不同机器学习方法在Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI预测HCC早期复发中的比较

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Shu Wen Sun, Xun Xu, Qiu Ping Liu, Fei Peng Zhu, Yu Dong Zhang, Xi Sheng Liu
{"title":"不同机器学习方法在Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI预测HCC早期复发中的比较","authors":"Shu Wen Sun, Xun Xu, Qiu Ping Liu, Fei Peng Zhu, Yu Dong Zhang, Xi Sheng Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04932-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop machine learning models that are driven by Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI features for the preoperative prediction of early recurrence in HCC and compare them to the previously proposed ERASL-pre method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study consisted of 311 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection between January 2013 and July 2021. Among them, 131 patients with early recurrence of HCC and 180 patients without early recurrence of HCC. The MR images were independently reviewed by two radiologists. Logistic regression, classification tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machines (SVM), and neural network (Nnet) were the six machine learning algorithms used. The baseline model was ERASL-pre. Different models' discrimination, calibration, and overall performance were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline ERASL-pre obtained AUCs of 0.703 and 0.716, respectively. In comparison to ERASL-pre, the AUCs for logistic regression, random forest, and SVM were higher but not substantially different. XGBoost produced AUCs for Readers 1 and 2 of 0.720 and 0.685, respectively. Nnet achieved marginally lower but not statistically different AUCs in comparison to ERASL-pre, whereas the classification tree achieved the lowest AUCs. The logistic regression model had the optimal overall net benefit across the majority of the range of reasonable threshold probabilities. Good agreement was observed between prediction and observation in the ERASL-pre and the logistic regression model for both readers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The logistic regression model performed better in predicting an early recurrence of HCC with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI. In addition, the model is more sensitive than the baseline ERASL-pre model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different machine learning methods in the prediction of early recurrence in HCC patients with Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Shu Wen Sun, Xun Xu, Qiu Ping Liu, Fei Peng Zhu, Yu Dong Zhang, Xi Sheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04932-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop machine learning models that are driven by Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI features for the preoperative prediction of early recurrence in HCC and compare them to the previously proposed ERASL-pre method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study consisted of 311 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection between January 2013 and July 2021. Among them, 131 patients with early recurrence of HCC and 180 patients without early recurrence of HCC. The MR images were independently reviewed by two radiologists. Logistic regression, classification tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machines (SVM), and neural network (Nnet) were the six machine learning algorithms used. The baseline model was ERASL-pre. Different models' discrimination, calibration, and overall performance were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline ERASL-pre obtained AUCs of 0.703 and 0.716, respectively. In comparison to ERASL-pre, the AUCs for logistic regression, random forest, and SVM were higher but not substantially different. XGBoost produced AUCs for Readers 1 and 2 of 0.720 and 0.685, respectively. Nnet achieved marginally lower but not statistically different AUCs in comparison to ERASL-pre, whereas the classification tree achieved the lowest AUCs. The logistic regression model had the optimal overall net benefit across the majority of the range of reasonable threshold probabilities. Good agreement was observed between prediction and observation in the ERASL-pre and the logistic regression model for both readers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The logistic regression model performed better in predicting an early recurrence of HCC with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI. In addition, the model is more sensitive than the baseline ERASL-pre model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04932-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04932-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发由Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI特征驱动的机器学习模型,用于HCC早期复发的术前预测,并将其与先前提出的erasl预方法进行比较。方法:这项回顾性研究包括311例2013年1月至2021年7月期间连续接受治愈性肝切除术的患者。其中HCC早期复发患者131例,HCC未早期复发患者180例。磁共振图像由两名放射科医生独立审查。逻辑回归、分类树、随机森林、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、支持向量机(SVM)和神经网络(Nnet)是使用的六种机器学习算法。基线模型为ERASL-pre。对不同模型的判别、校准和整体性能进行了评价和比较。结果:基线erasl预获得的auc分别为0.703和0.716。与ERASL-pre相比,逻辑回归、随机森林和支持向量机的auc更高,但差异不大。XGBoost为reader 1和2生成的auc分别为0.720和0.685。与ERASL-pre相比,Nnet的auc略低,但没有统计学差异,而分类树的auc最低。逻辑回归模型在合理阈值概率的大部分范围内具有最佳的总体净效益。在ERASL-pre和逻辑回归模型中,两种读者的预测和观察结果吻合良好。结论:logistic回归模型对Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI预测HCC早期复发有较好的效果。此外,该模型比基线ERASL-pre模型更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of different machine learning methods in the prediction of early recurrence in HCC patients with Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI.

Purpose: To develop machine learning models that are driven by Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI features for the preoperative prediction of early recurrence in HCC and compare them to the previously proposed ERASL-pre method.

Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 311 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection between January 2013 and July 2021. Among them, 131 patients with early recurrence of HCC and 180 patients without early recurrence of HCC. The MR images were independently reviewed by two radiologists. Logistic regression, classification tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machines (SVM), and neural network (Nnet) were the six machine learning algorithms used. The baseline model was ERASL-pre. Different models' discrimination, calibration, and overall performance were evaluated and compared.

Results: The baseline ERASL-pre obtained AUCs of 0.703 and 0.716, respectively. In comparison to ERASL-pre, the AUCs for logistic regression, random forest, and SVM were higher but not substantially different. XGBoost produced AUCs for Readers 1 and 2 of 0.720 and 0.685, respectively. Nnet achieved marginally lower but not statistically different AUCs in comparison to ERASL-pre, whereas the classification tree achieved the lowest AUCs. The logistic regression model had the optimal overall net benefit across the majority of the range of reasonable threshold probabilities. Good agreement was observed between prediction and observation in the ERASL-pre and the logistic regression model for both readers.

Conclusion: The logistic regression model performed better in predicting an early recurrence of HCC with Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI. In addition, the model is more sensitive than the baseline ERASL-pre model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信