脑卒中后运动错误加工过程中的皮质-小脑动力学

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Nitesh Singh Malan, Raghavan Gopalakrishnan, David Cunningham, Olivia Hogue, Kenneth B. Baker, Andre G. Machado
{"title":"脑卒中后运动错误加工过程中的皮质-小脑动力学","authors":"Nitesh Singh Malan,&nbsp;Raghavan Gopalakrishnan,&nbsp;David Cunningham,&nbsp;Olivia Hogue,&nbsp;Kenneth B. Baker,&nbsp;Andre G. Machado","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cerebellum acts as a forward internal model to predict motor outcomes, compare them with sensory feedback, and generate prediction errors that refine prediction accuracy. Our physiological understanding of cerebellar function during motor control derives predominantly from animal experiments and clinical observations in patients with disorders of the cerebellum or its connections with the cerebrum and spinal cord. Here, we report a human electrophysiology-based investigation of cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway activity during motor error detection and correction. Participants performed a computerized motor oddball task while synchronized electrophysiological recordings were collected from cerebellar dentate (DN) using depth electrodes and scalp electroencephalography (EEG). The task involved moving a 2-D ball on a screen toward a predetermined target at 40% (standard trials) or 20% (oddball trials) of their maximum voluntary contraction. Six participants completed an average of 239 trials, with oddball trials randomly occurring with a 30% frequency. At the cortex, oddball trials exhibited significantly greater centro-parietal error positivity and fronto-centro-parietal desynchronization during error correction, predominantly in the alpha and low beta frequency bands. DN examination also revealed greater alpha and low beta desynchronization during error correction. Lastly, oddball trials showed significantly greater cortico-cerebellar coherence during error correction in the same frequency bands with bidirectional interaction between the cortex and DN. These findings expand on the cortico-cerebello-cortical physiology of human motor control and provide cues for designing interventions aimed at alleviating the functional burdens of acquired injuries of the central nervous system.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70227","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Cortico-Cerebellar Dynamics During Motor Error Processing After Stroke\",\"authors\":\"Nitesh Singh Malan,&nbsp;Raghavan Gopalakrishnan,&nbsp;David Cunningham,&nbsp;Olivia Hogue,&nbsp;Kenneth B. Baker,&nbsp;Andre G. Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The cerebellum acts as a forward internal model to predict motor outcomes, compare them with sensory feedback, and generate prediction errors that refine prediction accuracy. Our physiological understanding of cerebellar function during motor control derives predominantly from animal experiments and clinical observations in patients with disorders of the cerebellum or its connections with the cerebrum and spinal cord. Here, we report a human electrophysiology-based investigation of cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway activity during motor error detection and correction. Participants performed a computerized motor oddball task while synchronized electrophysiological recordings were collected from cerebellar dentate (DN) using depth electrodes and scalp electroencephalography (EEG). The task involved moving a 2-D ball on a screen toward a predetermined target at 40% (standard trials) or 20% (oddball trials) of their maximum voluntary contraction. Six participants completed an average of 239 trials, with oddball trials randomly occurring with a 30% frequency. At the cortex, oddball trials exhibited significantly greater centro-parietal error positivity and fronto-centro-parietal desynchronization during error correction, predominantly in the alpha and low beta frequency bands. DN examination also revealed greater alpha and low beta desynchronization during error correction. Lastly, oddball trials showed significantly greater cortico-cerebellar coherence during error correction in the same frequency bands with bidirectional interaction between the cortex and DN. These findings expand on the cortico-cerebello-cortical physiology of human motor control and provide cues for designing interventions aimed at alleviating the functional burdens of acquired injuries of the central nervous system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70227\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70227\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小脑作为一个向前的内部模型来预测运动结果,将它们与感觉反馈进行比较,并产生预测误差,从而提高预测精度。我们对运动控制过程中小脑功能的生理学理解主要来自动物实验和小脑或小脑与大脑和脊髓连接障碍患者的临床观察。在这里,我们报告了一项基于人体电生理学的研究,研究了运动错误检测和纠正过程中小脑-丘脑-皮层通路的活动。研究人员利用深度电极和头皮脑电图(EEG)从齿状小脑(DN)收集同步电生理记录,同时对参与者进行计算机化的运动怪球任务。这项任务包括将屏幕上的一个二维球移动到预定的目标上,速度为其最大自愿收缩的40%(标准试验)或20%(古怪试验)。六名参与者平均完成了239次试验,其中奇怪的试验随机出现的频率为30%。在皮层,古怪实验在误差校正过程中表现出更大的中央-顶叶误差正性和额-中央-顶叶不同步,主要在α和低β频段。DN检查也显示在纠错期间更大的α和低β不同步。最后,古怪实验显示,在相同频带的错误纠正过程中,皮质-小脑的一致性显著增强,皮质和DN之间存在双向相互作用。这些发现扩展了人类运动控制的皮质-小脑-皮质生理学,并为设计旨在减轻中枢神经系统获得性损伤的功能负担的干预措施提供了线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Cortico-Cerebellar Dynamics During Motor Error Processing After Stroke

The cerebellum acts as a forward internal model to predict motor outcomes, compare them with sensory feedback, and generate prediction errors that refine prediction accuracy. Our physiological understanding of cerebellar function during motor control derives predominantly from animal experiments and clinical observations in patients with disorders of the cerebellum or its connections with the cerebrum and spinal cord. Here, we report a human electrophysiology-based investigation of cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway activity during motor error detection and correction. Participants performed a computerized motor oddball task while synchronized electrophysiological recordings were collected from cerebellar dentate (DN) using depth electrodes and scalp electroencephalography (EEG). The task involved moving a 2-D ball on a screen toward a predetermined target at 40% (standard trials) or 20% (oddball trials) of their maximum voluntary contraction. Six participants completed an average of 239 trials, with oddball trials randomly occurring with a 30% frequency. At the cortex, oddball trials exhibited significantly greater centro-parietal error positivity and fronto-centro-parietal desynchronization during error correction, predominantly in the alpha and low beta frequency bands. DN examination also revealed greater alpha and low beta desynchronization during error correction. Lastly, oddball trials showed significantly greater cortico-cerebellar coherence during error correction in the same frequency bands with bidirectional interaction between the cortex and DN. These findings expand on the cortico-cerebello-cortical physiology of human motor control and provide cues for designing interventions aimed at alleviating the functional burdens of acquired injuries of the central nervous system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信