通过多方利益相关者的共识发展社区心理健康研究的优先结果领域:日本的在线德尔菲研究

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Takuma Shiozawa, Sosei Yamaguchi, Momoka Igarashi, Makoto Ogawa, Makiko Abe, Naonori Yasuma, Takayuki Kawaguchi, Chiyo Fujii
{"title":"通过多方利益相关者的共识发展社区心理健康研究的优先结果领域:日本的在线德尔菲研究","authors":"Takuma Shiozawa,&nbsp;Sosei Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Momoka Igarashi,&nbsp;Makoto Ogawa,&nbsp;Makiko Abe,&nbsp;Naonori Yasuma,&nbsp;Takayuki Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Chiyo Fujii","doi":"10.1111/inm.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several core outcome sets (COS) have been developed in the field of mental health; however, the specific outcome domains that should be prioritised in community mental health research remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the key outcome domains for community mental health research in Japan, as determined by multiple stakeholders. First, a comprehensive list of outcome domains was compiled by scoping reviews, focus group interviews, and web-based questionnaire surveys. This was followed by two rounds of preliminary surveys with multiple stakeholders. Finally, three rounds of a web-based Delphi survey were conducted to determine the most important outcome domains of community mental health research in Japan. A total of 96 outcome domains were evaluated by 297 participants, with a response rate of 93.6%. This study identified 24 outcome domains that are essential for community mental health research in Japan. These 24 domains, which reached a consensus, included aspects related to comprehensive symptom assessment and personal recovery. Given that community care serves patients with diverse illnesses, identifying outcome domains that are broadly applicable across different community care settings rather than being limited to specific conditions is critical for future research. The study also highlights differences in perspectives among stakeholders regarding the importance of various outcomes. Despite these differences, several outcome domains have been recognised as being significantly important in the overall consensus.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000044680.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Priority Outcome Domains for Community Mental Health Research via Consensus Among Multiple Stakeholders: Online Delphi Study in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Takuma Shiozawa,&nbsp;Sosei Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Momoka Igarashi,&nbsp;Makoto Ogawa,&nbsp;Makiko Abe,&nbsp;Naonori Yasuma,&nbsp;Takayuki Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Chiyo Fujii\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Several core outcome sets (COS) have been developed in the field of mental health; however, the specific outcome domains that should be prioritised in community mental health research remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the key outcome domains for community mental health research in Japan, as determined by multiple stakeholders. First, a comprehensive list of outcome domains was compiled by scoping reviews, focus group interviews, and web-based questionnaire surveys. This was followed by two rounds of preliminary surveys with multiple stakeholders. Finally, three rounds of a web-based Delphi survey were conducted to determine the most important outcome domains of community mental health research in Japan. A total of 96 outcome domains were evaluated by 297 participants, with a response rate of 93.6%. This study identified 24 outcome domains that are essential for community mental health research in Japan. These 24 domains, which reached a consensus, included aspects related to comprehensive symptom assessment and personal recovery. Given that community care serves patients with diverse illnesses, identifying outcome domains that are broadly applicable across different community care settings rather than being limited to specific conditions is critical for future research. The study also highlights differences in perspectives among stakeholders regarding the importance of various outcomes. Despite these differences, several outcome domains have been recognised as being significantly important in the overall consensus.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000044680.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70049\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70049\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在精神卫生领域已经开发了几个核心结果集(COS);然而,在社区心理健康研究中应该优先考虑的具体结果领域仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定由多个利益相关者确定的日本社区心理健康研究的关键成果领域。首先,通过范围审查、焦点小组访谈和基于网络的问卷调查,编制了一份全面的结果领域清单。随后,对多个利益相关者进行了两轮初步调查。最后,进行了三轮基于网络的德尔菲调查,以确定日本社区心理健康研究最重要的结果领域。共有297名参与者评估了96个结果域,反应率为93.6%。本研究确定了24个结果域,这些结果域对日本社区心理健康研究至关重要。这24个领域达成了共识,包括综合症状评估和个人康复的相关方面。鉴于社区护理服务于不同疾病的患者,确定广泛适用于不同社区护理环境的结果域,而不是局限于特定条件,对未来的研究至关重要。该研究还强调了利益相关者对各种结果重要性的不同看法。尽管存在这些差异,但有几个结果领域在总体共识中被认为是非常重要的。试验注册:大学医院医学信息网(UMIN)临床试验注册:UMIN000044680。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of Priority Outcome Domains for Community Mental Health Research via Consensus Among Multiple Stakeholders: Online Delphi Study in Japan

Development of Priority Outcome Domains for Community Mental Health Research via Consensus Among Multiple Stakeholders: Online Delphi Study in Japan

Several core outcome sets (COS) have been developed in the field of mental health; however, the specific outcome domains that should be prioritised in community mental health research remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the key outcome domains for community mental health research in Japan, as determined by multiple stakeholders. First, a comprehensive list of outcome domains was compiled by scoping reviews, focus group interviews, and web-based questionnaire surveys. This was followed by two rounds of preliminary surveys with multiple stakeholders. Finally, three rounds of a web-based Delphi survey were conducted to determine the most important outcome domains of community mental health research in Japan. A total of 96 outcome domains were evaluated by 297 participants, with a response rate of 93.6%. This study identified 24 outcome domains that are essential for community mental health research in Japan. These 24 domains, which reached a consensus, included aspects related to comprehensive symptom assessment and personal recovery. Given that community care serves patients with diverse illnesses, identifying outcome domains that are broadly applicable across different community care settings rather than being limited to specific conditions is critical for future research. The study also highlights differences in perspectives among stakeholders regarding the importance of various outcomes. Despite these differences, several outcome domains have been recognised as being significantly important in the overall consensus.

Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000044680.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信