定量MRCP对原发性硬化性胆管炎特异性生物标志物的准确性、可重复性、再现性和参考范围

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mukesh Harisinghani, Tom Davis, George Ralli, Carlos Ferreira, Bruno Paun, Andrea Borghetto, Andrea Dennis, Kartik Jhaveri, Filippo Del Grande, Sarah Finnegan, Michele Pansini
{"title":"定量MRCP对原发性硬化性胆管炎特异性生物标志物的准确性、可重复性、再现性和参考范围","authors":"Mukesh Harisinghani, Tom Davis, George Ralli, Carlos Ferreira, Bruno Paun, Andrea Borghetto, Andrea Dennis, Kartik Jhaveri, Filippo Del Grande, Sarah Finnegan, Michele Pansini","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04941-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics generated from MRCP + software, designed for assessing biliary tree health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Metric accuracy was assessed using a 3D-printed phantom containing 20 tubes with sinusoidally-varying diameters, simulating strictures and dilatations along ducts. Data from 80 participants (60 healthy volunteers and 20 with liver disease) was analysed in total. Repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative metrics were assessed on Siemens, GE and Philips scanners at both 1.5T and 3T. All subjects were scanned on a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner which acted as the reference scanner. A subset of these participants also underwent scanning on the remaining scanners. Data from healthy volunteers was used to estimate the natural range of measured values (reference ranges). The reproducibility coefficient (RC) of 7 commonly reported quantitative metrics were compared between healthy controls and published values in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The phantom analysis confirmed measurement accuracy with absolute bias of 0.0-0.1 for strictures and 0.1-0.2 for dilatations across all scanners (95% limits of agreement within ± 1.0). In vivo, RCs for the quantitative MRCP-derived metrics across the scanners ranged from: 12.4-25.4 for total number of ducts; 4.9-7.9 for number of dilatations; 3.3-6.5 for number of strictures; 4.6-9.8 mm for total length of dilatations; 26.5-51.7 mm for total length of strictures; and 4.4-6.8 for number of ducts with a stricture or dilatation. Repeatability on the same scanner was generally better than comparisons across scanners. Six metrics demonstrated sufficient cross-scanner reproducibility to distinguish healthy volunteers from PSC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The precision of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics were sufficient to differentiate PSC and healthy subjects and should be well suited for multi-centre trials and assessment of biliary tree health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility and reference ranges of primary sclerosing cholangitis specific biomarkers from quantitative MRCP.\",\"authors\":\"Mukesh Harisinghani, Tom Davis, George Ralli, Carlos Ferreira, Bruno Paun, Andrea Borghetto, Andrea Dennis, Kartik Jhaveri, Filippo Del Grande, Sarah Finnegan, Michele Pansini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04941-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics generated from MRCP + software, designed for assessing biliary tree health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Metric accuracy was assessed using a 3D-printed phantom containing 20 tubes with sinusoidally-varying diameters, simulating strictures and dilatations along ducts. Data from 80 participants (60 healthy volunteers and 20 with liver disease) was analysed in total. Repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative metrics were assessed on Siemens, GE and Philips scanners at both 1.5T and 3T. All subjects were scanned on a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner which acted as the reference scanner. A subset of these participants also underwent scanning on the remaining scanners. Data from healthy volunteers was used to estimate the natural range of measured values (reference ranges). The reproducibility coefficient (RC) of 7 commonly reported quantitative metrics were compared between healthy controls and published values in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The phantom analysis confirmed measurement accuracy with absolute bias of 0.0-0.1 for strictures and 0.1-0.2 for dilatations across all scanners (95% limits of agreement within ± 1.0). In vivo, RCs for the quantitative MRCP-derived metrics across the scanners ranged from: 12.4-25.4 for total number of ducts; 4.9-7.9 for number of dilatations; 3.3-6.5 for number of strictures; 4.6-9.8 mm for total length of dilatations; 26.5-51.7 mm for total length of strictures; and 4.4-6.8 for number of ducts with a stricture or dilatation. Repeatability on the same scanner was generally better than comparisons across scanners. Six metrics demonstrated sufficient cross-scanner reproducibility to distinguish healthy volunteers from PSC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The precision of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics were sufficient to differentiate PSC and healthy subjects and should be well suited for multi-centre trials and assessment of biliary tree health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04941-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04941-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估MRCP +软件生成的定量MRCP衍生指标的可重复性和再现性,用于评估胆道树的健康状况。方法:使用包含20个直径呈正弦变化的管道的3d打印模型来评估测量精度,模拟管道的狭窄和扩张。总共分析了80名参与者(60名健康志愿者和20名患有肝病的志愿者)的数据。定量指标的重复性和再现性在1.5T和3T的西门子、GE和飞利浦扫描仪上进行评估。所有受试者在Siemens Prisma 3T扫描仪上进行扫描,该扫描仪作为参考扫描仪。这些参与者的一部分也在剩余的扫描仪上进行了扫描。来自健康志愿者的数据被用来估计测量值的自然范围(参考范围)。在原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)患者中,比较了7种常用定量指标的可重复性系数(RC)。结果:幻影分析证实了所有扫描仪的测量精度,狭窄的绝对偏差为0.0-0.1,扩张的绝对偏差为0.1-0.2(95%的一致性限制在±1.0以内)。在体内,mrcp衍生的定量指标在扫描仪上的RCs范围为:管道总数为12.4-25.4;膨胀次数为4.9-7.9;3.3-6.5为结构数;膨胀总长度为4.6-9.8 mm;狭窄总长度26.5-51.7 mm;有狭窄或扩张的导管数为4.4-6.8。同一扫描仪上的可重复性通常比不同扫描仪之间的比较要好。6个指标显示了足够的交叉扫描再现性,以区分健康志愿者和PSC患者。结论:mrcp衍生的定量指标的精度足以区分PSC和健康受试者,并适用于多中心试验和胆道健康评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility and reference ranges of primary sclerosing cholangitis specific biomarkers from quantitative MRCP.

Purpose: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics generated from MRCP + software, designed for assessing biliary tree health.

Methods: Metric accuracy was assessed using a 3D-printed phantom containing 20 tubes with sinusoidally-varying diameters, simulating strictures and dilatations along ducts. Data from 80 participants (60 healthy volunteers and 20 with liver disease) was analysed in total. Repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative metrics were assessed on Siemens, GE and Philips scanners at both 1.5T and 3T. All subjects were scanned on a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner which acted as the reference scanner. A subset of these participants also underwent scanning on the remaining scanners. Data from healthy volunteers was used to estimate the natural range of measured values (reference ranges). The reproducibility coefficient (RC) of 7 commonly reported quantitative metrics were compared between healthy controls and published values in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients.

Results: The phantom analysis confirmed measurement accuracy with absolute bias of 0.0-0.1 for strictures and 0.1-0.2 for dilatations across all scanners (95% limits of agreement within ± 1.0). In vivo, RCs for the quantitative MRCP-derived metrics across the scanners ranged from: 12.4-25.4 for total number of ducts; 4.9-7.9 for number of dilatations; 3.3-6.5 for number of strictures; 4.6-9.8 mm for total length of dilatations; 26.5-51.7 mm for total length of strictures; and 4.4-6.8 for number of ducts with a stricture or dilatation. Repeatability on the same scanner was generally better than comparisons across scanners. Six metrics demonstrated sufficient cross-scanner reproducibility to distinguish healthy volunteers from PSC patients.

Conclusion: The precision of quantitative MRCP-derived metrics were sufficient to differentiate PSC and healthy subjects and should be well suited for multi-centre trials and assessment of biliary tree health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信