胸骨柄气管指数与胸入口气管指数和近肋气管评分对牛头犬气管直径进行3个水平的影像学评价。

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ayman A Mostafa, Clifford R Berry
{"title":"胸骨柄气管指数与胸入口气管指数和近肋气管评分对牛头犬气管直径进行3个水平的影像学评价。","authors":"Ayman A Mostafa, Clifford R Berry","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the manubrium tracheal index (M-TI) at 3 levels and the correlation between M-TI and other conventional techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records and thoracic radiographs of healthy bulldogs were investigated. Tracheal luminal diameter (TLD) was measured at the caudal cervical, thoracic inlet, and intrathoracic tracheal regions on right lateral thoracic view. The absolute and average TLDs were standardized by the manubrium length (ML), thoracic inlet distance (Ti-D), and proximal third rib width to calculate M-TI, thoracic inlet tracheal index (Ti-TI), and proximal rib3 tracheal score (PR3-TS), respectively. Correlations between averaged tracheal diameter and each of ML, Ti-D, and proximal third rib width and between M-TI and each of Ti-TI and PR3-TS were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>100 healthy French (n = 34), English (n = 33), and American (n = 33) Bulldogs met the inclusion criteria. The narrowest tracheal diameter was identified at the thoracic inlet, which was significantly narrower than both the caudal cervical and intrathoracic tracheal regions. There was no significant difference between the caudal cervical and intrathoracic tracheal regions. Strong, positive, linear correlations were identified between TLD and each normalizing parameter (ie, ML, Ti-D, and PR3-TS). Weak-to-moderate correlations were identified between the 3 procedures (ie, M-TI, Ti-TI, and PR3-TS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>M-TI could be an alternative to Ti-TI and PR3-TS for monitoring TLD in bulldogs. Therefore, future screening for tracheal hypoplasia is recommended using M-TI.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Bulldogs with M-TI < 0.29 at the thoracic inlet trachea and < 0.33 at the caudal cervical and intrathoracic trachea (average M-TI < 0.32) may have tracheal hypoplasia. However, further assessments of diseased bulldogs and the repeatability of measurements are still warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manubrium tracheal index versus thoracic inlet tracheal index and proximal rib3 tracheal score to radiographically assess bulldogs' tracheal diameter at 3 levels.\",\"authors\":\"Ayman A Mostafa, Clifford R Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the manubrium tracheal index (M-TI) at 3 levels and the correlation between M-TI and other conventional techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records and thoracic radiographs of healthy bulldogs were investigated. Tracheal luminal diameter (TLD) was measured at the caudal cervical, thoracic inlet, and intrathoracic tracheal regions on right lateral thoracic view. The absolute and average TLDs were standardized by the manubrium length (ML), thoracic inlet distance (Ti-D), and proximal third rib width to calculate M-TI, thoracic inlet tracheal index (Ti-TI), and proximal rib3 tracheal score (PR3-TS), respectively. Correlations between averaged tracheal diameter and each of ML, Ti-D, and proximal third rib width and between M-TI and each of Ti-TI and PR3-TS were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>100 healthy French (n = 34), English (n = 33), and American (n = 33) Bulldogs met the inclusion criteria. The narrowest tracheal diameter was identified at the thoracic inlet, which was significantly narrower than both the caudal cervical and intrathoracic tracheal regions. There was no significant difference between the caudal cervical and intrathoracic tracheal regions. Strong, positive, linear correlations were identified between TLD and each normalizing parameter (ie, ML, Ti-D, and PR3-TS). Weak-to-moderate correlations were identified between the 3 procedures (ie, M-TI, Ti-TI, and PR3-TS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>M-TI could be an alternative to Ti-TI and PR3-TS for monitoring TLD in bulldogs. Therefore, future screening for tracheal hypoplasia is recommended using M-TI.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Bulldogs with M-TI < 0.29 at the thoracic inlet trachea and < 0.33 at the caudal cervical and intrathoracic trachea (average M-TI < 0.32) may have tracheal hypoplasia. However, further assessments of diseased bulldogs and the repeatability of measurements are still warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0400\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价3个水平的柄状气管指数(M-TI)及其与其他常规技术的相关性。方法:对健康斗牛犬的病历和胸片进行调查。气管管腔直径(TLD)在右侧胸腔镜下测量颈侧、胸入口和胸内气管区域。以胸柄长度(ML)、胸廓入口距离(Ti-D)和近端第三肋宽度对绝对TLDs和平均TLDs进行标准化,分别计算M-TI、胸廓入口气管指数(Ti-TI)和近端肋骨气管评分(PR3-TS)。评估平均气管直径与ML、Ti-D和近端第三肋骨宽度的相关性,以及M-TI与Ti-TI和PR3-TS的相关性。结果:100只健康的法国(n = 34)、英国(n = 33)和美国(n = 33)斗牛犬符合纳入标准。最窄的气管直径被确定在胸入口,这明显比尾端颈和胸内气管区域窄。尾端颈椎和胸内气管区域间无显著差异。TLD与每个归一化参数(即ML、Ti-D和PR3-TS)之间存在强烈的正线性相关性。3种程序(即M-TI、Ti-TI和PR3-TS)之间存在弱至中度相关性。结论:M-TI可替代Ti-TI和PR3-TS监测牛头犬TLD。因此,建议将来使用M-TI筛查气管发育不全。临床相关性:胸入口气管M-TI < 0.29,尾侧颈段和胸内气管M-TI < 0.33(平均M-TI < 0.32)的斗牛犬可能存在气管发育不全。然而,对患病斗牛犬的进一步评估和测量的可重复性仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manubrium tracheal index versus thoracic inlet tracheal index and proximal rib3 tracheal score to radiographically assess bulldogs' tracheal diameter at 3 levels.

Objective: To evaluate the manubrium tracheal index (M-TI) at 3 levels and the correlation between M-TI and other conventional techniques.

Methods: Medical records and thoracic radiographs of healthy bulldogs were investigated. Tracheal luminal diameter (TLD) was measured at the caudal cervical, thoracic inlet, and intrathoracic tracheal regions on right lateral thoracic view. The absolute and average TLDs were standardized by the manubrium length (ML), thoracic inlet distance (Ti-D), and proximal third rib width to calculate M-TI, thoracic inlet tracheal index (Ti-TI), and proximal rib3 tracheal score (PR3-TS), respectively. Correlations between averaged tracheal diameter and each of ML, Ti-D, and proximal third rib width and between M-TI and each of Ti-TI and PR3-TS were evaluated.

Results: 100 healthy French (n = 34), English (n = 33), and American (n = 33) Bulldogs met the inclusion criteria. The narrowest tracheal diameter was identified at the thoracic inlet, which was significantly narrower than both the caudal cervical and intrathoracic tracheal regions. There was no significant difference between the caudal cervical and intrathoracic tracheal regions. Strong, positive, linear correlations were identified between TLD and each normalizing parameter (ie, ML, Ti-D, and PR3-TS). Weak-to-moderate correlations were identified between the 3 procedures (ie, M-TI, Ti-TI, and PR3-TS).

Conclusions: M-TI could be an alternative to Ti-TI and PR3-TS for monitoring TLD in bulldogs. Therefore, future screening for tracheal hypoplasia is recommended using M-TI.

Clinical relevance: Bulldogs with M-TI < 0.29 at the thoracic inlet trachea and < 0.33 at the caudal cervical and intrathoracic trachea (average M-TI < 0.32) may have tracheal hypoplasia. However, further assessments of diseased bulldogs and the repeatability of measurements are still warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信