{"title":"海洋中的颗粒无机碳:离散采样方案的评价","authors":"Catherine Mitchell, Jelena Godrijan","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluates the impact of sampling protocols on the measurement of particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) in ocean waters, an essential component for understanding the global carbon cycle and climate regulation. The study compares four protocols for estimating PIC in discrete water column samples, focusing on the effects of filter pore size (0.4 vs. 0.8 <i>μ</i>m) and rinsing agents (pH-adjusted MilliQ water with NH<sub>4</sub>OH vs. potassium tetraborate buffer). Five coccolithophore strains were selected to represent variations in PIC content resulting from species-specific differences in coccolith mass, coccolith number per cell, and life cycle phase. Discrete samples were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Statistical analyses show no significant differences in PIC concentrations between protocols, filter types, or rinsing agents, confirming the robustness and precision of the measurement method. In addition, the non-calcifying strain provided insights into the measurement uncertainty and enabled us to quantify the precision of the sampling method. These results suggest that researchers can use any tested protocol without compromising data quality. This will improve the reliability and comparability of PIC measurements and contribute to a more precise understanding of ocean carbon dynamics and climate regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":"23 5","pages":"326-335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10683","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Particulate inorganic carbon in the ocean: Evaluation of discrete sampling protocols\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Mitchell, Jelena Godrijan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lom3.10683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study evaluates the impact of sampling protocols on the measurement of particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) in ocean waters, an essential component for understanding the global carbon cycle and climate regulation. The study compares four protocols for estimating PIC in discrete water column samples, focusing on the effects of filter pore size (0.4 vs. 0.8 <i>μ</i>m) and rinsing agents (pH-adjusted MilliQ water with NH<sub>4</sub>OH vs. potassium tetraborate buffer). Five coccolithophore strains were selected to represent variations in PIC content resulting from species-specific differences in coccolith mass, coccolith number per cell, and life cycle phase. Discrete samples were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Statistical analyses show no significant differences in PIC concentrations between protocols, filter types, or rinsing agents, confirming the robustness and precision of the measurement method. In addition, the non-calcifying strain provided insights into the measurement uncertainty and enabled us to quantify the precision of the sampling method. These results suggest that researchers can use any tested protocol without compromising data quality. This will improve the reliability and comparability of PIC measurements and contribute to a more precise understanding of ocean carbon dynamics and climate regulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"326-335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10683\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10683\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Particulate inorganic carbon in the ocean: Evaluation of discrete sampling protocols
This study evaluates the impact of sampling protocols on the measurement of particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) in ocean waters, an essential component for understanding the global carbon cycle and climate regulation. The study compares four protocols for estimating PIC in discrete water column samples, focusing on the effects of filter pore size (0.4 vs. 0.8 μm) and rinsing agents (pH-adjusted MilliQ water with NH4OH vs. potassium tetraborate buffer). Five coccolithophore strains were selected to represent variations in PIC content resulting from species-specific differences in coccolith mass, coccolith number per cell, and life cycle phase. Discrete samples were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Statistical analyses show no significant differences in PIC concentrations between protocols, filter types, or rinsing agents, confirming the robustness and precision of the measurement method. In addition, the non-calcifying strain provided insights into the measurement uncertainty and enabled us to quantify the precision of the sampling method. These results suggest that researchers can use any tested protocol without compromising data quality. This will improve the reliability and comparability of PIC measurements and contribute to a more precise understanding of ocean carbon dynamics and climate regulation.
期刊介绍:
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication.
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.