Raunkiæran缺陷:性状生态学的挑战与展望

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Francesco de Bello, Felícia M. Fischer, Javier Puy, Bill Shipley, Miguel Verdú, Lars Götzenberger, Sandra Lavorel, Marco Moretti, Ian J. Wright, Matty P. Berg, Carlos Pérez Carmona, J. Hans C. Cornelissen, André T. C. Dias, Heloise Gibb, Jan Lepš, Joshua S. Madin, Maria Majeková, Juli G. Pausas, Jules Segrestin, Mar Sobral, Amy E. Zanne, Eric Garnier
{"title":"Raunkiæran缺陷:性状生态学的挑战与展望","authors":"Francesco de Bello,&nbsp;Felícia M. Fischer,&nbsp;Javier Puy,&nbsp;Bill Shipley,&nbsp;Miguel Verdú,&nbsp;Lars Götzenberger,&nbsp;Sandra Lavorel,&nbsp;Marco Moretti,&nbsp;Ian J. Wright,&nbsp;Matty P. Berg,&nbsp;Carlos Pérez Carmona,&nbsp;J. Hans C. Cornelissen,&nbsp;André T. C. Dias,&nbsp;Heloise Gibb,&nbsp;Jan Lepš,&nbsp;Joshua S. Madin,&nbsp;Maria Majeková,&nbsp;Juli G. Pausas,&nbsp;Jules Segrestin,&nbsp;Mar Sobral,&nbsp;Amy E. Zanne,&nbsp;Eric Garnier","doi":"10.1002/ecm.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Trait-based ecology, a prominent research field identifying traits linked to the distribution and interactions of organisms and their impact on ecosystem functioning, has flourished in the last three decades. Yet, the field still grapples with critical challenges, broadly framed as Raunkiæran shortfalls. Recognizing and interconnecting these limitations is vital for designing and prioritizing research objectives and mainstreaming trait-based approaches across a variety of organisms, trophic levels, and biomes. This strategic review scrutinizes eight major limitations within trait-based ecology, spanning scales from organisms to the entire biosphere. Challenges range from defining and measuring traits (SF 1), exploring intraspecific variability within and across individuals and populations (SF 2), understanding the complex relationships between trait variation and fitness (SF 3), and discerning trait variations with underlying evolutionary patterns (SF 4). This review extends to community assembly (SF 5), ecosystem functioning and multitrophic relationships (SFs 6 and 7), and global repositories and scaling (SF 8). At the core of trait-based ecology lies the ambition of scaling up processes from individuals to ecosystems by exploring the ecological strategies of organisms and connecting them to ecosystem functions across multiple trophic levels. Achieving this goal necessitates addressing key limitations embedded in the foundations of trait-based ecology. After identifying key SFs, we propose pathways for advancing trait-based ecology, fortifying its robustness, and unlocking its full potential to significantly contribute to ecological understanding and biodiversity conservation. This review underscores the significance of systematically evaluating the performance of organisms in standardized conditions, encompassing their responses to environmental variation and effects on ecosystems. This approach aims to bridge the gap between easily measurable traits, species ecological strategies, their demography, and their combined impacts on ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"95 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raunkiæran shortfalls: Challenges and perspectives in trait-based ecology\",\"authors\":\"Francesco de Bello,&nbsp;Felícia M. Fischer,&nbsp;Javier Puy,&nbsp;Bill Shipley,&nbsp;Miguel Verdú,&nbsp;Lars Götzenberger,&nbsp;Sandra Lavorel,&nbsp;Marco Moretti,&nbsp;Ian J. Wright,&nbsp;Matty P. Berg,&nbsp;Carlos Pérez Carmona,&nbsp;J. Hans C. Cornelissen,&nbsp;André T. C. Dias,&nbsp;Heloise Gibb,&nbsp;Jan Lepš,&nbsp;Joshua S. Madin,&nbsp;Maria Majeková,&nbsp;Juli G. Pausas,&nbsp;Jules Segrestin,&nbsp;Mar Sobral,&nbsp;Amy E. Zanne,&nbsp;Eric Garnier\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecm.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Trait-based ecology, a prominent research field identifying traits linked to the distribution and interactions of organisms and their impact on ecosystem functioning, has flourished in the last three decades. Yet, the field still grapples with critical challenges, broadly framed as Raunkiæran shortfalls. Recognizing and interconnecting these limitations is vital for designing and prioritizing research objectives and mainstreaming trait-based approaches across a variety of organisms, trophic levels, and biomes. This strategic review scrutinizes eight major limitations within trait-based ecology, spanning scales from organisms