儿童机会指数与儿童败血症识别和治疗之间的关系:一项大型质量改进协作:回顾性队列研究。

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lori Rutman, Troy Richardson, Jeffery Auletta, Fran Balamuth, Amber Chambers, Julie Fitzgerald, Javier Gelvez, Karen A Genzel, Amy Grant, Vishal Gunnala, Hana Hakim, Leslie Hueschen, Sarah Kandi, Gitte Larsen, Justin Lockwood, Kate Lucey, Elizabeth Mack, Kate Madden, Matthew Niedner, Raina Paul, Anireddy Reddy, Ruth Riggs, Johanna Rosen, Melissa Schafer, Halden Scott, Jennifer Wilkes, Matthew A Eisenberg
{"title":"儿童机会指数与儿童败血症识别和治疗之间的关系:一项大型质量改进协作:回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Lori Rutman, Troy Richardson, Jeffery Auletta, Fran Balamuth, Amber Chambers, Julie Fitzgerald, Javier Gelvez, Karen A Genzel, Amy Grant, Vishal Gunnala, Hana Hakim, Leslie Hueschen, Sarah Kandi, Gitte Larsen, Justin Lockwood, Kate Lucey, Elizabeth Mack, Kate Madden, Matthew Niedner, Raina Paul, Anireddy Reddy, Ruth Riggs, Johanna Rosen, Melissa Schafer, Halden Scott, Jennifer Wilkes, Matthew A Eisenberg","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Child Opportunity Index (COI) is a multidimensional measure of US neighbourhood-level conditions needed for healthy development. COI is associated with healthcare delivery and outcomes. Formal quality improvement (QI) may influence the relationship between COI, quality of care and outcomes in children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between COI and paediatric sepsis care delivery and outcomes and determine if baseline disparities in care change over time among hospitals in the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) collaborative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of IPSO patients probabilistically linked to the Pediatric Health Information System database from 2017 to 2021. Primary exposure was COI. We estimated differences in the proportions of patients in each COI quintile identified via standardised sepsis recognition protocols (screening tool, huddle documentation and/or order set use) and who received a bundle of recommended care (standardised sepsis recognition, plus bolus <1 hour and antibiotic <3 hours). We further assessed the timeliness of each bundle component and mortality. We evaluated changes in standardised sepsis recognition over time using generalised linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>31 260 sepsis cases from 24 hospitals were included. Cross-sectional analysis over the entire study period found patients in the Very High COI quintile were most likely to be identified via standardised recognition protocols and receive IPSO's recommended care bundle (67.7% and 46%, respectively). Over time, standardised sepsis recognition improved for all; the greatest improvements were among inpatients in the Very Low COI quintile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities exist in paediatric sepsis care delivery by COI. Over the course of the IPSO collaborative, care improved most for children in the lowest COI quintile. QI collaboratives focused on standardisation and shared learning may reduce disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between Child Opportunity Index and paediatric sepsis recognition and treatment in a large quality improvement collaborative: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Lori Rutman, Troy Richardson, Jeffery Auletta, Fran Balamuth, Amber Chambers, Julie Fitzgerald, Javier Gelvez, Karen A Genzel, Amy Grant, Vishal Gunnala, Hana Hakim, Leslie Hueschen, Sarah Kandi, Gitte Larsen, Justin Lockwood, Kate Lucey, Elizabeth Mack, Kate Madden, Matthew Niedner, Raina Paul, Anireddy Reddy, Ruth Riggs, Johanna Rosen, Melissa Schafer, Halden Scott, Jennifer Wilkes, Matthew A Eisenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Child Opportunity Index (COI) is a multidimensional measure of US neighbourhood-level conditions needed for healthy development. COI is associated with healthcare delivery and outcomes. Formal quality improvement (QI) may influence the relationship between COI, quality of care and outcomes in children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between COI and paediatric sepsis care delivery and outcomes and determine if baseline disparities in care change over time among hospitals in the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) collaborative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of