{"title":"软骨内成骨移植骨缺损再生效果的定量评价:动物实验分析。","authors":"Yihua Shi, Ranning Zhuo, Weichun Guo, Yubo Shi","doi":"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The regeneration of bone defects through bone grafts primarily depends on two strategies: intramembrane ossification (IO) and endochondral ossification (EO). Traditional bone tissue engineering has focused on mimicking the IO process to stimulate the formation of a bone-like matrix. However, repair strategies based on IO often result in excessive deposition of the matrix on the graft surface, hindering bone tissue regeneration. In recent years, researchers have increasingly focused on investigating the reparative potential of EO-based grafts for bone defects, such as microspheres, pellets, and hydrogel. However, the effectiveness of EO-based grafts on bone defects has not yet been quantitatively evaluated. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous studies to quantitatively assess the bone regenerative potential of EO-based grafts. The results revealed that EO-based grafts showed favorable ability for bone regeneration. However, there was no significant difference in bone regeneration between EO-based grafts that utilized chondrogenic differentiation or hypertrophic differentiation. Additionally, the results demonstrated low quality in the experimental methods and the reporting of animal studies as well as a low quality of evidence provided by the included studies. Based on this, we propose three suggestions to enhance the quality of experimental methods and reporting in animal experiments. Furthermore, it is essential to conduct more evidence-based research to establish reliable evidence for the clinical application of EO-based grafts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8,"journal":{"name":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","volume":"11 5","pages":"2481-2491"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Endochondral Ossification-Based Grafts in Bone Defect Regeneration: An Analysis of Animal Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Yihua Shi, Ranning Zhuo, Weichun Guo, Yubo Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The regeneration of bone defects through bone grafts primarily depends on two strategies: intramembrane ossification (IO) and endochondral ossification (EO). Traditional bone tissue engineering has focused on mimicking the IO process to stimulate the formation of a bone-like matrix. However, repair strategies based on IO often result in excessive deposition of the matrix on the graft surface, hindering bone tissue regeneration. In recent years, researchers have increasingly focused on investigating the reparative potential of EO-based grafts for bone defects, such as microspheres, pellets, and hydrogel. However, the effectiveness of EO-based grafts on bone defects has not yet been quantitatively evaluated. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous studies to quantitatively assess the bone regenerative potential of EO-based grafts. The results revealed that EO-based grafts showed favorable ability for bone regeneration. However, there was no significant difference in bone regeneration between EO-based grafts that utilized chondrogenic differentiation or hypertrophic differentiation. Additionally, the results demonstrated low quality in the experimental methods and the reporting of animal studies as well as a low quality of evidence provided by the included studies. Based on this, we propose three suggestions to enhance the quality of experimental methods and reporting in animal experiments. Furthermore, it is essential to conduct more evidence-based research to establish reliable evidence for the clinical application of EO-based grafts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"2481-2491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01895\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Quantitative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Endochondral Ossification-Based Grafts in Bone Defect Regeneration: An Analysis of Animal Studies.
The regeneration of bone defects through bone grafts primarily depends on two strategies: intramembrane ossification (IO) and endochondral ossification (EO). Traditional bone tissue engineering has focused on mimicking the IO process to stimulate the formation of a bone-like matrix. However, repair strategies based on IO often result in excessive deposition of the matrix on the graft surface, hindering bone tissue regeneration. In recent years, researchers have increasingly focused on investigating the reparative potential of EO-based grafts for bone defects, such as microspheres, pellets, and hydrogel. However, the effectiveness of EO-based grafts on bone defects has not yet been quantitatively evaluated. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous studies to quantitatively assess the bone regenerative potential of EO-based grafts. The results revealed that EO-based grafts showed favorable ability for bone regeneration. However, there was no significant difference in bone regeneration between EO-based grafts that utilized chondrogenic differentiation or hypertrophic differentiation. Additionally, the results demonstrated low quality in the experimental methods and the reporting of animal studies as well as a low quality of evidence provided by the included studies. Based on this, we propose three suggestions to enhance the quality of experimental methods and reporting in animal experiments. Furthermore, it is essential to conduct more evidence-based research to establish reliable evidence for the clinical application of EO-based grafts.
期刊介绍:
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering is the leading journal in the field of biomaterials, serving as an international forum for publishing cutting-edge research and innovative ideas on a broad range of topics:
Applications and Health – implantable tissues and devices, prosthesis, health risks, toxicology
Bio-interactions and Bio-compatibility – material-biology interactions, chemical/morphological/structural communication, mechanobiology, signaling and biological responses, immuno-engineering, calcification, coatings, corrosion and degradation of biomaterials and devices, biophysical regulation of cell functions
Characterization, Synthesis, and Modification – new biomaterials, bioinspired and biomimetic approaches to biomaterials, exploiting structural hierarchy and architectural control, combinatorial strategies for biomaterials discovery, genetic biomaterials design, synthetic biology, new composite systems, bionics, polymer synthesis
Controlled Release and Delivery Systems – biomaterial-based drug and gene delivery, bio-responsive delivery of regulatory molecules, pharmaceutical engineering
Healthcare Advances – clinical translation, regulatory issues, patient safety, emerging trends
Imaging and Diagnostics – imaging agents and probes, theranostics, biosensors, monitoring
Manufacturing and Technology – 3D printing, inks, organ-on-a-chip, bioreactor/perfusion systems, microdevices, BioMEMS, optics and electronics interfaces with biomaterials, systems integration
Modeling and Informatics Tools – scaling methods to guide biomaterial design, predictive algorithms for structure-function, biomechanics, integrating bioinformatics with biomaterials discovery, metabolomics in the context of biomaterials
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine – basic and applied studies, cell therapies, scaffolds, vascularization, bioartificial organs, transplantation and functionality, cellular agriculture