固定距离记录和足长对正常成人腓肠背神经感觉神经动作电位的影响。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.4103/aian.aian_202_24
Shaikh Alpa Nasrin Samuel, Manjusha Shinde, Charu Bansal, Harshita Mangla, R Aruna, Tandra Ghosh
{"title":"固定距离记录和足长对正常成人腓肠背神经感觉神经动作电位的影响。","authors":"Shaikh Alpa Nasrin Samuel, Manjusha Shinde, Charu Bansal, Harshita Mangla, R Aruna, Tandra Ghosh","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_202_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Due to its distal location in the lower limb, the dorsal sural sensory nerve is pivotal in diagnosing early and subclinical peripheral neuropathy. This study aimed to establish reference data for latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity at fixed varying distances (80, 100, and 120 mm) between active and stimulating electrodes, while examining the impact of foot length on sensory nerve action potential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective nerve conduction study (NCS) included 48 healthy participants aged 19-54 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The upper and lower limits for latency, amplitude, and conduction velocities at 80 mm distance from the stimulating electrode were 3.1 and 1.01 ms, 36.8 and 1.45 μV, and 58.87 and 20.32 m/s, respectively. Similarly, the upper and lower limits for latency, amplitude, and conduction velocities at 100 mm distance from the stimulating electrode were 3.33 and 1.63 ms, 32.81 and 1.355 μV, and 55.24 and 24.75 m/s, respectively. The upper and lower limits for latencies and conduction velocities at 120 mm distance from the stimulating electrode were 4.25 and 1.76 ms and 59.43 and 21.77 m/s, respectively. The highest and lowest recorded amplitudes at 120 mm distance were 34.47 and 2.2 μV, respectively. Notably, univariate analysis findings were significant for latency (t = 2.86, P = 0.006) and conduction velocity (t = -2.13, P = 0.03) in relation to foot length when the distance between electrodes was 80 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides reference normative data for the East Indian population, augmenting the understanding of NCS in diagnosing peripheral neuropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":"28 2","pages":"247-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Fixed Distance Recording and Foot Length on Sensory Nerve Action Potential of Dorsal Sural Nerve in Normal Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Shaikh Alpa Nasrin Samuel, Manjusha Shinde, Charu Bansal, Harshita Mangla, R Aruna, Tandra Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aian.aian_202_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Due to its distal location in the lower limb, the dorsal sural sensory nerve is pivotal in diagnosing early and subclinical peripheral neuropathy. This study aimed to establish reference data for latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity at fixed varying distances (80, 100, and 120 mm) between active and stimulating electrodes, while examining the impact of foot length on sensory nerve action potential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective nerve conduction study (NCS) included 48 healthy participants aged 19-54 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The upper and lower limits for latency, amplitude, and conduction velocities at 80 mm distance from the stimulating electrode were 3.1 and 1.01 ms, 36.8 and 1.45 μV, and 58.87 and 20.32 m/s, respectively. Similarly, the upper and lower limits for latency, amplitude, and conduction velocities at 100 mm distance from the stimulating electrode were 3.33 and 1.63 ms, 32.81 and 1.355 μV, and 55.24 and 24.75 m/s, respectively. The upper and lower limits for latencies and conduction velocities at 120 mm distance from the stimulating electrode were 4.25 and 1.76 ms and 59.43 and 21.77 m/s, respectively. The highest and lowest recorded amplitudes at 120 mm distance were 34.47 and 2.2 μV, respectively. Notably, univariate analysis findings were significant for latency (t = 2.86, P = 0.006) and conduction velocity (t = -2.13, P = 0.03) in relation to foot length when the distance between electrodes was 80 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides reference normative data for the East Indian population, augmenting the understanding of NCS in diagnosing peripheral neuropathy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"247-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049201/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_202_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_202_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:由于腓肠背感觉神经位于下肢远端,在诊断早期和亚临床周围神经病变中起关键作用。本研究旨在建立在活动电极和刺激电极之间固定的不同距离(80、100和120 mm)下的潜伏期、振幅和传导速度的参考数据,同时研究足长对感觉神经动作电位的影响。方法:一项前瞻性神经传导研究(NCS)包括48名年龄19-54岁的健康参与者。结果:在距离刺激电极80 mm处的潜伏期、振幅和传导速度的上下限分别为3.1和1.01 ms, 36.8和1.45 μV, 58.87和20.32 m/s。同样,在距离刺激电极100 mm处,潜伏期、振幅和传导速度的上下限分别为3.33和1.63 ms, 32.81和1.355 μV, 55.24和24.75 m/s。在距离刺激电极120 mm处,潜伏期和传导速度的上下限分别为4.25和1.76 ms, 59.43和21.77 m/s。在120 mm处记录到的最大振幅为34.47 μV,最小振幅为2.2 μV。值得注意的是,当电极之间的距离为80 mm时,单变量分析结果显示潜伏期(t = 2.86, P = 0.006)和传导速度(t = -2.13, P = 0.03)与脚长有关。结论:本研究为东印度人群提供了参考规范数据,增加了对NCS诊断周围神经病变的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Fixed Distance Recording and Foot Length on Sensory Nerve Action Potential of Dorsal Sural Nerve in Normal Adults.

Background and objectives: Due to its distal location in the lower limb, the dorsal sural sensory nerve is pivotal in diagnosing early and subclinical peripheral neuropathy. This study aimed to establish reference data for latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity at fixed varying distances (80, 100, and 120 mm) between active and stimulating electrodes, while examining the impact of foot length on sensory nerve action potential.

Methods: A prospective nerve conduction study (NCS) included 48 healthy participants aged 19-54 years.

Results: The upper and lower limits for latency, amplitude, and conduction velocities at 80 mm distance from the stimulating electrode were 3.1 and 1.01 ms, 36.8 and 1.45 μV, and 58.87 and 20.32 m/s, respectively. Similarly, the upper and lower limits for latency, amplitude, and conduction velocities at 100 mm distance from the stimulating electrode were 3.33 and 1.63 ms, 32.81 and 1.355 μV, and 55.24 and 24.75 m/s, respectively. The upper and lower limits for latencies and conduction velocities at 120 mm distance from the stimulating electrode were 4.25 and 1.76 ms and 59.43 and 21.77 m/s, respectively. The highest and lowest recorded amplitudes at 120 mm distance were 34.47 and 2.2 μV, respectively. Notably, univariate analysis findings were significant for latency (t = 2.86, P = 0.006) and conduction velocity (t = -2.13, P = 0.03) in relation to foot length when the distance between electrodes was 80 mm.

Conclusion: This study provides reference normative data for the East Indian population, augmenting the understanding of NCS in diagnosing peripheral neuropathy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Nervous System Diseases-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
293
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信