IPSO patients probabilistically linked to the Pediatric Health Information System database from 2017 to 2021. Primary exposure was COI. We estimated differences in the proportions of patients in each COI quintile identified via standardised sepsis recognition protocols (screening tool, huddle documentation and/or order set use) and who received a bundle of recommended care (standardised sepsis recognition, plus bolus <1 hour and antibiotic <3 hours). We further assessed the timeliness of each bundle component and mortality. We evaluated changes in standardised sepsis recognition over time using generalised linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>31 260 sepsis cases from 24 hospitals were included. Cross-sectional analysis over the entire study period found patients in the Very High COI quintile were most likely to be identified via standardised recognition protocols and receive IPSO's recommended care bundle (67.7% and 46%, respectively). Over time, standardised sepsis recognition improved for all; the greatest improvements were among inpatients in the Very Low COI quintile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities exist in paediatric sepsis care delivery by COI. Over the course of the IPSO collaborative, care improved most for children in the lowest COI quintile. QI collaboratives focused on standardisation and shared learning may reduce disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017844\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017844","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童机会指数(COI)是美国社区健康发展所需条件的多维度量。COI与医疗保健服务和结果相关。形式质量改善(QI)可能影响儿童COI、护理质量和结局之间的关系。目的:评估COI与儿科败血症护理交付和结果之间的关系,并确定在改善儿科败血症结局(IPSO)合作中,医院之间的护理基线差异是否随时间而变化。方法:回顾性队列研究2017年至2021年与儿科健康信息系统数据库概率关联的IPSO患者。主要暴露是COI。我们估计了通过标准化败血症识别方案(筛查工具、汇总文件和/或命令集使用)和接受一组推荐护理(标准化败血症识别加丸)确定的每个COI五分位数患者比例的差异。结果:包括来自24家医院的31260例败血症病例。整个研究期间的横断面分析发现,COI非常高的五分位数患者最有可能通过标准化识别协议进行识别,并接受IPSO推荐的护理包(分别为67.7%和46%)。随着时间的推移,所有人的标准化败血症识别都得到了改善;在非常低COI五分位数的住院患者中,改善最大。结论:COI在儿科败血症护理中存在差异。在IPSO合作的过程中,COI最低的五分之一儿童的护理改善最多。注重标准化和共享学习的QI协作可以减少差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between Child Opportunity Index and paediatric sepsis recognition and treatment in a large quality improvement collaborative: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: The Child Opportunity Index (COI) is a multidimensional measure of US neighbourhood-level conditions needed for healthy development. COI is associated with healthcare delivery and outcomes. Formal quality improvement (QI) may influence the relationship between COI, quality of care and outcomes in children.

Objective: To assess the association between COI and paediatric sepsis care delivery and outcomes and determine if baseline disparities in care change over time among hospitals in the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) collaborative.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of IPSO patients probabilistically linked to the Pediatric Health Information System database from 2017 to 2021. Primary exposure was COI. We estimated differences in the proportions of patients in each COI quintile identified via standardised sepsis recognition protocols (screening tool, huddle documentation and/or order set use) and who received a bundle of recommended care (standardised sepsis recognition, plus bolus <1 hour and antibiotic <3 hours). We further assessed the timeliness of each bundle component and mortality. We evaluated changes in standardised sepsis recognition over time using generalised linear models.

Results: 31 260 sepsis cases from 24 hospitals were included. Cross-sectional analysis over the entire study period found patients in the Very High COI quintile were most likely to be identified via standardised recognition protocols and receive IPSO's recommended care bundle (67.7% and 46%, respectively). Over time, standardised sepsis recognition improved for all; the greatest improvements were among inpatients in the Very Low COI quintile.

Conclusion: Disparities exist in paediatric sepsis care delivery by COI. Over the course of the IPSO collaborative, care improved most for children in the lowest COI quintile. QI collaboratives focused on standardisation and shared learning may reduce disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信