手术治疗对老年溃疡性结肠炎相关结直肠癌患者的预后价值:一项日本全国性多中心研究的亚分析

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kinuko Nagayoshi, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Masafumi Nakamura, Koji Okabayashi, Motoi Uchino, Hiroki Ikeuchi, Tatsuki Noguchi, Soichiro Ishihara, Yoichi Ajioka, Kenichi Sugihara, from the Study Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated Intestinal Cancers by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum
{"title":"手术治疗对老年溃疡性结肠炎相关结直肠癌患者的预后价值:一项日本全国性多中心研究的亚分析","authors":"Kinuko Nagayoshi,&nbsp;Yusuke Mizuuchi,&nbsp;Masafumi Nakamura,&nbsp;Koji Okabayashi,&nbsp;Motoi Uchino,&nbsp;Hiroki Ikeuchi,&nbsp;Tatsuki Noguchi,&nbsp;Soichiro Ishihara,&nbsp;Yoichi Ajioka,&nbsp;Kenichi Sugihara,&nbsp;from the Study Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated Intestinal Cancers by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Our study aimed to examine the characteristics of elderly patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer (UAC) and evaluate the impact of surgical intervention on prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1086 patients diagnosed with UAC between 1980 and 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Data were collected through the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum project. The patients were divided into two groups: 248 elderly patients in the E-UAC group and 838 nonelderly patients in the NE-UAC group. Patients aged &gt;65 y at cancer diagnosis were considered elderly.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups. Segmental resection was the only common independent risk factor for recurrence in both the E-UAC and the NE-UAC groups. The E-UAC patients had significantly better 5-y disease-specific survival (DSS) than the NE-UAC patients (94.7% vs 91.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). There were no differences in 5-y recurrence-free survival (RFS; 89.3% vs 86.6%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.24) or overall survival (OS; 88.8% vs 89.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.50). The E-UAC patients who underwent segmental resection had poorer RFS than those who underwent total proctocolectomy, but there were no significant differences in DSS or OS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the elevated risk of cancer recurrence observed in the UAC patients who underwent segmental resection in both the E-UAC the NE-UAC groups, our findings suggested that segmental resection may be a viable alternative to total proctocolectomy in terms of survival rate for the E-UAC patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"486-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12885","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of surgical treatment in elderly patients with ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer: A subanalysis of a nationwide Japanese multicenter study\",\"authors\":\"Kinuko Nagayoshi,&nbsp;Yusuke Mizuuchi,&nbsp;Masafumi Nakamura,&nbsp;Koji Okabayashi,&nbsp;Motoi Uchino,&nbsp;Hiroki Ikeuchi,&nbsp;Tatsuki Noguchi,&nbsp;Soichiro Ishihara,&nbsp;Yoichi Ajioka,&nbsp;Kenichi Sugihara,&nbsp;from the Study Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated Intestinal Cancers by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ags3.12885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study aimed to examine the characteristics of elderly patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer (UAC) and evaluate the impact of surgical intervention on prognosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 1086 patients diagnosed with UAC between 1980 and 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Data were collected through the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum project. The patients were divided into two groups: 248 elderly patients in the E-UAC group and 838 nonelderly patients in the NE-UAC group. Patients aged &gt;65 y at cancer diagnosis were considered elderly.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups. Segmental resection was the only common independent risk factor for recurrence in both the E-UAC and the NE-UAC groups. The E-UAC patients had significantly better 5-y disease-specific survival (DSS) than the NE-UAC patients (94.7% vs 91.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). There were no differences in 5-y recurrence-free survival (RFS; 89.3% vs 86.6%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.24) or overall survival (OS; 88.8% vs 89.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.50). The E-UAC patients who underwent segmental resection had poorer RFS than those who underwent total proctocolectomy, but there were no significant differences in DSS or OS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite the elevated risk of cancer recurrence observed in the UAC patients who underwent segmental resection in both the E-UAC the NE-UAC groups, our findings suggested that segmental resection may be a viable alternative to total proctocolectomy in terms of survival rate for the E-UAC patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"486-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12885\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12885\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨老年溃疡性结肠炎相关结直肠癌(UAC)患者的特点,评价手术干预对预后的影响。方法回顾性分析1980 ~ 2020年间诊断为UAC的1086例患者。数据是通过日本结肠和直肠癌症协会项目收集的。患者分为两组:老年患者248例为E-UAC组,非老年患者838例为NE-UAC组。确诊时年龄为65岁的患者被认为是老年人。结果两组复发率无明显差异。节段性切除是E-UAC组和NE-UAC组中唯一常见的独立复发危险因素。E-UAC患者的5年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)显著高于NE-UAC患者(94.7% vs 91.0%, p = 0.04)。5年无复发生存期(RFS;89.3% vs 86.6%, p = 0.24)或总生存期(OS;88.8% vs 89.6%, p = 0.50)。经节段切除的E-UAC患者的RFS较全直结肠切除术患者差,但DSS和OS无显著差异。结论尽管在E-UAC组和NE-UAC组中,UAC患者行节段性切除术的癌症复发风险较高,但我们的研究结果表明,就E-UAC患者的生存率而言,节段性切除术可能是一种可行的替代全直结肠切除术的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic value of surgical treatment in elderly patients with ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer: A subanalysis of a nationwide Japanese multicenter study

Aim

Our study aimed to examine the characteristics of elderly patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer (UAC) and evaluate the impact of surgical intervention on prognosis.

Methods

A total of 1086 patients diagnosed with UAC between 1980 and 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Data were collected through the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum project. The patients were divided into two groups: 248 elderly patients in the E-UAC group and 838 nonelderly patients in the NE-UAC group. Patients aged >65 y at cancer diagnosis were considered elderly.

Results

The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups. Segmental resection was the only common independent risk factor for recurrence in both the E-UAC and the NE-UAC groups. The E-UAC patients had significantly better 5-y disease-specific survival (DSS) than the NE-UAC patients (94.7% vs 91.0%, p = 0.04). There were no differences in 5-y recurrence-free survival (RFS; 89.3% vs 86.6%, respectively, p = 0.24) or overall survival (OS; 88.8% vs 89.6%, p = 0.50). The E-UAC patients who underwent segmental resection had poorer RFS than those who underwent total proctocolectomy, but there were no significant differences in DSS or OS.

Conclusion

Despite the elevated risk of cancer recurrence observed in the UAC patients who underwent segmental resection in both the E-UAC the NE-UAC groups, our findings suggested that segmental resection may be a viable alternative to total proctocolectomy in terms of survival rate for the E-UAC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信