随机相近似相关能的静态子空间近似:在催化和电化学材料中的应用。

IF 5.5 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Pub Date : 2025-05-13 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01276
Jacob M Clary, Olivia A Hull, Daniel Weinberg, Ravishankar Sundararaman, Mauro Del Ben, Derek Vigil-Fowler
{"title":"随机相近似相关能的静态子空间近似:在催化和电化学材料中的应用。","authors":"Jacob M Clary, Olivia A Hull, Daniel Weinberg, Ravishankar Sundararaman, Mauro Del Ben, Derek Vigil-Fowler","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modeling complex materials using high-fidelity, ab initio methods at low cost is a fundamental goal for quantum chemical software packages. The GW approximation and random phase approximation (RPA) provide a unified description of both electronic structure and total energies using the same physics in a many-body perturbative approach that can be more accurate than generalized-gradient density functional theory (DFT) methods. However, GW/RPA implementations have historically been limited to either specific materials classes or application toward small chemical systems. The static subspace approximation allows for reduced cost full-frequency GW/RPA calculations and has previously been benchmarked thoroughly for GW calculations. Here, we describe our approach to including partial occupations of electronic orbitals in full-frequency GW and RPA calculations for the study of electrocatalysts. We benchmarked RPA total energy calculations using the subspace approximation across a diverse test suite of materials for a variety of computational parameters. The benchmarking quantifies the impact of different extrapolation procedures for representing the static polarizability at infinite screened cutoff, and shows that using screened cutoffs above 20-25 Ryd result in diminishing accuracy returns for predicting RPA total energies. Additionally, for moderately sized electrocatalytic models, 2-3 times fewer computational resources are used to compute RPA total energies by representing the static polarizability with 20-30% of the static subspace basis, with an error of approximately 0.01 eV or better in RPA adsorption energy calculations. Finally, we show that for these electrochemical models RPA can shift DFT adsorption energy shifts by up to 0.5 eV and that GW can frequently shift DFT eigenvalues of surface and adsorbate states by approximately 0.5-1 eV.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":"21 9","pages":"4718-4729"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static Subspace Approximation for Random Phase Approximation Correlation Energies: Applications to Materials for Catalysis and Electrochemistry.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob M Clary, Olivia A Hull, Daniel Weinberg, Ravishankar Sundararaman, Mauro Del Ben, Derek Vigil-Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Modeling complex materials using high-fidelity, ab initio methods at low cost is a fundamental goal for quantum chemical software packages. The GW approximation and random phase approximation (RPA) provide a unified description of both electronic structure and total energies using the same physics in a many-body perturbative approach that can be more accurate than generalized-gradient density functional theory (DFT) methods. However, GW/RPA implementations have historically been limited to either specific materials classes or application toward small chemical systems. The static subspace approximation allows for reduced cost full-frequency GW/RPA calculations and has previously been benchmarked thoroughly for GW calculations. Here, we describe our approach to including partial occupations of electronic orbitals in full-frequency GW and RPA calculations for the study of electrocatalysts. We benchmarked RPA total energy calculations using the subspace approximation across a diverse test suite of materials for a variety of computational parameters. The benchmarking quantifies the impact of different extrapolation procedures for representing the static polarizability at infinite screened cutoff, and shows that using screened cutoffs above 20-25 Ryd result in diminishing accuracy returns for predicting RPA total energies. Additionally, for moderately sized electrocatalytic models, 2-3 times fewer computational resources are used to compute RPA total energies by representing the static polarizability with 20-30% of the static subspace basis, with an error of approximately 0.01 eV or better in RPA adsorption energy calculations. Finally, we show that for these electrochemical models RPA can shift DFT adsorption energy shifts by up to 0.5 eV and that GW can frequently shift DFT eigenvalues of surface and adsorbate states by approximately 0.5-1 eV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"volume\":\"21 9\",\"pages\":\"4718-4729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01276\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用高保真度、低成本从头算方法对复杂材料进行建模是量子化学软件包的基本目标。GW近似和随机相位近似(RPA)在多体微扰方法中使用相同的物理特性提供了电子结构和总能量的统一描述,比广义梯度密度泛函理论(DFT)方法更准确。然而,GW/RPA的实现一直局限于特定的材料类别或小型化学系统的应用。静态子空间近似允许降低全频率GW/RPA计算的成本,并且之前已经完全用于GW计算的基准测试。在这里,我们描述了我们在研究电催化剂的全频率GW和RPA计算中包括电子轨道部分占据的方法。我们对RPA总能量计算进行了基准测试,在不同的材料测试套件中使用子空间近似来计算各种计算参数。基准测试量化了在无限屏蔽截止点表示静态极化率时不同外推程序的影响,并表明使用20-25 Ryd以上的屏蔽截止点会导致预测RPA总能量的准确性回报降低。此外,对于中等规模的电催化模型,通过用20-30%的静态子空间基表示静态极化率来计算RPA总能量,使用的计算资源减少了2-3倍,RPA吸附能计算误差约为0.01 eV或更好。最后,我们表明,对于这些电化学模型,RPA可以使DFT吸附能位移高达0.5 eV,而GW可以频繁地使表面和吸附态的DFT特征值位移约0.5-1 eV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Static Subspace Approximation for Random Phase Approximation Correlation Energies: Applications to Materials for Catalysis and Electrochemistry.

Modeling complex materials using high-fidelity, ab initio methods at low cost is a fundamental goal for quantum chemical software packages. The GW approximation and random phase approximation (RPA) provide a unified description of both electronic structure and total energies using the same physics in a many-body perturbative approach that can be more accurate than generalized-gradient density functional theory (DFT) methods. However, GW/RPA implementations have historically been limited to either specific materials classes or application toward small chemical systems. The static subspace approximation allows for reduced cost full-frequency GW/RPA calculations and has previously been benchmarked thoroughly for GW calculations. Here, we describe our approach to including partial occupations of electronic orbitals in full-frequency GW and RPA calculations for the study of electrocatalysts. We benchmarked RPA total energy calculations using the subspace approximation across a diverse test suite of materials for a variety of computational parameters. The benchmarking quantifies the impact of different extrapolation procedures for representing the static polarizability at infinite screened cutoff, and shows that using screened cutoffs above 20-25 Ryd result in diminishing accuracy returns for predicting RPA total energies. Additionally, for moderately sized electrocatalytic models, 2-3 times fewer computational resources are used to compute RPA total energies by representing the static polarizability with 20-30% of the static subspace basis, with an error of approximately 0.01 eV or better in RPA adsorption energy calculations. Finally, we show that for these electrochemical models RPA can shift DFT adsorption energy shifts by up to 0.5 eV and that GW can frequently shift DFT eigenvalues of surface and adsorbate states by approximately 0.5-1 eV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信