to the entire biosphere. Challenges range from defining and measuring traits (SF 1), exploring intraspecific variability within and across individuals and populations (SF 2), understanding the complex relationships between trait variation and fitness (SF 3), and discerning trait variations with underlying evolutionary patterns (SF 4). This review extends to community assembly (SF 5), ecosystem functioning and multitrophic relationships (SFs 6 and 7), and global repositories and scaling (SF 8). At the core of trait-based ecology lies the ambition of scaling up processes from individuals to ecosystems by exploring the ecological strategies of organisms and connecting them to ecosystem functions across multiple trophic levels. Achieving this goal necessitates addressing key limitations embedded in the foundations of trait-based ecology. After identifying key SFs, we propose pathways for advancing trait-based ecology, fortifying its robustness, and unlocking its full potential to significantly contribute to ecological understanding and biodiversity conservation. This review underscores the significance of systematically evaluating the performance of organisms in standardized conditions, encompassing their responses to environmental variation and effects on ecosystems. This approach aims to bridge the gap between easily measurable traits, species ecological strategies, their demography, and their combined impacts on ecosystems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"volume\":\"95 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.70018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性状生态学是一个突出的研究领域,研究与生物的分布和相互作用及其对生态系统功能的影响有关的性状,在过去三十年中蓬勃发展。然而,该领域仍然面临着严峻的挑战,这些挑战被广泛地描述为Raunkiæran的不足。认识和联系这些限制对于设计和确定研究目标的优先级以及将基于性状的方法纳入各种生物、营养水平和生物群系的主流至关重要。这一战略审查审查了八个主要的限制在性状为基础的生态学,跨越从生物体到整个生物圈的尺度。挑战包括定义和测量性状(SF 1),探索个体和群体内部和之间的种内变异性(SF 2),理解性状变异和适合度之间的复杂关系(SF 3),以及识别具有潜在进化模式的性状变异(SF 4)。这篇综述扩展到群落聚集(sff5),生态系统功能和多营养关系(sff6和7),以及全球资源库和规模(sff8)。性状生态学的核心是通过探索生物的生态策略并将它们与多个营养水平的生态系统功能联系起来,将过程从个体扩展到生态系统。要实现这一目标,就必须解决基于性状的生态学基础中的关键限制。在确定了关键的特征因子后,我们提出了推进基于性状的生态学、增强其稳健性和释放其全部潜力的途径,以显著促进生态认识和生物多样性保护。这篇综述强调了系统评估生物在标准化条件下的表现的重要性,包括它们对环境变化的反应和对生态系统的影响。这种方法旨在弥合容易测量的特征、物种生态策略、它们的人口统计以及它们对生态系统的综合影响之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Raunkiæran shortfalls: Challenges and perspectives in trait-based ecology

Trait-based ecology, a prominent research field identifying traits linked to the distribution and interactions of organisms and their impact on ecosystem functioning, has flourished in the last three decades. Yet, the field still grapples with critical challenges, broadly framed as Raunkiæran shortfalls. Recognizing and interconnecting these limitations is vital for designing and prioritizing research objectives and mainstreaming trait-based approaches across a variety of organisms, trophic levels, and biomes. This strategic review scrutinizes eight major limitations within trait-based ecology, spanning scales from organisms to the entire biosphere. Challenges range from defining and measuring traits (SF 1), exploring intraspecific variability within and across individuals and populations (SF 2), understanding the complex relationships between trait variation and fitness (SF 3), and discerning trait variations with underlying evolutionary patterns (SF 4). This review extends to community assembly (SF 5), ecosystem functioning and multitrophic relationships (SFs 6 and 7), and global repositories and scaling (SF 8). At the core of trait-based ecology lies the ambition of scaling up processes from individuals to ecosystems by exploring the ecological strategies of organisms and connecting them to ecosystem functions across multiple trophic levels. Achieving this goal necessitates addressing key limitations embedded in the foundations of trait-based ecology. After identifying key SFs, we propose pathways for advancing trait-based ecology, fortifying its robustness, and unlocking its full potential to significantly contribute to ecological understanding and biodiversity conservation. This review underscores the significance of systematically evaluating the performance of organisms in standardized conditions, encompassing their responses to environmental variation and effects on ecosystems. This approach aims to bridge the gap between easily measurable traits, species ecological strategies, their demography, and their combined impacts on ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信