of grape-derived l(+)-tartaric acid, a database consisting of 81 authentic natural samples was created. Moreover, the validation of the isotopic method through an interlaboratory study involving nine European and extra-European laboratories, was provided. The repeatability and the reproducibility standard deviation of the method were calculated.</p>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"293 ","pages":"128071"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"l(+)-tartaric acid of grape origin: Definition of threshold limits for the <sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C and <sup>18</sup>O/<sup>16</sup>O stable isotope ratios and validation of the isotopic method through an interlaboratory study.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Perini, Silvia Pianezze, Laura Pienti, Giovanna Randi, Pietro Franceschi, Roberto Larcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>l(+)-tartaric acid is one of the most used additives in the oenological practices. Its properties make it useful as preservative and acidulant in grape-derived products. This additive can be obtained through the extraction from grapes, from other fruits or through synthesis from petrochemical sources. In Europe, only l(+)-tartaric acid from grapes can be added to wine products, but the price difference between the forms could lead to the fraudulent use of the cheaper synthetic l(+)-tartaric acid. In other continents where such limitation is not applied, the clear commercial identification of the products is still desirable. Stable isotope analysis of carbon (δ<sup>13</sup>C) and oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O) proved to be a robust and effective method in discriminating between synthetic and grape-derived l(+)-tartaric acid. In this study, to define the threshold limits of δ<sup>13</sup>C (above -24.8 ‰) and δ<sup>18</sup>O (above +25.6 ‰) of grape-derived l(+)-tartaric acid, a database consisting of 81 authentic natural samples was created. Moreover, the validation of the isotopic method through an interlaboratory study involving nine European and extra-European laboratories, was provided. The repeatability and the reproducibility standard deviation of the method were calculated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Talanta\",\"volume\":\"293 \",\"pages\":\"128071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Talanta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128071\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128071","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

L(+)-酒石酸是酿酒实践中使用最多的添加剂之一。它的特性使其在葡萄衍生产品中可用作防腐剂和酸化剂。这种添加剂可以从葡萄中提取,也可以从其他水果中提取,也可以从石油化工原料中合成。在欧洲,只有从葡萄中提取的l(+)-酒石酸才能添加到葡萄酒产品中,但两种形式之间的价格差异可能导致更便宜的合成l(+)-酒石酸被欺诈使用。在不适用这种限制的其他大陆,仍然需要对产品进行明确的商业标识。碳(δ13C)和氧(δ18O)的稳定同位素分析被证明是区分合成酒石酸和葡萄衍生酒石酸的一种可靠而有效的方法。为了确定葡萄中l(+)-酒石酸δ13C(-24.8‰以上)和δ18O(+ 25.6‰以上)的阈值,本研究建立了由81个真实天然样品组成的数据库。此外,还提供了通过涉及9个欧洲和欧洲以外实验室的实验室间研究来验证同位素方法的方法。计算了方法的重复性和重复性标准偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
l(+)-tartaric acid of grape origin: Definition of threshold limits for the 13C/12C and 18O/16O stable isotope ratios and validation of the isotopic method through an interlaboratory study.

l(+)-tartaric acid is one of the most used additives in the oenological practices. Its properties make it useful as preservative and acidulant in grape-derived products. This additive can be obtained through the extraction from grapes, from other fruits or through synthesis from petrochemical sources. In Europe, only l(+)-tartaric acid from grapes can be added to wine products, but the price difference between the forms could lead to the fraudulent use of the cheaper synthetic l(+)-tartaric acid. In other continents where such limitation is not applied, the clear commercial identification of the products is still desirable. Stable isotope analysis of carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) proved to be a robust and effective method in discriminating between synthetic and grape-derived l(+)-tartaric acid. In this study, to define the threshold limits of δ13C (above -24.8 ‰) and δ18O (above +25.6 ‰) of grape-derived l(+)-tartaric acid, a database consisting of 81 authentic natural samples was created. Moreover, the validation of the isotopic method through an interlaboratory study involving nine European and extra-European laboratories, was provided. The repeatability and the reproducibility standard deviation of the method were calculated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Talanta
Talanta 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
861
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome. Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信