{"title":"心力衰竭患者充血和灌注状态的物理评估。","authors":"Kenichi Kasai, Chisaki Kanehiro, Sakiko Honda, Chieko Sakai, Atsushi Shindo, Kuniyasu Harimoto, Tatsuya Kawasaki","doi":"10.1159/000546111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical profiles based on congestion and perfusion are fundamental to the management of patients with heart failure (HF), but the standard assessment has been underutilized in clinical practice, due in part to its complexity. This study investigated whether congestion and perfusion status by physical examination, such as high jugular venous pressure (JVP) and peripheral cold sensation, would be informative in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study consisted of 257 patients who were admitted for the treatment of HF. A body-to-peripheral temperature gradient and the presence or absence of peripheral cold sensation were assessed before discharge. JVP was considered high if visible pulsation of the internal jugular vein was observed in the seated position at rest or with inspiration, and categorized as wet. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 132 patients (51.3%) were classified as cold on the peripheral sensation, with a higher temperature gradient (9.0 ± 1.8ºC) than patients without peripheral cold sensation (4.8 ± 1.7ºC, p <0.01). On JVP assessment, 54 patients (21.0%) were classified as wet. During a mean follow-up period of 446 ± 280 days, 109 patients experienced a primary outcome event. The presence of peripheral cold sensation and wet condition were associated with a higher incidence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 1.70 and 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 2.52 and 1.04 to 2.52; both p <0.01, respectively). The status of congestion and perfusion based on the standard classification and our simple physical method using peripheral sensation and JVP assessment showed similar trends in the incidence of the primary outcome at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physical assessment of congestion and perfusion status based on the presence or absence of peripheral cold sensation and wet condition by JVP assessment was practical and useful for the risk stratification of patients with HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Assessment of Congestion and Perfusion Status in Heart Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Kenichi Kasai, Chisaki Kanehiro, Sakiko Honda, Chieko Sakai, Atsushi Shindo, Kuniyasu Harimoto, Tatsuya Kawasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical profiles based on congestion and perfusion are fundamental to the management of patients with heart failure (HF), but the standard assessment has been underutilized in clinical practice, due in part to its complexity. This study investigated whether congestion and perfusion status by physical examination, such as high jugular venous pressure (JVP) and peripheral cold sensation, would be informative in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study consisted of 257 patients who were admitted for the treatment of HF. A body-to-peripheral temperature gradient and the presence or absence of peripheral cold sensation were assessed before discharge. JVP was considered high if visible pulsation of the internal jugular vein was observed in the seated position at rest or with inspiration, and categorized as wet. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 132 patients (51.3%) were classified as cold on the peripheral sensation, with a higher temperature gradient (9.0 ± 1.8ºC) than patients without peripheral cold sensation (4.8 ± 1.7ºC, p <0.01). On JVP assessment, 54 patients (21.0%) were classified as wet. During a mean follow-up period of 446 ± 280 days, 109 patients experienced a primary outcome event. The presence of peripheral cold sensation and wet condition were associated with a higher incidence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 1.70 and 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 2.52 and 1.04 to 2.52; both p <0.01, respectively). The status of congestion and perfusion based on the standard classification and our simple physical method using peripheral sensation and JVP assessment showed similar trends in the incidence of the primary outcome at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physical assessment of congestion and perfusion status based on the presence or absence of peripheral cold sensation and wet condition by JVP assessment was practical and useful for the risk stratification of patients with HF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physical Assessment of Congestion and Perfusion Status in Heart Failure.
Background: Clinical profiles based on congestion and perfusion are fundamental to the management of patients with heart failure (HF), but the standard assessment has been underutilized in clinical practice, due in part to its complexity. This study investigated whether congestion and perfusion status by physical examination, such as high jugular venous pressure (JVP) and peripheral cold sensation, would be informative in this context.
Methods: This prospective study consisted of 257 patients who were admitted for the treatment of HF. A body-to-peripheral temperature gradient and the presence or absence of peripheral cold sensation were assessed before discharge. JVP was considered high if visible pulsation of the internal jugular vein was observed in the seated position at rest or with inspiration, and categorized as wet. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening HF.
Results: A total of 132 patients (51.3%) were classified as cold on the peripheral sensation, with a higher temperature gradient (9.0 ± 1.8ºC) than patients without peripheral cold sensation (4.8 ± 1.7ºC, p <0.01). On JVP assessment, 54 patients (21.0%) were classified as wet. During a mean follow-up period of 446 ± 280 days, 109 patients experienced a primary outcome event. The presence of peripheral cold sensation and wet condition were associated with a higher incidence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 1.70 and 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 2.52 and 1.04 to 2.52; both p <0.01, respectively). The status of congestion and perfusion based on the standard classification and our simple physical method using peripheral sensation and JVP assessment showed similar trends in the incidence of the primary outcome at one year.
Conclusions: Physical assessment of congestion and perfusion status based on the presence or absence of peripheral cold sensation and wet condition by JVP assessment was practical and useful for the risk stratification of patients with HF.
期刊介绍:
''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.