食品干燥建模的最新进展:从经验到多尺度物理信息神经网络

IF 12 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Aluth Durage Hiruni Tharaka Wijerathne, Mohammad U. H. Joardder, Zachary G. Welsh, Richi Nayak, Shyam S. Sablani, Azharul Karim
{"title":"食品干燥建模的最新进展:从经验到多尺度物理信息神经网络","authors":"Aluth Durage Hiruni Tharaka Wijerathne,&nbsp;Mohammad U. H. Joardder,&nbsp;Zachary G. Welsh,&nbsp;Richi Nayak,&nbsp;Shyam S. Sablani,&nbsp;Azharul Karim","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Food insecurity is a major global challenge. Food preservation, particularly through drying, presents a promising solution to enhance food security and minimize waste. Fruits and vegetables contain 80%–90% water, and much of this is removed during drying. However, structural changes across multiple length scales occur during drying, compromising stability and affecting quality. Understanding these changes is essential, and several modeling techniques exist to analyze them, including empirical modeling, physics-based computational methods, purely data-driven machine learning approaches, and physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. Although empirical methods are straightforward to implement, their limited generalizability and lack of physical insights have led to the development of physics-based computational methods. These methods can achieve high spatiotemporal resolution without requiring experimental investigations. However, their complexity and high computational costs have prompted the exploration of data-driven machine learning models for drying processes, which involve comparatively lower computational costs and are more straightforward to execute. Nonetheless, their poor predictive ability with sparse data has restricted their application, leading to a hybrid modeling approach: PINN, which merges physical insights with data-driven machine learning techniques. This method still holds significant potential for advancements in food drying modeling. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a comprehensive literature review of state-of-the-art conventional drying modeling techniques, such as empirical, physics-based computational, and pure data-driven machine learning techniques, and explores the potential of the PINN approach for overcoming the limitations associated with conventional drying modeling strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Advances in Food Drying Modeling: Empirical to Multiscale Physics-Informed Neural Networks\",\"authors\":\"Aluth Durage Hiruni Tharaka Wijerathne,&nbsp;Mohammad U. H. Joardder,&nbsp;Zachary G. Welsh,&nbsp;Richi Nayak,&nbsp;Shyam S. Sablani,&nbsp;Azharul Karim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1541-4337.70194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Food insecurity is a major global challenge. Food preservation, particularly through drying, presents a promising solution to enhance food security and minimize waste. Fruits and vegetables contain 80%–90% water, and much of this is removed during drying. However, structural changes across multiple length scales occur during drying, compromising stability and affecting quality. Understanding these changes is essential, and several modeling techniques exist to analyze them, including empirical modeling, physics-based computational methods, purely data-driven machine learning approaches, and physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. Although empirical methods are straightforward to implement, their limited generalizability and lack of physical insights have led to the development of physics-based computational methods. These methods can achieve high spatiotemporal resolution without requiring experimental investigations. However, their complexity and high computational costs have prompted the exploration of data-driven machine learning models for drying processes, which involve comparatively lower computational costs and are more straightforward to execute. Nonetheless, their poor predictive ability with sparse data has restricted their application, leading to a hybrid modeling approach: PINN, which merges physical insights with data-driven machine learning techniques. This method still holds significant potential for advancements in food drying modeling. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a comprehensive literature review of state-of-the-art conventional drying modeling techniques, such as empirical, physics-based computational, and pure data-driven machine learning techniques, and explores the potential of the PINN approach for overcoming the limitations associated with conventional drying modeling strategies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70194\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70194","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粮食不安全是一项重大的全球性挑战。食品保存,特别是通过干燥保存,是加强粮食安全和减少浪费的一种很有前途的解决方案。水果和蔬菜含有80%-90%的水分,其中大部分在干燥过程中被去除。然而,在干燥过程中,会发生多个长度尺度的结构变化,从而损害稳定性并影响质量。了解这些变化是至关重要的,有几种建模技术可以分析这些变化,包括经验建模、基于物理的计算方法、纯数据驱动的机器学习方法和物理信息神经网络(PINN)模型。虽然经验方法很容易实现,但它们有限的通用性和缺乏物理洞察力导致了基于物理的计算方法的发展。这些方法可以在不需要实验研究的情况下实现高时空分辨率。然而,它们的复杂性和高计算成本促使人们探索数据驱动的干燥过程机器学习模型,这些模型涉及相对较低的计算成本,并且更容易执行。尽管如此,它们对稀疏数据的糟糕预测能力限制了它们的应用,导致了一种混合建模方法:PINN,它将物理洞察力与数据驱动的机器学习技术相结合。这种方法在食品干燥建模方面仍有很大的发展潜力。因此,本研究旨在对最先进的传统干燥建模技术(如经验、基于物理的计算和纯数据驱动的机器学习技术)进行全面的文献综述,并探索PINN方法在克服传统干燥建模策略相关局限性方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent Advances in Food Drying Modeling: Empirical to Multiscale Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Food insecurity is a major global challenge. Food preservation, particularly through drying, presents a promising solution to enhance food security and minimize waste. Fruits and vegetables contain 80%–90% water, and much of this is removed during drying. However, structural changes across multiple length scales occur during drying, compromising stability and affecting quality. Understanding these changes is essential, and several modeling techniques exist to analyze them, including empirical modeling, physics-based computational methods, purely data-driven machine learning approaches, and physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. Although empirical methods are straightforward to implement, their limited generalizability and lack of physical insights have led to the development of physics-based computational methods. These methods can achieve high spatiotemporal resolution without requiring experimental investigations. However, their complexity and high computational costs have prompted the exploration of data-driven machine learning models for drying processes, which involve comparatively lower computational costs and are more straightforward to execute. Nonetheless, their poor predictive ability with sparse data has restricted their application, leading to a hybrid modeling approach: PINN, which merges physical insights with data-driven machine learning techniques. This method still holds significant potential for advancements in food drying modeling. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a comprehensive literature review of state-of-the-art conventional drying modeling techniques, such as empirical, physics-based computational, and pure data-driven machine learning techniques, and explores the potential of the PINN approach for overcoming the limitations associated with conventional drying modeling strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信