专业人士和家庭对共同决策要素的看法:对青少年综合照料中多重持久问题家庭的定性分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Anne Marie Barnhoorn-Bos, Eva A Mulder, Laura A Nooteboom, E H Alet Meurs, Robert R J M Vermeiren
{"title":"专业人士和家庭对共同决策要素的看法:对青少年综合照料中多重持久问题家庭的定性分析。","authors":"Anne Marie Barnhoorn-Bos, Eva A Mulder, Laura A Nooteboom, E H Alet Meurs, Robert R J M Vermeiren","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01443-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shared decision-making (SDM), known to improve client engagement in care and its quality, is crucial to achieve family-tailored care. However, when providing integrated youth care, SDM can be challenged by the complexity of families' problems and the multiple family members and professionals involved. Commonly used SDM models may not adequately address these specific challenges. Therefore, this qualitative study explores families' and professionals' perspectives on essential elements of SDM with families experiencing multiple and enduring problems on different life domains (e.g., mental health, parenting, financial, and social problems). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 parents, 3 youth, and 22 professionals from Specialist Integrated care Teams in four regions of the Netherlands. A framework method - comprising essential elements of SDM - was applied to systematically code the transcripts both deductively and inductively. Our study shows the nine essential elements of SDM require a specific interpretation in the context of integrated youth care, regarding the diversity of participants in decision-making, the complexity of the problems, and SDM as a continuous process of multiple decisions. In addition, families and professionals mentioned three complementary elements: (1) build collaborative relationships, (2) prioritize problems, goals and actions, and (3) interprofessional consultation. Thus, in integrated youth care professionals are recommended to consider SDM as a cyclical process of larger and smaller decisions and take time to build collaborative relationships with families and the care network. Throughout the care process families and professionals balance their mutual roles in decision-making in line with the changing needs and preferences of families.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professionals' and Families' Perspectives on Essential Elements of Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis on Families with Multiple and Enduring Problems in Integrated Youth Care.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Marie Barnhoorn-Bos, Eva A Mulder, Laura A Nooteboom, E H Alet Meurs, Robert R J M Vermeiren\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10488-025-01443-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Shared decision-making (SDM), known to improve client engagement in care and its quality, is crucial to achieve family-tailored care. However, when providing integrated youth care, SDM can be challenged by the complexity of families' problems and the multiple family members and professionals involved. Commonly used SDM models may not adequately address these specific challenges. Therefore, this qualitative study explores families' and professionals' perspectives on essential elements of SDM with families experiencing multiple and enduring problems on different life domains (e.g., mental health, parenting, financial, and social problems). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 parents, 3 youth, and 22 professionals from Specialist Integrated care Teams in four regions of the Netherlands. A framework method - comprising essential elements of SDM - was applied to systematically code the transcripts both deductively and inductively. Our study shows the nine essential elements of SDM require a specific interpretation in the context of integrated youth care, regarding the diversity of participants in decision-making, the complexity of the problems, and SDM as a continuous process of multiple decisions. In addition, families and professionals mentioned three complementary elements: (1) build collaborative relationships, (2) prioritize problems, goals and actions, and (3) interprofessional consultation. Thus, in integrated youth care professionals are recommended to consider SDM as a cyclical process of larger and smaller decisions and take time to build collaborative relationships with families and the care network. Throughout the care process families and professionals balance their mutual roles in decision-making in line with the changing needs and preferences of families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-025-01443-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-025-01443-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,共同决策(SDM)可以提高客户对护理的参与度及其质量,对于实现家庭定制护理至关重要。然而,在提供综合青年护理时,SDM可能会受到家庭问题的复杂性以及涉及的多个家庭成员和专业人员的挑战。常用的SDM模型可能无法充分解决这些特定的挑战。因此,本定性研究探讨了家庭和专业人士对SDM基本要素的看法,这些家庭在不同的生活领域(如心理健康、养育子女、经济和社会问题)经历了多重和持久的问题。对来自荷兰四个地区的18名家长、3名青少年和22名专业人员进行了半结构化访谈。一个框架方法-包括SDM的基本要素-被应用于系统地编码转录本演绎和归纳。我们的研究表明,SDM的九个基本要素需要在综合青年护理的背景下进行具体的解释,考虑到决策参与者的多样性,问题的复杂性,以及SDM作为多个决策的连续过程。此外,家庭和专业人员还提到了三个互补的要素:(1)建立合作关系;(2)优先考虑问题、目标和行动;(3)跨专业咨询。因此,在综合青年护理专业人员被建议考虑SDM作为一个循环过程的较大和较小的决定,并花时间与家庭和护理网络建立合作关系。在整个护理过程中,家庭和专业人员根据家庭不断变化的需求和偏好平衡他们在决策中的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professionals' and Families' Perspectives on Essential Elements of Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis on Families with Multiple and Enduring Problems in Integrated Youth Care.

Shared decision-making (SDM), known to improve client engagement in care and its quality, is crucial to achieve family-tailored care. However, when providing integrated youth care, SDM can be challenged by the complexity of families' problems and the multiple family members and professionals involved. Commonly used SDM models may not adequately address these specific challenges. Therefore, this qualitative study explores families' and professionals' perspectives on essential elements of SDM with families experiencing multiple and enduring problems on different life domains (e.g., mental health, parenting, financial, and social problems). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 parents, 3 youth, and 22 professionals from Specialist Integrated care Teams in four regions of the Netherlands. A framework method - comprising essential elements of SDM - was applied to systematically code the transcripts both deductively and inductively. Our study shows the nine essential elements of SDM require a specific interpretation in the context of integrated youth care, regarding the diversity of participants in decision-making, the complexity of the problems, and SDM as a continuous process of multiple decisions. In addition, families and professionals mentioned three complementary elements: (1) build collaborative relationships, (2) prioritize problems, goals and actions, and (3) interprofessional consultation. Thus, in integrated youth care professionals are recommended to consider SDM as a cyclical process of larger and smaller decisions and take time to build collaborative relationships with families and the care network. Throughout the care process families and professionals balance their mutual roles in decision-making in line with the changing needs and preferences of families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信